Is incision under the breast the most popular / safest?
Answer: We love the transaxillary approach Hi Elli. Thank you for your Question.Although many surgeons prefer the inframammary incision, current literature on incisions shows that the complication rates is the same among both transaxillary and inframammary incisions.The best incision should minimize scarring, allow safe pocket creation and safe implant insertion.The incision site is a decision that should be based on your preference along with your surgeon’s skillset in the particular incision. Your surgeon may recommend one incision over another depending on the incision’s ability to allow appropriate insertion of the implant while controlling surgical variables and reducing contamination and bleeding.With regards to the transaxillary incision, it is best for patients who have concerns for scars, who have sufficient breast tissue and normal breast shape, and who have a small areola (dark region around the nipple), or requires a small silicone or saline implant.Pros of the transaxillary (Arm pit) incision:No scars will exist on the breastThere is less trauma to surrounding breast tissues while dissecting an implant pocketIt allows surgeons to achieve hemostasis (blood-less dissection) thereby preventing hematoma where blood accumulates in the tissuesGiven optimal skill sets, you can place all types’ implants precisely into the surgical pocket.Cons of the transaxillary (arm pit) incision:If reoperations are required, an additional incision using the inframammary or periareolar approach is required to optimize control and accuracyThe axillary approach is not good for patients with tuberous breasts, constricted breasts, or with severe sagging.This approach can have an increased risk for implant malposition in the upper pole of the breast because of poor visualization of the inframammary fold.Great caution is required to prevent trauma to lymphatic vessels which are part of our immune systemYou can only do behind the muscle implant placement In many aspects, the inframammary approach surpasses the other incision locations and is best suited for patients who have a small areola (dark pigmented skin around the nipple), patients with breast sagging, and those who require large volume implants or form-stable implants. Compared to the under the armpit incision, the inframammary incision (under the breast) allows direct vision, less trauma to breast tissue, easier and precise pocket dissection, and undamaged insertion of the implants.Bottomline: Incision site depends on your scar preference, your implant size, and surgeon’s preferenceIt would be best to consult with a board-certified plastic surgeon.Hope this helps.
Helpful
Answer: We love the transaxillary approach Hi Elli. Thank you for your Question.Although many surgeons prefer the inframammary incision, current literature on incisions shows that the complication rates is the same among both transaxillary and inframammary incisions.The best incision should minimize scarring, allow safe pocket creation and safe implant insertion.The incision site is a decision that should be based on your preference along with your surgeon’s skillset in the particular incision. Your surgeon may recommend one incision over another depending on the incision’s ability to allow appropriate insertion of the implant while controlling surgical variables and reducing contamination and bleeding.With regards to the transaxillary incision, it is best for patients who have concerns for scars, who have sufficient breast tissue and normal breast shape, and who have a small areola (dark region around the nipple), or requires a small silicone or saline implant.Pros of the transaxillary (Arm pit) incision:No scars will exist on the breastThere is less trauma to surrounding breast tissues while dissecting an implant pocketIt allows surgeons to achieve hemostasis (blood-less dissection) thereby preventing hematoma where blood accumulates in the tissuesGiven optimal skill sets, you can place all types’ implants precisely into the surgical pocket.Cons of the transaxillary (arm pit) incision:If reoperations are required, an additional incision using the inframammary or periareolar approach is required to optimize control and accuracyThe axillary approach is not good for patients with tuberous breasts, constricted breasts, or with severe sagging.This approach can have an increased risk for implant malposition in the upper pole of the breast because of poor visualization of the inframammary fold.Great caution is required to prevent trauma to lymphatic vessels which are part of our immune systemYou can only do behind the muscle implant placement In many aspects, the inframammary approach surpasses the other incision locations and is best suited for patients who have a small areola (dark pigmented skin around the nipple), patients with breast sagging, and those who require large volume implants or form-stable implants. Compared to the under the armpit incision, the inframammary incision (under the breast) allows direct vision, less trauma to breast tissue, easier and precise pocket dissection, and undamaged insertion of the implants.Bottomline: Incision site depends on your scar preference, your implant size, and surgeon’s preferenceIt would be best to consult with a board-certified plastic surgeon.Hope this helps.
Helpful
June 6, 2016
Answer: Breast augmenation incision Transaxillary (armpit) incision offers the advantage of a less noticeable scar than fold or incisions around the areola. However, large silicone implants cannot be placed this way and the dissection through this approach can sometimes lead to the implants falling out toward the armpit. It is not my preferred approach.
