Gummy bear implants vs. Sientra implants
Confused about the terminology. Is a gummy bear implant always a Sientra implant? Is a Sientra implant always a gummy bear? Help, please!
Doctor Answers 15
Sientra breast implants are made by the Brazilian company Silimed, which
started in Rio de Janiero in 1978 to import French breast implants into
Brazil for growing plastic surgery use in that country. In 1981 Silimed
began to manufacture its products in Brazil, in a small
laboratory compatible with the technical requirements of the time. One
year later, it already exported to other countries in Latin America and,
in the following years, expanded to foreign markets, with products
geared towards various specialties.
Silimed began construction of a new factory in 1985, which started
to operate in early 1989. In 2000, a second factory was built,
starting its activities in 2003. After 35 years in the market, Silimed
operates with two factories in Brazil and exports to all five
continents.
In 1990, Silimed began manufacturing textured mammary implants. In 1999, Silimed received 510K approval from the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the USA for its textured and smooth silicone elastomer implants. [this information from Silimed's own website history of the company]
On March 9, 2012, Silimed's Sientra silicone gel mammary implants received FDA approval for sale in the USA. Silimed is the first manufacturer outside the USA whose silicone mammary implants, smooth and textured, are approved in the USA. Furthermore, Silimed became the first manufacturer in the world whose form-stable (teardrop shaped) textured silicone gel implants were approved in the US market. (Allergan--formerly Inamed--SUBSEQUENTLY received FDA approval for its style 410 textured-surface shaped highly cohesive silicone gel implants, the popularly-named "gummy bear" implants).
But because Sientra's high-strength, cohesive, form-stable (teardrop-shaped), textured-surface implants were actually first to be FDA-approved in this country (and because they have used that terminology in their website information about their implants), many now call these "gummy bear" implants as well. The terminology is therefore confusing, like calling every facial tissue "Kleenex" when it might actually be a Puffs, or every copy machine a Xerox, when it could be a Minolta. But you know what I mean.
Each of the 3 USA breast implant manufacturers has shaped, textured-surface cohesive (or ultra-cohesive) implants, and each manufacturer has their own patented or "trade secret" way of creating the textured surface--the "proprietary" texturing method. McGhan (now Allergan) implants use a lost-salt technique where salt crystals create the high and low spots of the texture, designed to promote tissue adherence and ingrowth. The salt is then washed away before implant sterilization. This tissue adherence is not unlike Velcro, but is not the "hook and fabric loop" structure that Velcro uses.
This texture mimicked the structural properties of polyurethane-covered implants from 2 1/2 decades ago, where tissue ingrowth was shown to reduce (or prevent) capsular contracture (CC). CC was much more common at that time, since breast implants were usually placed ABOVE the muscle and just below the breast tissue, where there was significant bacterial contamination from the normal bacteria within the breast ducts. The texturing was also thought to "break up" the unidirectional collagen scar fibers that aligned themselves along a smooth-surface implant, contracted, and formed CC. And it worked! CC rates diminished.
Mentor developed their own textured-surface implants (Siltex), and their method of creating the surface texture was also proprietary (and different). It was a stamping process that created a much more finely-grained or almost "fuzzy" surface. My own experience with these implants showed that tissue ingrowth and adherence did not happen with this type or method of texturing, and years of experience with saline textured-surface implants showed a higher leak rate.
Sientra's method of texturing implants leads to a texture much more similar to the Allergan texture, but their technique is, again, proprietary, meaning they have their own way of creating what they feel is a better texture designed to promote adherence, ingrowth, CC reduction, and implant rotation avoidance (since an upside-down teardrop-shaped implant or sideways-positioned implant that was "stuck" there looks really wonky!
We know from other areas of bioengineering (such as rough-surface titanium hip or other orthopedic implants) that human tissues do not adhere equally to all man-made textured surfaces or materials. But we do know that textured breast implants DO reduce CC, particularly when used above the muscle. But since most plastic surgeons now place their breast implants BELOW the muscles, and have learned that even without texture this reduces CC significantly, the place for texture below the muscle is less for prevention of CC than for prevention of rotation to an abnormal position!
