Dear Doctors, I want to get a BA soon and I was wondering if there is a technique that is the safest against bottoming out, my biggest fear. I have minimal tissue (bra size 34AA) and my pocket width has been measured as 9.5cm by a surgeon and 11cm by another (which I found odd). That leads me to pick UTM, high profile gel implants. Preferred range 290 to 340cc and I'll let the doc decide. I hear great things about dual plane technique, is that good to avoid bottoming out in the future?
Answer: Bottoming out Dear MartiCo, bottoming out occurs when the implant falls below the current breast crease or inframammary line. It's more likely to happen with inframammary incisions, which is why I try not to use the inframammary approach to any breast surgery. Bottoming out can also occur if an implant is too large for the breast pocket. That is why it is important to choose an implant size that's correct for your body. I perform numerous measurements in the office to determine optimal implant size for my patient's bodies. If you are concerned, please check it with your plastic surgeon for reassurance and to further discuss your options and possibility of revision. Daniel Barrett, MDCertified, American Board of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Helpful
Answer: Bottoming out Dear MartiCo, bottoming out occurs when the implant falls below the current breast crease or inframammary line. It's more likely to happen with inframammary incisions, which is why I try not to use the inframammary approach to any breast surgery. Bottoming out can also occur if an implant is too large for the breast pocket. That is why it is important to choose an implant size that's correct for your body. I perform numerous measurements in the office to determine optimal implant size for my patient's bodies. If you are concerned, please check it with your plastic surgeon for reassurance and to further discuss your options and possibility of revision. Daniel Barrett, MDCertified, American Board of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Helpful
August 20, 2024
Answer: Avoiding bottoming out Implant selection is important to keep your risk of bottoming out low. Very large implants are too heavy for the tissues and can lead at times to bottoming out. Your choice to have the implants placed under the muscle will be helpful as the muscle will provide some support for the implant. We welcome you to visit us in our Houston office to learn more!
Helpful
August 20, 2024
Answer: Avoiding bottoming out Implant selection is important to keep your risk of bottoming out low. Very large implants are too heavy for the tissues and can lead at times to bottoming out. Your choice to have the implants placed under the muscle will be helpful as the muscle will provide some support for the implant. We welcome you to visit us in our Houston office to learn more!
Helpful
August 20, 2024
Answer: Bottoming out To avoid bottoming out, place the implant behind the muscle for better support and avoid implants too large and heavy for your frame and tissue. Your surgeon should not lower your lower breast fold, also.
Helpful
August 20, 2024
Answer: Bottoming out To avoid bottoming out, place the implant behind the muscle for better support and avoid implants too large and heavy for your frame and tissue. Your surgeon should not lower your lower breast fold, also.
Helpful
August 19, 2024
Answer: Bottoming out I am troubled by the term 'bottoming out' because it attaches some stigma to something which is most principally caused by the characteristics of your own tissues and not by the choice and execution of surgical technique/implant etc and also its something that is not necessarily unattractive when you consider that there is no such thing as a 'normal' breast. its all to do with the stretch that comes with having an implant or from changing the shape of breast with breast uplift or breast reduction technique - if the lower pole of the breast stretches out more than the upper part then this makes the lower part of the breast seem fuller. There is some subjectivity with measuring pocket or base dimensions so i am not surprised if there is a difference in the way this has been measured. under-muscle and 'dual plane' are very similar techniques - dual plane just sounds a bit more flash. either way the muscle only covers the upper 50% or so of the implant so it doesn't defend against stretch in the lower part of the breast - the reason to go under muscle is to reduce the chance of feeling implants through the surface in the upper zone of the breast and also it will hvae a slight flattening effect on round implants - so if you have very thin skin here - test by pinching up the skin midway between nipple and collar bone - if less than half an inch of pinch then I would recommend placing implant under the pec muscle. things which might help to minimise lower pole stretch in my view are: 1. err on side of choosing a smaller implant 2. consider an anatomic implant as you have better control of shape 3. ensure that there is as little disturbance as possible to under-breast fold (IMF) the IMF is there because of a zone of tiny ligaments which hold the skin closer to ribs - so access scar and internal dissection should stay nicely on the upper side of this zone in order to give maximum possible support and hopefully minimise lower pole stretch/descent
Helpful
August 19, 2024
Answer: Bottoming out I am troubled by the term 'bottoming out' because it attaches some stigma to something which is most principally caused by the characteristics of your own tissues and not by the choice and execution of surgical technique/implant etc and also its something that is not necessarily unattractive when you consider that there is no such thing as a 'normal' breast. its all to do with the stretch that comes with having an implant or from changing the shape of breast with breast uplift or breast reduction technique - if the lower pole of the breast stretches out more than the upper part then this makes the lower part of the breast seem fuller. There is some subjectivity with measuring pocket or base dimensions so i am not surprised if there is a difference in the way this has been measured. under-muscle and 'dual plane' are very similar techniques - dual plane just sounds a bit more flash. either way the muscle only covers the upper 50% or so of the implant so it doesn't defend against stretch in the lower part of the breast - the reason to go under muscle is to reduce the chance of feeling implants through the surface in the upper zone of the breast and also it will hvae a slight flattening effect on round implants - so if you have very thin skin here - test by pinching up the skin midway between nipple and collar bone - if less than half an inch of pinch then I would recommend placing implant under the pec muscle. things which might help to minimise lower pole stretch in my view are: 1. err on side of choosing a smaller implant 2. consider an anatomic implant as you have better control of shape 3. ensure that there is as little disturbance as possible to under-breast fold (IMF) the IMF is there because of a zone of tiny ligaments which hold the skin closer to ribs - so access scar and internal dissection should stay nicely on the upper side of this zone in order to give maximum possible support and hopefully minimise lower pole stretch/descent
Helpful
August 18, 2024
Answer: Avoiding bottoming out. The best way to avoid bottoming out is to choose an implant that fits within the normal boundries of your breasts and preserves your natural inframammary fold. The inframammary folds strength prevents inferior migration of an implant, so choosing an implant which would require lowering the fold and creation of a new fold using sutures, to accommodate a larger implant is possible, but the re-created fold is never as strong as the native fold. Other options for creating a fold below your native fold would be the use of a reinforcing material such as Galaflex, which is a mesh sutured in at the level of the new fold and incorporates into your bodies tissues, but creates a stronger lower fold than could be obtained with sutures alone, although at an increase cost. Dual plane pockets, simply referred to the different amounts the pectoral muscle is divided and separated from the breast tissue to achieve optimal shape in a breast augmentation. Best wishes.
Helpful
August 18, 2024
Answer: Avoiding bottoming out. The best way to avoid bottoming out is to choose an implant that fits within the normal boundries of your breasts and preserves your natural inframammary fold. The inframammary folds strength prevents inferior migration of an implant, so choosing an implant which would require lowering the fold and creation of a new fold using sutures, to accommodate a larger implant is possible, but the re-created fold is never as strong as the native fold. Other options for creating a fold below your native fold would be the use of a reinforcing material such as Galaflex, which is a mesh sutured in at the level of the new fold and incorporates into your bodies tissues, but creates a stronger lower fold than could be obtained with sutures alone, although at an increase cost. Dual plane pockets, simply referred to the different amounts the pectoral muscle is divided and separated from the breast tissue to achieve optimal shape in a breast augmentation. Best wishes.
Helpful