The concern is very real, even though blindness from filler is extremely rare. The glabella—the area between the eyebrows—is considered one of the higher-risk areas for filler because of its close connection to vessels that communicate with the ophthalmic artery, which supplies the eye. If filler is accidentally injected into one of these vessels, it can travel backward into the ophthalmic circulation and potentially block blood flow to the retina. The reason physicians take this risk so seriously is that, although uncommon, the outcome can be devastating and may be permanent. Recent reviews of reported cases continue to identify the glabella among the higher-risk injection sites, although the nose and forehead are also major areas of concern. How often does blindness happen? Unfortunately, there isn't a reliable percentage that can be given for an individual injection. The complication is sufficiently rare that we don't have a good denominator—there are many millions of filler injections performed, while the medical literature consists primarily of reported cases. So I would describe the risk as very low, but not zero, and importantly, it is not a complication that can be completely eliminated by choosing a particular filler or injection technique. The FDA specifically warns that inadvertent vascular injection of filler can cause tissue necrosis, stroke, or blindness. Is there a "safer" filler for the glabella? There isn't a filler that makes the glabella risk-free. Interestingly, reported cases of vision loss have involved several different filler materials, including hyaluronic acid, fat, collagen, poly-L-lactic acid, and calcium hydroxylapatite. Hyaluronic acid has actually accounted for a large proportion of reported cases, likely in part because it is so commonly used. One advantage of hyaluronic acid (HA) is that, unlike many other fillers, it can be treated with hyaluronidase if a vascular occlusion occurs. However, this should not be interpreted as meaning that HA filler is safe to inject into the glabella. Once an arterial occlusion affecting vision occurs, treatments have unfortunately not been shown to reliably restore vision. What about your particular divot? This is where I would be conservative. If Botox isn't correcting the depression, it suggests that there may be a structural component that Botox simply can't address. But that doesn't automatically mean that placing filler directly into the glabella is the best solution. Depending on exactly where the divot is and what is causing it, alternatives might include very conservative treatment of the surrounding anatomy rather than directly filling the highest-risk portion of the glabella. In some situations, treating adjacent areas can soften the appearance of a depression without placing filler directly into the central glabella. There are also patients for whom a small, carefully planned amount of filler may be considered by a highly experienced injector, but the decision has to be weighed against the fact that this is an elective cosmetic procedure with a very uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication. I would also be particularly cautious about anyone suggesting that a cannula, a particular filler, or a particular injection technique makes blindness impossible. These techniques may be intended to reduce risk, but none eliminates the vascular anatomy or makes the complication impossible. Even a relatively small amount of filler can potentially obstruct a vessel. If filler is ever placed in this region, it should be done by a physician who is very familiar with the vascular anatomy of the glabella and who has a clear emergency protocol for vascular occlusion. And if there is sudden vision change, unusual severe pain, skin blanching or discoloration, or neurologic symptoms during or shortly after filler injection, that is an emergency requiring immediate medical attention. Overall, for a cosmetic divot in this particular location, I would consider the risk-benefit calculation carefully. There are ways to improve the appearance of the area, but I would not consider any filler "safe" in the glabella simply because it is a certain brand or type of filler.