FUE vs Bio FUE vs Direct FUE?
Doctor Answers 6
There's nothing particularly different about them. They are all FUE and all achieve the same results, Bio FUE and Direct FUE just sound fancier to appeal to potential patients more. There are no studies or articles published about these two methods to confirm that they do anything substantially different that makes them more successful.
FUE vs Bio FUE vs Direct FUE?
Thank you for your question. Thank you for your question. Loss of hair is a natural process when it is between the limits that the body can restore them. When the capacity of the body to restore the hair loss is beaten by the excessive hair loss then we can name this situation something that should be treated, To obtain alive hair follicles implanted in higher rates, the latest technique being used is not the only manner, it is also affected by compliance of implantation area that we found a better way to improve as a result of our researches, The Organic Hair Transplantation. By this new and unique Organic Hair Transplantation Technique, before the extraction and implantation processes; we regenerate the implantation area with injection of stem cell enriched fat tissue. Regeneration of cells in target area before FUE transplantation with the support of stromal stem cells results in higher rate of alive thicker hair follicles
Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) is a harvesting method. Different clinics may give it a fancy name to
Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) is a harvesting method. Different clinics may give it a fancy name for marketing purposes. You should worry more about the final results than how to harvest the hair.
You might also like...
I would like to put it in a more straightforward way:
There are no such surgical methods in medical literature as 'Bio FUE' or 'Direct FUE'.
These are made up names of a known method (FUE) to do re-marketing in such a way that it causes the illusion in the patients mind that the clinic offering these methods are using 'newer methods'.
In fact, I would advice patients to stay away from clinics that do this, as this strategy proves that the clinic is after gaining an advantage over competitors, not by depending on their surgical skills, but by depending on their marketing skills. Obviously, the latter does no good to the patients.
FUE vs Bio FUE vs Direct FUE
The truth is that it is pretty much just a fancy way of saying the same thing. You will get the same result for the most part.
Bio FUE is a process that allegedly enhances your result by speeding up healing and increasing the yield of transplanted hairs by using a form of PRP.
Direct FUE is when the follicles are implanted directly after being harvested.
Both of these may be advancements in the field of FUE, but nothing very solid has been shown to make them any more successful then a "regular" FUE done by an experienced hair transplant specialist.
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.