What amount of breast tissue is preferred for subglandular placement?

Hello, I think you will find that each surgeon's criteria for tissue thickness over subglandular implants is different, but more coverage is always better. I personally like to be able to pinch at least 2-3cm of tissue for implants inserted in the subglandular or subfascial plane. However, the answer is actually more nuanced, because some people have adequate breast tissue thickness yet they have a wide space between their breasts (sternal gap) with little tissue between the breasts. If a person with this type of anatomy wants me to put the implants closer together to help close the gap, there will be a relatively thin layer of tissue covering the implants in the centre of the chest. This could lead to visible or palpable implant rippling in the cleavage area. This is why it is important to have a proper consultation with an experienced breast surgeon to assess your unique anatomy before making a decision. As you already have been so a few in-person assessments, these surgeons will be your best source of advice.

If the thickness of your subcutaneous tissue is at least 1.5 to 2 cm over the medial and upper part of the breast, then subglandular or subfascial placement should work. Use a more cohesive gel implant for minimizing rippling. If you aren't a candidate for this then look into split muscle, which minimizes animation deformity like you can get with dual plane, but still have muscle coverage over the upper and medial parts of the breast.

As a bodybuilder, I augment professional athletes frequently. I think for those people in whom the living is made by athletic performance, the implant can be placed above the muscle. Other patients will be happier long term with submuscular (dual plane). During your consults the plastic surgeons should be able to tell you which implant placement is best for you.