We also know from X-ray studies of women with smooth round breast implants and women with textured teardrop-shaped implants, the round implants are actually teardrop-shaped when the woman is standing, and indistinguishable from textured teardrop-shaped implants. They looked identical! But when reclining, the smooth round implants assumed a flatter round shape and dropped slightly to the side of the chest, just like naturally large(r) breasts do, whereas the teardrop-shaped implants did not move and poked straight up in an unnatural still-teardrop shape, making these so-called "anatomic" implants LESS anatomic than the smooth round ones.
Sientra's website uses the term "gummy bear" implants, and even though "gummy bear" is not medical terminology, Sientra's marketing people are clever, and have chosen to use this popular lay term in its promotional materials. But Allergan's stylee 410 implants were actually the first ones to be termed the "gummy bear" implants, long before Sientra implants were FDA approved for use in the USA (March 9, 2012). However, Allergan did not received FDA approval for their stye 410 implants until AFTER sientra's FDA approval. So it IS confusing! I think the term should be abandoned, since it is so confusing.
All 3 breast implant companies in the USA make highly cohesive, high-strength cohesive, and cohesive silicone gel implants, each with a slightly different degree of cohesiveness, firmness (softness), rupture rate (fracture), and individual shapes (round and teardrop). None of these can "leak" so MRIs are a worthless test for this, IMHO.
Thus, "gummy bear" = cohesive. NOT Sientra. But Sientra (and Mentor, and Allergan) make cohesive implants often called "gummy bear" implants by the lay public. Some lay persons, AND some plastic surgeons, use the term "gummy bear" only for the highy cohesive style 410 made by Allergan, and some use the term "gummy bear" only for the high-strength cohesive Sientra implants. Some use it for both of these two options, but not for the remainder of cohesive silicone gel (smooth round) implants. AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!! Let's avoid this generic and confusing term and call implants what they really are. So much easier, and much more informative.
For more information that may be of assistance to you in selecting type of implant, smooth or textured, shaped or round, saline or silicone (all are now cohesive), please click on the web reference link below. Whew! that was a lot, but I hope it helped. Best wishes! Dr. Tholen
In 1990, Silimed began manufacturing textured mammary implants. In 1999, Silimed received 510K approval from the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the USA for its textured and smooth silicone elastomer implants. [this information from Silimed's own website history of the company]
On March 9, 2012, Silimed's Sientra silicone gel mammary implants received FDA approval for sale in the USA. Silimed is the first manufacturer outside the USA whose silicone mammary implants, smooth and textured, are approved in the USA. Furthermore, Silimed became the first manufacturer in the world whose form-stable (teardrop shaped) textured silicone gel implants were approved in the US market. (Allergan--formerly Inamed--SUBSEQUENTLY received FDA approval for its style 410 textured-surface shaped highly cohesive silicone gel implants, the popularly-named "gummy bear" implants).
But because Sientra's high-strength, cohesive, form-stable (teardrop-shaped), textured-surface implants were actually first to be FDA-approved in this country (and because they have used that terminology in their website information about their implants), many now call these "gummy bear" implants as well. The terminology is therefore confusing, like calling every facial tissue "Kleenex" when it might actually be a Puffs, or every copy machine a Xerox, when it could be a Minolta. But you know what I mean.
Each of the 3 USA breast implant manufacturers has shaped, textured-surface cohesive (or ultra-cohesive) implants, and each manufacturer has their own patented or "trade secret" way of creating the textured surface--the "proprietary" texturing method. McGhan (now Allergan) implants use a lost-salt technique where salt crystals create the high and low spots of the texture, designed to promote tissue adherence and ingrowth. The salt is then washed away before implant sterilization. This tissue adherence is not unlike Velcro, but is not the "hook and fabric loop" structure that Velcro uses.
This texture mimicked the structural properties of polyurethane-covered implants from 2 1/2 decades ago, where tissue ingrowth was shown to reduce (or prevent) capsular contracture (CC). CC was much more common at that time, since breast implants were usually placed ABOVE the muscle and just below the breast tissue, where there was significant bacterial contamination from the normal bacteria within the breast ducts. The texturing was also thought to "break up" the unidirectional collagen scar fibers that aligned themselves along a smooth-surface implant, contracted, and formed CC. And it worked! CC rates diminished.
Mentor developed their own textured-surface implants (Siltex), and their method of creating the surface texture was also proprietary (and different). It was a stamping process that created a much more finely-grained or almost "fuzzy" surface. My own experience with these implants showed that tissue ingrowth and adherence did not happen with this type or method of texturing, and years of experience with saline textured-surface implants showed a higher leak rate.
