Is there a noticeable difference between implants places subfascial or submuscular?

Hello,
There is a noticeable difference to some with the different placement. You would be able to achieve more cleavage with going subfascial. If going subfascial, there are implants that we would use that have less wrinkling to them. You would be a candidate most likely for those reasons. The Mentor Boost implant have the least amount of wrinkling to them and would suggest that. If you enjoy lifting and working out you should think more about subfascial.
All the best,
Dr. Joe

Hi from Istanbul! For smaller implant sizes like a B or a small C cup, there's typically not much visible difference between subfascial and submuscular placements. However, with larger implants, the subfascial placement may result in more noticeable implant edges. It's important to have an in-person examination for a tailored recommendation. Hope this helps, best of luck!

The biggest benefit to having the implants subfascial is that they won't "animate" or move when you flex your chest muscles. Some women really don't like when that happens and so the subfascial placement can help with that. Submuscular placement usually looks a little more natural, but then the implants can move when you flex. Most women prefer them to look more natural, but it's a tradeoff. Even with little body fat, women can have subfascial placement. The implant style and size can be adjusted to help prevent palpability. Talk to your surgeon to make sure you understand the pros and cons of each approach before you make a decision. Best of luck!