PRFM vs PRP?

You need a formal evaluation to see what type of hair loss you may have. When you have hair loss, it's best to do a full hormonal workup for internal optimization, evaluate it with a dermatoscope, and consider scalp biopsies or scrapings to rule out any stress related, inflammatory, autoimmune or infectious causes of hair loss. In general, most people with early hair loss have telogen (stress related) and/or androgenetic (normal aging) and both can be treated with in office treatments like steroid injections, PRP/Acell, Exosomes and at home treatments like oral medications like Finasteride or Spironolactone, oral vitamins like Viviscal, topical exfoliating sprays like Restorsea, and weekly growth factors like anteagemd. See an expert for an evaluation. If hair loss is significant it may requires hair transplant (follicular unit translation).

There's not enough data to really support that one is better than the other, and will Yield better results. Just know that about a third of the patients may not get results, Another third gets some results and And another third gets excellent results. It depends on many factors outside of your control, like the patient's overall health and age.

I use PRFM (platelet-rich fibrin matrix) at my practice instead of PRP (platelet-rich plasma). We would take your blood and spin it down into PRFM which has more rejuvenative ability than PRP by itself. It stimulates more stem cells and stays in the area a lot longer. I have had great results with PRFM.