CO2 Laser vs UltraClear?

Question

I've previously had several successful CO2 laser procedures. It seems that procedure is being phased out for something called UltraClear (at least at my dermatologist's office). My question is threefold: can I get the same results with this new laser? And can the UltraClear laser perform this in one single procedure as the CO2 was able to do? And, finally, is the cost commensurate? Thank you very much!

Shanthala Shivananjappa, MD · Answer

Yes, in my opinion, UltraClear is superior to any traditional CO2 or Erbium:YAG laser. The reason is the unique Laser Coring technology, which has completely replaced traditional mechanical tissue removal methods used in older lasers.

Traditional CO2 lasers cause too much coagulation and collateral damage, leading to longer healing times, more discomfort, and a higher risk of complications. On the other hand, Erbium lasers (like Er:YAG) have no coagulation at all, which means higher risk of bleeding, slow healing, and less controlled tissue removal—especially when treating larger areas. UltraClear Laser Coring combines the best of both worlds, allowing for: Precise ablation without excessive heat. Controlled coagulation to minimize bleeding and speed up healing. More effective collagen remodeling with less downtime

Another huge advantage of UltraClear is its versatility. Unlike CO2 lasers, which are not safe for use on the neck and chest, UltraClear can effectively treat the face, neck, and chest safely. It delivers outstanding resurfacing results without the risks of scarring or prolonged redness, which is why it has completely changed how we approach laser resurfacing.

I’d highly encourage you to check out my RealSelf page, where more than 50 patients have shared their experiences with UltraClear, along with their own before-and-after photos. You’ll be able to see real results.

CO2 Laser vs UltraClear?

Answers (1)