Will 225 and 275cc subglandular, high profile implants give me a natural look? (Photos)

Your surgeon obviously had the advantage of examining you, but in general, I agree with your impression that a more natural outcome tends to be achieved when the implant is placed under the muscle, thus achieving a slight upper pole flattening and therefore mimicking the natural breast. It is impossible to know ahead of time if you need a 50 cc difference or less or more, but it is important to realize that fine tuning your asymmetry can only be achieved using a saline filled implant. That said, it is generally agreed upon that our eye can rarely distinguish differences of less than 20 cc's in breast size. And as you probably well know, chest wall asymmetry such as you appear to have, is extremely common.

If you have doubts or concerns after your initial consultation you might be advised to see a second opinion. It is important to also keep in mind that a subtle asymmetry is likely to persist even with the optimal breast augmentation. I recommend using photos of your "ideal" outcome to share with your plastic surgeon to make sure you are both looking at the same picture. Words such as "natural" can mean different things to different people. Best of luck to you.

Good morning,
I totally disagree with your PS- your implants should be placed under the muscle- they will look better, last longer, have a lower rate of capsular contracture, and mammograms will be better.