Helpful
June 6, 2016
Answer: Breast augmenation incision Transaxillary (armpit) incision offers the advantage of a less noticeable scar than fold or incisions around the areola. However, large silicone implants cannot be placed this way and the dissection through this approach can sometimes lead to the implants falling out toward the armpit. It is not my preferred approach.
Helpful
June 5, 2016
Answer: Breast Augmentation Incisions Hello,Bottom line: There is very good data in our plastic surgery literature that shows the inframammary incision is the best in terms of lowest complication rate, next the trans-axillary, and then finally the periareolar incision. World wide, the inframammary incision is most popular. In Southern California, the periareolar incision is most popular, despite its high rate of complications. If you choose trans-axillary, be sure your surgeon uses an endoscope and electro-cautery; there should be no blind or blunt dissection. Additionally, a Keller funnel needs to be used as well. Best of luck!
Helpful
June 5, 2016
Answer: Breast Augmentation Incisions Hello,Bottom line: There is very good data in our plastic surgery literature that shows the inframammary incision is the best in terms of lowest complication rate, next the trans-axillary, and then finally the periareolar incision. World wide, the inframammary incision is most popular. In Southern California, the periareolar incision is most popular, despite its high rate of complications. If you choose trans-axillary, be sure your surgeon uses an endoscope and electro-cautery; there should be no blind or blunt dissection. Additionally, a Keller funnel needs to be used as well. Best of luck!
Helpful
June 5, 2016
Answer: Armpit incision for breast implants I believe there are really no cons to performing breast augmentation through an armpit incision by an experienced surgeon using an endoscopic approach. However, some surgeons do perform breast augmentation with this incision, using a blind and blunt approach. I feel this increases the risk of contracture and malposition of the implant. Using an endoscopic approach, I believe you have the same degree of control and precision as other approaches for implant placement. This does take additional training, specialized equipment and experience to perform properly.Aloha,Shim Ching, MD
Helpful
June 5, 2016
Answer: Armpit incision for breast implants I believe there are really no cons to performing breast augmentation through an armpit incision by an experienced surgeon using an endoscopic approach. However, some surgeons do perform breast augmentation with this incision, using a blind and blunt approach. I feel this increases the risk of contracture and malposition of the implant. Using an endoscopic approach, I believe you have the same degree of control and precision as other approaches for implant placement. This does take additional training, specialized equipment and experience to perform properly.Aloha,Shim Ching, MD
Helpful
June 5, 2016
Answer: What are the pros and cons of through the arm pit sub muscular implant procedure? Thank you for your question. In my experience, many women prefer the transaxillary approach to breast augmentation as it leaves absolutely no scar on the breast. The scar is very well hidden under the arm pit and is virtually undetectable after a 3-6 months. Plastic surgeons who are experienced with this approach have no more problem with asymmetry than with any other approach. As with any technique, experience of the plastic surgeon is paramount. I use the transaxillary approach with saline, silicone gel and Ideal implants with excellent results. In fact, one of the advantages of trans-axillary saline implants, is the lowest rate of capsular contracture.I have done both trans-axillary and infra-mammary breast augmentation for over 30 years and have not seen any more problems with asymmetry or malposition with the trans-axillary approach than the infra-mammary approach. Most surgeons have a preferred technique, often based on their training and clinical experience. When done properly, both of these approaches are safe and will provide a nice result. The infra-mammary approach is more common, but not necessarily a better option for you. I hope this is helpful. Good luck to you.
Helpful
June 5, 2016
Answer: What are the pros and cons of through the arm pit sub muscular implant procedure? Thank you for your question. In my experience, many women prefer the transaxillary approach to breast augmentation as it leaves absolutely no scar on the breast. The scar is very well hidden under the arm pit and is virtually undetectable after a 3-6 months. Plastic surgeons who are experienced with this approach have no more problem with asymmetry than with any other approach. As with any technique, experience of the plastic surgeon is paramount. I use the transaxillary approach with saline, silicone gel and Ideal implants with excellent results. In fact, one of the advantages of trans-axillary saline implants, is the lowest rate of capsular contracture.I have done both trans-axillary and infra-mammary breast augmentation for over 30 years and have not seen any more problems with asymmetry or malposition with the trans-axillary approach than the infra-mammary approach. Most surgeons have a preferred technique, often based on their training and clinical experience. When done properly, both of these approaches are safe and will provide a nice result. The infra-mammary approach is more common, but not necessarily a better option for you. I hope this is helpful. Good luck to you.
Helpful
