and which one is better?
Hello there Well basically implants behind the muscle have a softer upper pole - you avoid seeing a sharp edge .And there is less risk of going hard [capsular contracture] behind the muscle .So generally it is more common to put implants behind the muscle [dual plane] . However you get more distortion on animation - when you flex the pecs - if the implants is behind the muscle . This can be a big problem in a body builder for example .Now many other factors come in to play .Raising the sheath ]fascia] off the muscle can help hide the upper border of the implant even if it is in front of the muscle .And implants are better hidden if you have more breast tissue or soft tissue there so they are less obvious even if you are in front of the muscle .It was thought that implants look bigger in front of the muscle but in fact a study has shown that due to the pressure effect of the implant on the breast tissue you get thinning of the breast tissue and this is actually more marked if the implant is in front of the muscle . So that makes the result look smaller if the implants are in front of the muscle .You can get good results with wither pocket . It depends on many features that should be discussed in your consultation .CheersTS
The most common placement of a breast implant in the US is in the subpectoral (or dual plane) position. This uses the pectoralis muscle to cover the top three quarters of the implant where you need the most coverage, while allowing the breast to feel soft and not be constricted by any other musculature. It provides a protective effect against capsular contracture compared to the subglandular placement ( above the muscle), and the muscle still has all its normal function. I recommend going fro a few consultations with board certified plastic surgeons and see what will work best for you. I hope this helps.