Sientra's method of texturing implants leads to a texture much more similar to the Allergan texture, but their technique is, again, proprietary, meaning they have their own way of creating what they feel is a better texture designed to promote adherence, ingrowth, CC reduction, and implant rotation avoidance (since an upside-down teardrop-shaped implant or sideways-positioned implant that was "stuck" there looks really wonky!
We know from other areas of bioengineering (such as rough-surface titanium hip or other orthopedic implants) that human tissues do not adhere equally to all man-made textured surfaces or materials. But we do know that textured breast implants DO reduce CC, particularly when used above the muscle. But since most plastic surgeons now place their breast implants BELOW the muscles, and have learned that even without texture this reduces CC significantly, the place for texture below the muscle is less for prevention of CC than for prevention of rotation to an abnormal position!
We also know from X-ray studies of women with smooth round breast implants and women with textured teardrop-shaped implants, the round implants are actually teardrop-shaped when the woman is standing, and indistinguishable from textured teardrop-shaped implants. They looked identical! But when reclining, the smooth round implants assumed a flatter round shape and dropped slightly to the side of the chest, just like naturally large(r) breasts do, whereas the teardrop-shaped implants did not move and poked straight up in an unnatural still-teardrop shape, making these so-called "anatomic" implants LESS anatomic than the smooth round ones.
Sientra's website uses the term "gummy bear" implants, and even though "gummy bear" is not medical terminology, Sientra's marketing people are clever, and have chosen to use this popular lay term in its promotional materials. But Allergan's stylee 410 implants were actually the first ones to be termed the "gummy bear" implants, long before Sientra implants were FDA approved for use in the USA (March 9, 2012). However, Allergan did not received FDA approval for their stye 410 implants until AFTER sientra's FDA approval. So it IS confusing! I think the term should be abandoned, since it is so confusing.
All 3 breast implant companies in the USA make highly cohesive, high-strength cohesive, and cohesive silicone gel implants, each with a slightly different degree of cohesiveness, firmness (softness), rupture rate (fracture), and individual shapes (round and teardrop). None of these can "leak" so MRIs are a worthless test for this, IMHO.
Thus, "gummy bear" = cohesive. NOT Sientra. But Sientra (and Mentor, and Allergan) make cohesive implants often called "gummy bear" implants by the lay public. Some lay persons, AND some plastic surgeons, use the term "gummy bear" only for the highy cohesive style 410 made by Allergan, and some use the term "gummy bear" only for the high-strength cohesive Sientra implants. Some use it for both of these two options, but not for the remainder of cohesive silicone gel (smooth round) implants. AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!! Let's avoid this generic and confusing term and call implants what they really are. So much easier, and much more informative.
For more information that may be of assistance to you in selecting type of implant, smooth or textured, shaped or round, saline or silicone (all are now cohesive), please click on the web reference link below. Whew! that was a lot, but I hope it helped. Best wishes! Dr. Tholen
Web reference: http://www.realself.com/article/dr-tholens-comprehensive-guide-breast-augmentation
Sientra breast implants are made by the Brazilian company Silimed, which
started in Rio de Janiero in 1978 to import French breast implants into
Brazil for growing plastic surgery use in that country. In 1981 Silimed
began to manufacture its products in Brazil, in a small
laboratory compatible with the technical requirements of the time. One
year later, it already exported to other countries in Latin America and,
in the following years, expanded to foreign markets, with products
geared towards various specialties.
Silimed began construction of a new factory in 1985, which started
to operate in early 1989. In 2000, a second factory was built,
starting its activities in 2003. After 35 years in the market, Silimed
operates with two factories in Brazil and exports to all five
continents.
In 1990, Silimed began manufacturing textured mammary implants. In 1999, Silimed received 510K approval from the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the USA for its textured and smooth silicone elastomer implants. [this information from Silimed's own website history of the company]
On March 9, 2012, Silimed's Sientra silicone gel mammary implants received FDA approval for sale in the USA. Silimed is the first manufacturer outside the USA whose silicone mammary implants, smooth and textured, are approved in the USA. Furthermore, Silimed became the first manufacturer in the world whose form-stable (teardrop shaped) textured silicone gel implants were approved in the US market. (Allergan--formerly Inamed--SUBSEQUENTLY received FDA approval for its style 410 textured-surface shaped highly cohesive silicone gel implants, the popularly-named "gummy bear" implants).
