I am stuck between choosing 520cc and 560cc. Is there a noticeable difference? My bwd is 13cm. I’m quite deflated after breastfeeding and looking to achieve a full breast with some subtle roundness. When I tried the 560s on at my consult I felt they were a bit big but was told they’d look more like the 520cc once they’re in. (I liked how the 520s looked). I really don’t want to look top heavy which is why I’m nervous to commit to 560.
August 1, 2019
Answer: 520 cc vs. 560 cc Patients often think in terms of cup size when considering augmentation. Unfortunately, devices are sized in terms of milliliters (cc) of volume. This can lead to some confusion when sizing. Additionally, it is important to remember that cup size itself is not standardized with variations from one manufacturer to another. Unfortunately, as many women can attest their cup size in an industry leader such as VS is not necessarily transferable to another brand. Another point which is often under appreciated is that of anatomy and starting point. Any implant will add volume to the volume which is already present. The implant is additive. A particular volume will not necessarily confer the same cup size to different patients (often times it will not even confer the same cup size to different breasts in the same individual...remember they are "sisters" not "twins"). A general rule of thumb is that 125cc can represent somewhere between 1/2 to a full cup size increase. Smaller volume differentials (25-50cc) are typically less consequential representing a volume change of less than a shot glass. However, I have found these numbers, at least anecdotally, to be of little help. Patients often present with notions/goals which do not correlate with these sorts of sterile volumetric assessments. When sizing patients, there are a number of useful tools including: -3D imaging (has the added benefit of offering a volumetric analysis of the pre-operative breast) -Breast sizers (rice bags) -Goal photos I also recommend that patients commit to a particular look rather than a cup size. Once a patient settles on a look that pleases them the overall cup size increase becomes less relevant.The key to obtaining a natural result is to stay within the parameters defined by your BWD. This will ensure that you avoid the dreaded "fake" look. The question of "too big" or "large enough" is a relative question. The safest approach is to stay within the boundaries of your BWD. Beyond that, the choice is yours. Without measures, it is difficult to offer more concrete advice than that. I would not stress over a 40 cc differential as this will have a subtle affect on outcome (40 cc is less than the volume of a shot glass or 8 teaspoons). With regards to sizers, they give a good approximation of volume (i.e. how you will fill out a garment?). However, post op shape is difficult to predict based on sizers alone. As always, discuss your concerns with a board certified plastic surgeon (ABPS).
Helpful
August 1, 2019
Answer: 520 cc vs. 560 cc Patients often think in terms of cup size when considering augmentation. Unfortunately, devices are sized in terms of milliliters (cc) of volume. This can lead to some confusion when sizing. Additionally, it is important to remember that cup size itself is not standardized with variations from one manufacturer to another. Unfortunately, as many women can attest their cup size in an industry leader such as VS is not necessarily transferable to another brand. Another point which is often under appreciated is that of anatomy and starting point. Any implant will add volume to the volume which is already present. The implant is additive. A particular volume will not necessarily confer the same cup size to different patients (often times it will not even confer the same cup size to different breasts in the same individual...remember they are "sisters" not "twins"). A general rule of thumb is that 125cc can represent somewhere between 1/2 to a full cup size increase. Smaller volume differentials (25-50cc) are typically less consequential representing a volume change of less than a shot glass. However, I have found these numbers, at least anecdotally, to be of little help. Patients often present with notions/goals which do not correlate with these sorts of sterile volumetric assessments. When sizing patients, there are a number of useful tools including: -3D imaging (has the added benefit of offering a volumetric analysis of the pre-operative breast) -Breast sizers (rice bags) -Goal photos I also recommend that patients commit to a particular look rather than a cup size. Once a patient settles on a look that pleases them the overall cup size increase becomes less relevant.The key to obtaining a natural result is to stay within the parameters defined by your BWD. This will ensure that you avoid the dreaded "fake" look. The question of "too big" or "large enough" is a relative question. The safest approach is to stay within the boundaries of your BWD. Beyond that, the choice is yours. Without measures, it is difficult to offer more concrete advice than that. I would not stress over a 40 cc differential as this will have a subtle affect on outcome (40 cc is less than the volume of a shot glass or 8 teaspoons). With regards to sizers, they give a good approximation of volume (i.e. how you will fill out a garment?). However, post op shape is difficult to predict based on sizers alone. As always, discuss your concerns with a board certified plastic surgeon (ABPS).
Helpful
April 3, 2018
Answer: When considering breast implant size most patients underestimate the ultimate volume that they The percentage difference between these two implants is very small. In general if you're debating between two sizes I would recommend going with the larger
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 3, 2018
Answer: When considering breast implant size most patients underestimate the ultimate volume that they The percentage difference between these two implants is very small. In general if you're debating between two sizes I would recommend going with the larger
Helpful 1 person found this helpful