I had an anchor breast lift and a year later my doctor said I can use another one. How is this possible?

You were happy with your choice of surgeon when you paid for the performance of your surgery, and you now are upset they are not large enough or "up" enough. If you and your surgeon discussed 500cc implants, then putting in 400cc implants must have been critical to avoiding circulation problems with your breast lift skin flaps, or else he would have used the larger implants. (He didn't use the "wrong size" just to spite you--dead skin and exposed implant(s) is a surgical disaster requiring salvage reconstruction.)Plus, you wanted higher and tighter. That involves more skin removal to create even smaller-capacity breasts. Two opposing goals. And ones that are mutually incompatible.Your surgeon was wise and experienced to understand this, and you should be grateful for that judgement and training. It appears your surgeon's only error was in either failing to correct your unrealistic expectations, or accepting you as a patient. But he did, and now has to live with your inappropriate anger. Please understand that your anger and frustration are not going to resolve your dissatisfaction, and going to another plastic surgeon will cost you full price for any attempt at revisionary surgery, which may still be inadvisable. After 1 year, your tissues may have indeed softened and stretched to allow bigger implants, or more skin removal, but maybe not both (just as before). Please carefully consider the wisdom of any request to try to do that. Part of what you pay your surgeon for is judgement and expertise based on having done this a few (hundreds of) times. Why would you expect a refund for judicious exercise of surgical judgement, when you apparently either are incapable of understanding that you owe your surgeon thanks for not attempting to fulfill your (unrealistic) expectations and creating a truly uncorrectable surgical disaster, or are unwilling to accept that the problem lies with the goals you set.Truly, I am not trying to be harsh with you, but golly, you sure sound upset with your surgeon, who only exercised care in your surgery by avoiding unsafe practices. If you try to stuff a 10 gallon head into an 8 gallon hat, you tear the hat, and you don't get to "take it back."Please understand that your surgeon was concerned for your safety and well-being, made appropriate choices on your behalf with the full training and experience he has to bear on your individual situation, and you apparently did quite well, except for your not being big enough or "up" enough. Perhaps that's as good as it gets! Best wishes! Dr. Tholen

Hi,It can be very, very frustrating, but the breast skin on some patients will re-stretch over time.  The reason in the first place for a breast lift is elastic skin and loose breast ligaments (Cooper's ligaments).  I can't say for sure without pre and postop photos and an index card held in your breast crease and a physical exam, but you may be one of the unlucky ones who has redeveloped breast ptosis. I am sorry if this is reoccurring, but it can be somewhat "normal" for some patients.  "Dr. Joe"

I am sorry to hear about your dissatisfaction after breast lifting surgery. Although, without viewing pictures or in-person physical examination, online consultants will not be of much specific help to you some general thoughts may be helpful. Patients who are considering breast augmentation/lifting surgery should understand that this combination surgery is significantly more complex than either one of the procedures done separately. In other words, the combination breast augmentation / mastopexy surgery differs from breast augmentation surgery alone in that it carries increased risk compared to either breast augmentation or mastopexy surgery performed separately.
Furthermore, the potential need for revisionary surgery is increased with breast augmentation / mastopexy surgery done at the same time.  This revisionary rate may be as high (or higher) than 20%. Patients should be aware of this higher revisionary rate;  obviously, the need for additional surgery, time off work/life  considerations,  and additional expenses  our “factors” that should be considered before undergoing the initial operation.Personally, I find that the breast augmentation/lifting procedure to be one of the most challenging  of the breast operations I perform, even compared to somewhat complex revisionary breast surgery. On the one hand,  when performing breast augmentation/lifting surgery we are increasing the breast  size with breast implants;  on the other hand, we are reducing the breast “envelope” in order to achieve the breast lift. These two “forces” must be balanced as perfectly as possible in order to achieve the desired results. Removing too much skin/ breast tissue is problematic;  removing too little breast skin/tissue can also be problematic.  Remember also that patients presenting for breast lifting surgery and general have lost some skin elasticity/thickness making potential incision line healing problems and/or recurrent drooping/sagging important concerns to communicate.  
The analogy I use in my practice is that  of a thinned out balloon,  being expanded with additional air, while at the same time removing some of the balloons rubber surface.  I hope that this analogy helps patients understand some of the issues at hand when performing the combination breast augmentation/lifing operation.
To achieve  a surgical result where the breast implant and breast tissue “come together” and behave like a single breast is one of my goals but can be difficult to achieve.  Essentially, we are trying to create a breast implant/breast tissue interface that feels and behaves as naturally ( as a single unit)  as possible. Generally speaking, making sure that the breast implant has some sub muscular and some sub glandular component ( dual plane)  and tailoring the overlying skin/subcutaneous tissue/breast tissue as precisely as possible over the underlying breast implant is key.
Despite these efforts, breast implants are after all a foreign body that don't necessarily stay where we wish they would;  therefore, breast implant related problems such as positioning ( too high, too low, lateral displacement etc.) can occur  and may be a reason for returning to the operating room for revisionary breast surgery.
I use a “tailor tacking” technique that allows a determination of what breast implant should be used to SAFELY produce the results the patient is looking for. This technique involves use of a temporary sizer and temporary “closure” of the overlying breast skin over the sizer. 
The use of the tailor tacking technique is very helpful.  Breast lifting involves removal of skin ( and tightening of the breast skin envelope)  while breast augmentation involves expansion of the breast skin envelope. These 2 forces are counteracting each other.  
Again, despite these efforts, breast implant and/or tissue/skin complications may arise causing minor or significant complications.
 