But because Sientra's high-strength, cohesive, form-stable (teardrop-shaped), textured-surface implants were actually first to be FDA-approved in this country (and because they have used that terminology in their website information about their implants), many now call these "gummy bear" implants as well. The terminology is therefore confusing, like calling every facial tissue "Kleenex" when it might actually be a Puffs, or every copy machine a Xerox, when it could be a Minolta. But you know what I mean.
Each of the 3 USA breast implant manufacturers has shaped, textured-surface cohesive (or ultra-cohesive) implants, and each manufacturer has their own patented or "trade secret" way of creating the textured surface--the "proprietary" texturing method. McGhan (now Allergan) implants use a lost-salt technique where salt crystals create the high and low spots of the texture, designed to promote tissue adherence and ingrowth. The salt is then washed away before implant sterilization. This tissue adherence is not unlike Velcro, but is not the "hook and fabric loop" structure that Velcro uses.
This texture mimicked the structural properties of polyurethane-covered implants from 2 1/2 decades ago, where tissue ingrowth was shown to reduce (or prevent) capsular contracture (CC). CC was much more common at that time, since breast implants were usually placed ABOVE the muscle and just below the breast tissue, where there was significant bacterial contamination from the normal bacteria within the breast ducts. The texturing was also thought to "break up" the unidirectional collagen scar fibers that aligned themselves along a smooth-surface implant, contracted, and formed CC. And it worked! CC rates diminished.
Mentor developed their own textured-surface implants (Siltex), and their method of creating the surface texture was also proprietary (and different). It was a stamping process that created a much more finely-grained or almost "fuzzy" surface. My own experience with these implants showed that tissue ingrowth and adherence did not happen with this type or method of texturing, and years of experience with saline textured-surface implants showed a higher leak rate.
Sientra's method of texturing implants leads to a texture much more similar to the Allergan texture, but their technique is, again, proprietary, meaning they have their own way of creating what they feel is a better texture designed to promote adherence, ingrowth, CC reduction, and implant rotation avoidance (since an upside-down teardrop-shaped implant or sideways-positioned implant that was "stuck" there looks really wonky!
We know from other areas of bioengineering (such as rough-surface titanium hip or other orthopedic implants) that human tissues do not adhere equally to all man-made textured surfaces or materials. But we do know that textured breast implants DO reduce CC, particularly when used above the muscle. But since most plastic surgeons now place their breast implants BELOW the muscles, and have learned that even without texture this reduces CC significantly, the place for texture below the muscle is less for prevention of CC than for prevention of rotation to an abnormal position!
We also know from X-ray studies of women with smooth round breast implants and women with textured teardrop-shaped implants, the round implants are actually teardrop-shaped when the woman is standing, and indistinguishable from textured teardrop-shaped implants. They looked identical! But when reclining, the smooth round implants assumed a flatter round shape and dropped slightly to the side of the chest, just like naturally large(r) breasts do, whereas the teardrop-shaped implants did not move and poked straight up in an unnatural still-teardrop shape, making these so-called "anatomic" implants LESS anatomic than the smooth round ones.
Sientra's website uses the term "gummy bear" implants, and even though "gummy bear" is not medical terminology, Sientra's marketing people are clever, and have chosen to use this popular lay term in its promotional materials. But Allergan's stylee 410 implants were actually the first ones to be termed the "gummy bear" implants, long before Sientra implants were FDA approved for use in the USA (March 9, 2012). However, Allergan did not received FDA approval for their stye 410 implants until AFTER sientra's FDA approval. So it IS confusing! I think the term should be abandoned, since it is so confusing.
All 3 breast implant companies in the USA make highly cohesive, high-strength cohesive, and cohesive silicone gel implants, each with a slightly different degree of cohesiveness, firmness (softness), rupture rate (fracture), and individual shapes (round and teardrop). None of these can "leak" so MRIs are a worthless test for this, IMHO.
