I am a 40 year old women with moderate sun damage, some fine lines around the eyes & red marks/small indents on my cheeks from Acne. I have been told the Pearl (nonfractional) goes 100 microns deep into the skin vs 1000 microns for a Pearl Fractional, & that is the same depth as an IPL. Is this correct & if so, can I really expect better results from the Pearl (non-fractional) than an IPL? Can you tell me what to expect for the recovery period for the Pearl compared to the IPL and Fractional?
Answers (3)
From board-certified doctors and trusted medical professionals
MOST RECENT
July 1, 2024
Answer: For brown spots and fine lines it is recommended to do Clear & Brilliant. Acne scars can be treated with resurfacing lasers.
Make sure that the vinegar soaks you are using are not too concentrated (otherwise it can burn) - it should be 1 teaspoon per 2 cups of water. Soak gauze in the solution and spread it out over the treated areas, keeping it in place for 20-30 minutes - more like a compress. Then apply...
Hi Blah Blah Baby Down Under,
I think that both technologies give very good results. I am very familar with Fraxel repair , having experience with it over the past two years since it's debut.
I have seen before and after pictures of Pearl fractional which looked good. I have not seen any...
The Pearl laser is total shallow resurfacing technique that does an excellent job on minor sun damage. The Pearl fractional is a deeper treatment but delivers fractionated coverage (checkerboard) attempting to get the results of a total CO2 resurfacing (very aggressive treatment) without...