I have fibrocystic breast disease. I had 1 suspicious lump biopsied but it was benign. I have extremely dense breast tissue. I know breast fat transfer may cause calcifications and cysts due to some of transferred fat dying, which can make breast cancer detection trickier. Since I already have fibrocystic, I wasn’t sure if that would cause further difficulty in breast cancer detection if I got a fat transfer. I was also concerned the fat transfer may cause more breast lumps. Don't want implants.
May 30, 2017
Answer: Impact of Fibrocystic Breast Disease Upon Breast Fat Transfer In and of itself, fibrocystic disease should not impact breast augmentation or the outcome of the surgery. You should continue with annual mammograms for early detection of any breast lumps.
Helpful
May 30, 2017
Answer: Impact of Fibrocystic Breast Disease Upon Breast Fat Transfer In and of itself, fibrocystic disease should not impact breast augmentation or the outcome of the surgery. You should continue with annual mammograms for early detection of any breast lumps.
Helpful
May 31, 2017
Answer: Strai Fat injections to the breast can be successful. But to get enough volume to have a meaningful result usually requires multiple sessions. Serial injections can be costly and this fact can make implant augmentation more attractive. Mammographic appearance of fat is frequently indistinguishable from normal breast. The dystrophic calcifications that can occur from fat injections are different in nature from those found in cancer. Oil cysts from fat also have a distinct appearance. Thus far the jury is out with regards to cancer detection and fat augmentation. The data is sparse but I would predict fat demonstrates less obstruction to mammography then implants. So it is not unreasonable to proceed with fat from that standpoint. Fibrocystic disease poses minor technical problems with fat injections but otherwise is not a contraindication. I hope this helps.
Helpful 2 people found this helpful
May 31, 2017
Answer: Strai Fat injections to the breast can be successful. But to get enough volume to have a meaningful result usually requires multiple sessions. Serial injections can be costly and this fact can make implant augmentation more attractive. Mammographic appearance of fat is frequently indistinguishable from normal breast. The dystrophic calcifications that can occur from fat injections are different in nature from those found in cancer. Oil cysts from fat also have a distinct appearance. Thus far the jury is out with regards to cancer detection and fat augmentation. The data is sparse but I would predict fat demonstrates less obstruction to mammography then implants. So it is not unreasonable to proceed with fat from that standpoint. Fibrocystic disease poses minor technical problems with fat injections but otherwise is not a contraindication. I hope this helps.
Helpful 2 people found this helpful