Thus, "gummy bear" = cohesive. NOT Sientra. But Sientra (and Mentor, and Allergan) make cohesive implants often called "gummy bear" implants by the lay public. Some lay persons, AND some plastic surgeons, use the term "gummy bear" only for the highy cohesive style 410 made by Allergan, and some use the term "gummy bear" only for the high-strength cohesive Sientra implants. Some use it for both of these two options, but not for the remainder of cohesive silicone gel (smooth round) implants. AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!! Let's avoid this generic and confusing term and call implants what they really are. So much easier, and much more informative.
For more information that may be of assistance to you in selecting type of implant, smooth or textured, shaped or round, saline or silicone (all are now cohesive), please click on the web reference link below. Whew! that was a lot, but I hope it helped. Best wishes! Dr. Tholen
In 1990, Silimed began manufacturing textured mammary implants. In 1999, Silimed received 510K approval from the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the USA for its textured and smooth silicone elastomer implants. [this information from Silimed's own website history of the company]
On March 9, 2012, Silimed's Sientra silicone gel mammary implants received FDA approval for sale in the USA. Silimed is the first manufacturer outside the USA whose silicone mammary implants, smooth and textured, are approved in the USA. Furthermore, Silimed became the first manufacturer in the world whose form-stable (teardrop shaped) textured silicone gel implants were approved in the US market. (Allergan--formerly Inamed--SUBSEQUENTLY received FDA approval for its style 410 textured-surface shaped highly cohesive silicone gel implants, the popularly-named "gummy bear" implants).
But because Sientra's high-strength, cohesive, form-stable (teardrop-shaped), textured-surface implants were actually first to be FDA-approved in this country (and because they have used that terminology in their website information about their implants), many now call these "gummy bear" implants as well. The terminology is therefore confusing, like calling every facial tissue "Kleenex" when it might actually be a Puffs, or every copy machine a Xerox, when it could be a Minolta. But you know what I mean.
Each of the 3 USA breast implant manufacturers has shaped, textured-surface cohesive (or ultra-cohesive) implants, and each manufacturer has their own patented or "trade secret" way of creating the textured surface--the "proprietary" texturing method. McGhan (now Allergan) implants use a lost-salt technique where salt crystals create the high and low spots of the texture, designed to promote tissue adherence and ingrowth. The salt is then washed away before implant sterilization. This tissue adherence is not unlike Velcro, but is not the "hook and fabric loop" structure that Velcro uses.
This texture mimicked the structural properties of polyurethane-covered implants from 2 1/2 decades ago, where tissue ingrowth was shown to reduce (or prevent) capsular contracture (CC). CC was much more common at that time, since breast implants were usually placed ABOVE the muscle and just below the breast tissue, where there was significant bacterial contamination from the normal bacteria within the breast ducts. The texturing was also thought to "break up" the unidirectional collagen scar fibers that aligned themselves along a smooth-surface implant, contracted, and formed CC. And it worked! CC rates diminished.
Mentor developed their own textured-surface implants (Siltex), and their method of creating the surface texture was also proprietary (and different). It was a stamping process that created a much more finely-grained or almost "fuzzy" surface. My own experience with these implants showed that tissue ingrowth and adherence did not happen with this type or method of texturing, and years of experience with saline textured-surface implants showed a higher leak rate.
Sientra's method of texturing implants leads to a texture much more similar to the Allergan texture, but their technique is, again, proprietary, meaning they have their own way of creating what they feel is a better texture designed to promote adherence, ingrowth, CC reduction, and implant rotation avoidance (since an upside-down teardrop-shaped implant or sideways-positioned implant that was "stuck" there looks really wonky!
We know from other areas of bioengineering (such as rough-surface titanium hip or other orthopedic implants) that human tissues do not adhere equally to all man-made textured surfaces or materials. But we do know that textured breast implants DO reduce CC, particularly when used above the muscle. But since most plastic surgeons now place their breast implants BELOW the muscles, and have learned that even without texture this reduces CC significantly, the place for texture below the muscle is less for prevention of CC than for prevention of rotation to an abnormal position!
We also know from X-ray studies of women with smooth round breast implants and women with textured teardrop-shaped implants, the round implants are actually teardrop-shaped when the woman is standing, and indistinguishable from textured teardrop-shaped implants. They looked identical! But when reclining, the smooth round implants assumed a flatter round shape and dropped slightly to the side of the chest, just like naturally large(r) breasts do, whereas the teardrop-shaped implants did not move and poked straight up in an unnatural still-teardrop shape, making these so-called "anatomic" implants LESS anatomic than the smooth round ones.
