I’m currently a 42J wanting to go to a C cup. I’m almost 50, long done with breastfeeding and don’t have a sexual interest in nipples. In research on a reduction from my size it’s clear I’d need FNG which seems like it’s unnecessary extra stitches, risks and healing. I’d like to just have the reduction without re-attachment of the nipples. I read that insurance might not cover it that way - but if I’m having plenty of tissue removed based on the medical necessity criteria why would it matter?
Answers (4)
From board-certified doctors and trusted medical professionals
December 4, 2021
Answer: Breast reduction without nipple areolar replacement...insurance covered?
1 person found this helpful
December 4, 2021
Answer: Breast reduction without nipple areolar replacement...insurance covered?