41 year old with volume loss and some fat pads showing. I realize it fairly minor and surgery comes with risks like lid retraction. I have been evaluated by a facial plastic surgeon who described my under eyes as fairly tight and too minor for surgery but a second opinion surgeon said I'm a good candidate for trans conj bleph and fat pad re-draping to fill in volume loss. Is filler less risky?
October 29, 2024
Answer: Consider a transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty. Transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty is the surgical removal of under eye bulging fat pads through an incision on the inside of the lower eyelid. Based on your photos, you may indeed be a good candidate for this, however, an examination would be necessary. I hope this helps! Sincerely, Dr. Joseph
Helpful
October 29, 2024
Answer: Consider a transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty. Transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty is the surgical removal of under eye bulging fat pads through an incision on the inside of the lower eyelid. Based on your photos, you may indeed be a good candidate for this, however, an examination would be necessary. I hope this helps! Sincerely, Dr. Joseph
Helpful
October 24, 2024
Answer: Undereye Filler Hello! My name is Jessica, I am a physician assistant, and one of the providers at Aesthetic Skin in Winnetka and Chicago. This is a great question. Yes, using filler for volume loss under the eyes generally carries fewer risks compared to surgical options like transconjunctival blepharoplasty. While fillers can provide a more immediate and less invasive solution to restore volume and improve the appearance of under-eye hollows, it’s important to choose a skilled injector who understands the delicate area around the eyes. Fillers can effectively smooth out minor volume loss without the risks associated with surgery, such as lid retraction or longer recovery times. However, the results are temporary, typically lasting from 6 months to 2 years, depending on the type of filler used. If you’re seeking a non-surgical option with minimal downtime, fillers could be a suitable choice for your concerns. I hope this helps and best of luck!
Helpful
October 24, 2024
Answer: Undereye Filler Hello! My name is Jessica, I am a physician assistant, and one of the providers at Aesthetic Skin in Winnetka and Chicago. This is a great question. Yes, using filler for volume loss under the eyes generally carries fewer risks compared to surgical options like transconjunctival blepharoplasty. While fillers can provide a more immediate and less invasive solution to restore volume and improve the appearance of under-eye hollows, it’s important to choose a skilled injector who understands the delicate area around the eyes. Fillers can effectively smooth out minor volume loss without the risks associated with surgery, such as lid retraction or longer recovery times. However, the results are temporary, typically lasting from 6 months to 2 years, depending on the type of filler used. If you’re seeking a non-surgical option with minimal downtime, fillers could be a suitable choice for your concerns. I hope this helps and best of luck!
Helpful
