The lower eyelid is the trickiest and most complication prone area in the body to operate on. Every single operation produces more scar tissue. The surgeon and patient must decide carefully on expected benefits, as well as the risks and benefits of each procedure. Every surgery, from the first to the revision cases should have a very specific plan to reduce againg, but also to protect the eyelid from scarring and from changing its shape. Changing the eye shape inadvertently can give a bizarre, operated appearance, or a staring appearance to the eye, not to mention problems with dry eye or even corneal damage. In our practice, revision lower eyelid surgery, more likely than not, involves a cheeklift to restore the eye shape to a pleasing almond shape from a rounded appearance that is often seen after conventional subciliary blepharoplasties. Often revision surgeries will involve placement of grafts into hollow areas (i.e. LiveFill), elevation of the cheeks, restoration of the canthus (corner of the eye), possibly replacement of tissue lost to scar tissue. We have several articles and book chapters on our website drbrent.com for specific discussions of these issues. So the question is why should so many repeat surgeries be necessary on the lower eyelid? Is the patient chasing any morsel of fat that appears at the base of a prominent globe? Is there hollowness that is distracting from the appearance of the eye that could be treated in other ways? The eye protrudes more in some patients than others. This causes a "chain reaction" of effects on the lower eyelid fat, the upper eyelid configuration etc. Does the patient have a prominent globe? Are the patient's needs reasonable or are they risky? These are all issues to address before a trip to the operating room.