Fraxel Repair Vs. Total FX (Active FX with Deep FX) - Which is Better?

asked 4 years ago by anon
Latest answer by Rick Rosen, MD
Question viewed 13,501 times
Tags: face, comparison

Now that Fraxel has put out the new Fraxel repair laser, I am wondering if I should get that instead of the Active FX plus Deep FX treatment I planned to get next month. A lot of people are saying the Fraxel repair laser is really good...is it better than the Active FX and Deep FX combination? Which is more expensive?

5 answers to Fraxel Repair Vs. Total FX (Active FX with Deep FX) - Which is Better?

Fraxel Repair vs other Micro Fractional Carbon Dioxide Lasers

There is alot of confusion, for both patients and physicians about the Micro Fractional Carbon Dioxide Lasers. First and most important is that the Carbon Dioxide laser is the Gold standard for tightening, smoothing, decreasing pigment and lifting sun damage skin. Its wavelength is 10,600 nanometers. All Lasers with a lower wavelength less than this will not work as well as this wavelength. Therefore patients, really need to look for this wavelength, rather than a specific name of a laser.... more

Michael Tomcik, MD
San Ramon Dermatologist

All Fractional CO2 Lasers are comparable

The key to best cosmetic and medical outcome from Fractional CO2 Laser Resurfacing is not the specific brand of laser, but rather the expertise and experience of the board-certified dermatologist or plastic surgeon and his or her team of care providers. Make sure your aesthetic team has the experience in treating your specific skin type, preferably more than 50 cases. Specific pre-op and post-op skin care routines must be customized for individual priorities and needs, e.g. acne scar,... more

William Ting, MD
Bay Area Dermatologic Surgeon

www.DrWilliamTing.com

Fraxel repair is similar to Deep FX with no Active FX

From the way the laser is structured, the Fraxel repair device is very similar to the Deep FX laser in that the micro beams the laser produces are about 130 microns in size. That is the limit for the fraxel repair. In additon to the microbeams, the Active FX produces larger diameter beams which are better for surface treatment. Because of the greater versatility of the Lumenis UltraPulse the laser could be considered to be a better choice.

Richard Gentile, MD
Cleveland Facial Plastic Surgeon

www.facialplastics.org

Active fx vs fraxel

CO2 lasers are CO2 lasers. Fraxel is 4 different types of lasers with their most aggressive being the restore. I use palomars artisan, as I believe now that erbium lasers in fractional mode with deep non ablative treatments at the same time are showing the same results as when I used CO2 but with less pain , and less down time, and less risk of complications.

Rick Rosen, MD
Norwalk Plastic Surgeon

Fraxel re:pair is what we use in Columbus, Ohio

My obvious bias is the Fraxel re:pair that I have in my office. When we made the decision to add a fractional CO2 laser to our services, we looked at multiple different platforms. In my opinion, when a laser company produces a laser - and remember that lasers are designed to work at specific wavelengths to achieve their goals - that they claim can do everything from facial resurfacing to hair removal to tattoos, that they have a laser that does a lot of things "OK... more

Jason Brett Lichten, MD
Columbus Plastic Surgeon

Ask a question

Get Free Email Updates