Generally speaking, it is difficult to achieve the “perfect” result with breast augmentation/lifting surgery, despite best efforts.  Patients should be aware of the complexity of this combination procedure, achieve REALISTIC EXPECTATIONS prior to proceeding, and understand that additional surgery ( along with the additional recovery time, stress, expenses etc) may be necessary in the short or long-term. Patients should understand that the results of the procedure will not necessarily match aesthetically the results of patients who have undergone breast augmentation surgery only.

For example, some patients who wish to maintain long-term superior pole volume/"roundness" may find that this result is not achieved after the initial breast augmentation/lifting operation.  An additional operation, possibly involving capsulorrhaphy, may be necessary to achieve the patient's longer-term goals ( with superior pole volume/roundness).  It is helpful if patients understand that this breast implant capsule used to provide the support for the breast implant is not present during the initial breast augmentation/lifting operation.  The capsule (layer of scar tissue) forms around the breast implant and may be a good source of supportive tissue during revisionary breast surgery,  Including correction of breast implant displacement/malposition problems ( such as bottoming out, symmastia,  lateral displacement etc).
 
Potential risks associated with breast augmentation/lifting surgery include infection, bleeding, incision line healing problems, loss/change of nipple/areola complex sensation, and blood flow related issues  to causing skin or tissue necrosis.   Poor scarring,  pigment changes, areola/nipple asymmetry etc. are also potential problems. Again, patients may experience implant related problems such as encapsulation, leakage, displacement problems ( too high, bottoming out, lateral displacement, asymmetric positioning etc.), rippling/palpability of breast implants etc.  Patients may also be dissatisfied with breast size, shape, and/or how the  breast implants and overlying breast tissues “interface” with one another.    Occasionally, a breast implant may even have to be removed and the patient will generally be “implant free” for several months at least.  Obviously, this situation can be quite physically, emotionally, and psychosocially stressful to the patient involved.
Given the complexity  of the combination breast augmentation/lifting operation and the greater risk of revisionary breast surgery needed, there are good plastic surgeons who will insist on doing the procedures separately.
For me, if I see a patient who needs a great degree of lifting, who has lost a lot of skin elasticity, or  whose goal is a very large augmentation then I think it is best to do the procedures in 2 stages (in order to avoid serious complications). However, doing the procedure in one stage does increase the risks of complications in general and the potential need for further surgery. This increased risk must be weighed against the practical benefits of a single stage procedure (which most patients would prefer).

Conversely, if I see a patient who requires minimal to moderate lifting along with a small to moderate size augmentation (and has good skin quality), then doing the procedure one stage is much safer. Nevertheless, the potential risks  are greater with a 1 stage  procedure and the patient does have a higher  likelihood of needing revisionary surgery.
Having discussed some of the downsides  and potential risks/complications associated with breast augmentation/lifting surgery, most patients (If properly selected and who are doing the operations at the right time of their lives  psychosocially) accept the scars associated with breast augmentation/breast lifting surgery as long as they are happy with the improvement in contour, size, and symmetry.
 I hope that this summary of SOME  of the issues surrounding breast augmentation/lifting surgery  is helpful to you and other women considering this procedure in the future.
 The attached link may also be helpful.  Best wishes.