Breast Augmentation Redo to Bring Breasts Closer Together?

Thank you for your question.

Yes revision can be done to bring your breast implants closer together to improve your cleavage.

You will need a capsulorraphy or "Internal Ryan Procedure" to close down the lateral or side area of your breast implant pocket. Your implants are displaced to the side because the pocket is too large and too far off to the side.

The excess pocket can be closed with sutures. The medial pocket -near the breast bone can be enlarged to allow the new implant to move into the cleavage area.

Tightening the side of the pocket will force the implant to move toward the cleavage area. A larger implant will likely be necessary

 

Cleavage is one of the characteristics that’s associated
with physically attractive breasts.For
this reason, it’s not unusual for patients to desire this anatomic
feature.Unfortunately, this isn’t
always possible because of specific anatomic restraints that patients may have.Your
pictures suggest several areas of concern.These include a lateral sloping chest wall, lateral displacement of your
breast tissue and laterally positioned breast implants.Although,
you might benefit from medial re-positioning of your breast implants, this
might not entirely accomplish your aesthetic goals.It’s important to realize that breast
implants need to be centered beneath the nipple areola complex to avoid
secondary distortion. It’s also important to realize that underlying chest well
abnormalities can impose limitations on your final result as well.Under
these circumstances, re-positioning your breast implant would significantly
improve your aesthetic result. Unfortunately, the amount of cleavage would be
limited by the lateral position of the breasts and the shape of the underlying
chest wall.If
you’re considering revisional breast surgery it’s important to consult a board
certified plastic surgeon. This surgeon
should be able to formulate a treatment plan that addresses your anatomic
findings and achieves your aesthetic goals.

Much of the final “look” achieved after breast augmentation revision surgery  depends on several factors:
1. The initial shape, size (volume of breast tissue), symmetry of the patient's breasts. In general, the better the  preoperative breast appearance the more likely the breast augmentation “look” will be optimal.
2. The experience/skill level of the surgeon is important in determining the final outcome. For example, the accurate and gentle dissection of the breast implant pockets are critical in producing  long-term  well-placed breast implants. I personally think that these 2 factors are more important than any others, including type (saline or silicone)  or model (low/moderate/high profile)  of implant.
3. The type of implant used may  determine the final outcome, especially if the patient does not have significant covering breast or adipose tissue. For example, some surgeons feel that silicone implants have a more natural look and feel than saline implants because silicone gel has a texture that is similar to breast tissue. Each patient differs in the amount of breast tissue that they have.  If a patient has enough breast tissue to cover the implant, the final result will be similar when comparing saline implants versus silicone gel implants.  If a patient has very low body fat and/or very little breast tissue, the silicone gel implants may provide a more "natural" result.
On the other hand, saline implants have some advantages over silicone implants. Silicone implant ruptures are harder to detect. When saline implants rupture, they deflate and the results are seen almost immediately. When silicone implants rupture, the breast often looks and feels the same because the silicone gel may leak into surrounding areas of the breast without a visible difference.  Patients may need an MRI to diagnose a silicone gel rupture.   Saline implants are also less expensive than the silicone gel implants.
Other differences involve how the breast implants are filled. Saline implants are filled after they’re implanted, so saline implants require a smaller incision than prefilled silicone breast implants.
On May 10, 2000, the FDA granted approval of saline-filled breast implants manufactured by Mentor Corporation and McGhan Medical. To date, all other manufacturers’ saline-filled breast implants are considered investigational.
As of 2006, the FDA has approved the use of silicone gel implants manufactured by the Mentor Corporation and Allergan (formerly McGhan) for breast augmentation surgery for patients over the age of 22.
4. The size and model of breast implant used may  make a  significant difference in the final outcome. Therefore, it is very important to communicate your size goals with your surgeon.  In my practice, the use of photographs of “goal” pictures (and breasts that are too big or too small) is very helpful. I have found that the use of words such as “natural” or “C cup” or "fake looking" means different things to different people and therefore prove unhelpful.
Also, as you know, cup size varies depending on who makes the bra; therefore, discussing desired cup  size may also be inaccurate.
I use  intraoperative sizers and place the patient in the upright position to evaluate breast size. Use of these sizers also allow me to select the breast implant profile (low, moderate, moderate plus, high-profile) that would most likely achieve the patient's goals. The patient's goal pictures are hanging on the wall, and allow for direct comparison.
I have found that this system is very helpful in improving the chances of achieving the patient's goals as consistently as possible.
By the way, the most common regret after this operation, is “I wish I was bigger”.


I hope this helps.