Active FX Vs. Fraxel Laser Treatments - Which is Better?

Fraxel re:store involves a series of 3 to 5 treatments while Active Fx involves a single, sometimes a second treatment. They both give good results. Active FX is a very superficial treatment for sun damaged skin.
Fraxel re:pair in a single treatment gives much better results than Active FX. To get results similar to Fraxel re:pair, a Deep FX treatment needs to be added to the Active FX treatment. Be well.
Dr. P

Fractional CO2 laser allows for effective laser resurfacing with one week of downtime with much less risks of complications associated with the old CO2 laser resurfacing. There is not a significant difference among the different Fractional CO2 laser available in the marketplace, e.g. ActiveFx, Fraxel Repair, Mixto, eCO2. The key is the experience of the laser surgeon. Make sure the before and after photos shown are his or her own patients. Preferably, your board-certified laser surgeon has performed more than 50 cases of your skin type.

The Active (and Deep) FX lasers are more powerful than ALL other fractionated lasers. More power means quicker healing and less pain with possible less side effects. The Active/Deep FX laser is more expensive than ALL other lasers. That is why most doctors have the cheaper lasers. You only have one face, make sure the best laser is used.

While both Fraxel and ActiveFX laser technologies function in a similar manner, they are two distinctively different lasers. Fraxel technology delivers fractionated Erbium laser energy while ActiveFX utlizes fractionated energy from a carbon dioxide laser. Even though the two are similar, the increased heat provided by the ActiveFX appears to result in more effective skin tightening and, overall, better results.

Let
me start by saying that not all skin types (pigment) are safe for all
lasers.  Fraxel laser was, in its day, a breakthrough device in the
world of fractional lasers.  Fractional lasers, instead of treating the
entire surface, instead puts individual beams of laser energy into the
tissue.  Depending of the wavelength of the laser, different things will
happen.  Fraxel (brand name of a fractional laser) helped get
fractional treatments started, but it is a wavelength that really can’t
achieve a whole lot.  It requires multiple treatments, is rather
painful, and the results are mild to moderate.
Active
FX is also a fractional laser (as opposed to full field), and uses the
ablative fractionated CO2 wavelength.  Active FX and Deep FX are much
more precise than the old full field and fractional CO2 lasers. 
Historically, CO2 lasers were not a good choice for patients with medium
or darker pigment.  Too much heat, resulting in complications such as
PIHP (post inflammatory hyperpigmentation) and/or scarring.  The newer
fractional CO2 layers have greatly sped up the delivery of the laser
energy, thereby reducing many of the complications previously associated
with CO2 lasers.
Depending
on the skin type of the patient, the issues we’re addressing, etc,
determines which laser I use.  Often I use the Active FX and Deep FX,
but many times I’ll choose erbium fractional laser or the Halo laser by
Sciton, which incorporates erbium (ablative laser that sees water only),
and the 1470nm laser that heats, but does not vaporize tissue.  The
Halo is colorblind, and the outcomes are fantastic for a variety of
issues for almost all patients.
I
feel it is imperative to understand the skin physiology of all
patients, and have a number of energy based tools and devices that can
be used individually, or in combination, to give stunning results.I  sometimes give patients this analogy:  you can take a Steinway grand piano, and an average pianist, and get a so so outcome.  Or,  you can take a concert pianist and put them on an old upright piano, and also get a so so outcome.  But, if you put a concert pianist on a Steinway
grand piano, the result can be amazing.  Excellent technology, combined
with a skilled medical laser specialist, yields the best and safest
results, and the highest patient satisfaction