Application of Botox to the nose is fairly limited and it is mostly done to relax the depressor muscle of nasal tip which is mostly noted during animation (laughing) to pull the nasal tip down. A more rare application would be to decrease the flare of nasal ala on animation again, but it can compromise the function of the external nasal valve and as such predisposing the patient to obstructive symptoms. The discussion on non-surgical nose job mostly refers to application of fillers to the nose. It can serve two categorical purposes: camouflage, and augmentation. When it comes to camouflage, it can target asymmetries between the two sides or be applied as a blanket over the areas of thin skin overlying skeletal deformities. However, by doing so the drawback could be loss of some of the nuances of the natural variation of the nasal skin thickness. In other words, this maneuver can only serve a "filling" function in areas of the nose where "sculpting" is the real goal. Human eye can detect submillimeter imperfections of the nose, and this procedure inherently lacks that degree of precision an experienced rhinoplasty surgeon aims to deliver. When it comes to the augmentation aspect of the procedure, the target is to increase height or length in certain areas, thus changing some proportions and angles of the nose to more favorable ones. The most common areas for this purpose are the nasal dorsum (bridge) and nasal tip. This is a more achievable goal as long as only small increment changes are needed. If major changes, otherwise requiring sizable cartilage graft or silicon implant are in mind, a filler augmentation is best to be avoided. First off, In such scenarios, the filler will likely not be able to mimic the robust structure of grafts/implants with meaningful longevity and neutrality, and more importantly, large volume injections can majorly increase the risk of serious complications known to occur due to vascular compromise in non-surgical rhinoplasty. As far as the cost is concerned, the pricing goes with the amount and type of the filler used and the complexity of the case. This could start from $700-800 for a vial of filler in most specialty practices, and most commonly hyaluronic acid based fillers (which are dissolvable in case of unfavorable outcome) such as Resylane and Juvederm are used. However, as these fillers have duration of less than a year, the long term cost with repeating the procedure annually (with the optimistic assumption that each time a favorable outcome is achieved), should be weighed against the cost of a surgical rhinoplasty. In a nutshell, non-surgical rhinoplasty should be looked at as a procedure suited for a subset of rhinoplasty patients with unique advantages and limitations. Given the complexity of the decision making, far beyond its cost concerns, it is best to consult with a surgeon who is truly subspecialized in rhinoplasty as mainstay of his or her practice, to be able to guide you with a plan that optimally suits your aesthetic goals.