Promoted Local Answer
Promoted local answers are based on Featured Doctor activity
within your current location.
Have you tried sizers on at your plastic surgeon's office? That can give you a better idea of what those volumes added to your own tissues will achieve...not in shape, but in volume filling out a bra cup. As mentioned, the 30cc difference is a very mild one. Judging by the photos of your desired result, I think that 325cc implants will look good and you probably need that volume to achieve the size and shape you desire. Also, since your "desired look" has a fuller upper pole, though not overly so, I am not sure what the anatomic implant does for you as compared to a round implant, since the upper pole with the anatomic shaped (and somewhat firmer) implant will give you less upper pole fill.
You're talking about a one ounce (30cc) difference!
Let the surgeon, if he's/she's qualified (Board Certified by ABPS) and experienced, make the decision as to what best fits in the space you have available. If you don't trust him/her to make that decision - then find another surgeon, one you can trust. After all you're putting your life, looks and a lot of money in their hands and if you don't trust them with a shot glass worth of size decision - go somewhere else. Also, if you're that obsessed with such small differences - maybe you should rethink your decision to have surgery completely. Plastic surgery is the art and science of improvement. Perfection while a goal is just not realistic.
I believe a 295cc implant is large enough for you at this point. Your skin is tight and it does not take much to greatly enhance the appearance of your breasts. Good luck.
Difference between 295 and 325 is very little. Either one will give you a nice result....personally, I'd pick the 325s.
Thank you for the pictures.
I definitely think that the 325 cc will give your breast a great change, more volume and cleavage.
If I were to "guess" I would opt for the 325s but using UHP implants instead of anatomies. But You need to be re examined to make sure you are OK with the decision..//
The size difference between the two is minimal and unlikely to make a big difference. Keep in mind that if the implant is being placed under the muscle, you will lose about 30cc of size. If women are unhappy with sizing, they usually wish they had gone bigger.
my patients are always told go with the larger one. And no one has ever regretted it. The biggest complaint in my practice is "I wish I went larger" AND the dimensions of the different implants you are considering are only millimeters. And if you think you are too large with the 325, you would have had the same impression with the 295 size. An ounce difference (2 tablespoons) is really nothing to fret over.
If you following the logic of getting implants that fit your body. It may help you get more comfortable with the process. You can also get a another opinion and if you do Please find an experienced Board Certified Plastic Surgeon and member of the Aesthetic Society using the Smart Beauty Guide. These Plastic Surgeons can guide you on all aspects of facial surgery, breast augmentation and body procedures including tummy tucks or mommy makeovers!
Thank you for your question. Based on your photograph I concur with your surgeon 325 cc is more likely to achieve the look that you say you want however to 95 is very close and should be almost as good.
I also am not a fan shaped implants. They have to be placed exactly as as they do not adjust to the breast and body shape as well as round implants. I used round implants in 99% of the patient's that I treat and have for 31 years. I am not certain what benefit there would be for you to shaped implants as the desired look picture that you provide has a nice round breast with fullness above the areola. The shaped anatomical implant will emphasize volume below the nipple areola.