Sientra's website uses the term "gummy bear" implants, and even though "gummy bear" is not medical terminology, Sientra's marketing people are clever, and have chosen to use this popular lay term in its promotional materials. But Allergan's stylee 410 implants were actually the first ones to be termed the "gummy bear" implants, long before Sientra implants were FDA approved for use in the USA (March 9, 2012). However, Allergan did not received FDA approval for their stye 410 implants until AFTER sientra's FDA approval. So it IS confusing! I think the term should be abandoned, since it is so confusing.
All 3 breast implant companies in the USA make highly cohesive, high-strength cohesive, and cohesive silicone gel implants, each with a slightly different degree of cohesiveness, firmness (softness), rupture rate (fracture), and individual shapes (round and teardrop). None of these can "leak" so MRIs are a worthless test for this, IMHO.
Thus, "gummy bear" = cohesive. NOT Sientra. But Sientra (and Mentor, and Allergan) make cohesive implants often called "gummy bear" implants by the lay public. Some lay persons, AND some plastic surgeons, use the term "gummy bear" only for the highy cohesive style 410 made by Allergan, and some use the term "gummy bear" only for the high-strength cohesive Sientra implants. Some use it for both of these two options, but not for the remainder of cohesive silicone gel (smooth round) implants. AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!! Let's avoid this generic and confusing term and call implants what they really are. So much easier, and much more informative.
For more information that may be of assistance to you in selecting type of implant, smooth or textured, shaped or round, saline or silicone (all are now cohesive), please click on the web reference link below. Whew! that was a lot, but I hope it helped. Best wishes! Dr. Tholen
Learn more: http://www.realself.com/article/dr-tholens-comprehensive-guide-breast-augmentation
The term “gummy bear” implant, which as far as I know was
initially coined by Dr. Grant Stevenson of Marina Del Rey, referred to the
Sientra textured round silicone implant. There is no true “gummy bear” implant
as this is just a nickname that was given because of the higher level of
cohesiveness of the gel. These days many surgeons refer to any type of silicone
implant as a “gummy bear” implant. With regards to cohesiveness and cross-linking, the silicone in 5th generation implants are either smooth round or
more form stable than Allergan and Mentor smooth round implants. All three
companies have significant form stability in their anatomical implants.
The term “gummy bear” implant, which as far as I know was
initially coined by Dr. Grant Stevenson of Marina Del Rey, referred to the
Sientra textured round silicone implant. There is no true “gummy bear” implant
as this is just a nickname that was given because of the higher level of
cohesiveness of the gel. These days many surgeons refer to any type of silicone
implant as a “gummy bear” implant. With regards to cohesiveness and cross-linking, the silicone in 5th generation implants are either smooth round or
more form stable than Allergan and Mentor smooth round implants. All three
companies have significant form stability in their anatomical implants.
"Gummy Bear Implants" is the popular name given to the latest generation of implants of Cohesive Silicon Gel.
SIENTRA or SILIMED implants for sure are Gummy Bear Implants", but they are not the only ones in the market.
But for me they are the best of all.
SIENTRA or SILIMED implants for sure are Gummy Bear Implants", but they are not the only ones in the market.
But for me they are the best of all.
"Gummy Bear Implants" is the popular name given to the latest generation of implants of Cohesive Silicon Gel.
SIENTRA or SILIMED implants for sure are Gummy Bear Implants", but they are not the only ones in the market.
But for me they are the best of all.
SIENTRA or SILIMED implants for sure are Gummy Bear Implants", but they are not the only ones in the market.
But for me they are the best of all.
You might also like...
*Treatment results may vary
Related content
All breast implants made today are cohesive but some are more cohesive than others. What this means is that the silicone gel is stuck together so it will not be runny or fluid like. Less cohesion means it is more like a thick gel and more cohesion means that the silicone is like a gummy bear candy; if you cut it in half and then squeeze it, the implant will deform but then return to its original shape when you let go. The gummy bear implants are safer, feel more natural and will hold a good shape for you.
I have added a video that shows this for you.
I have added a video that shows this for you.
Web reference: http://drwindle.com/breast-body-plastic-surgery/breast-implants-gummy-bear/
All breast implants made today are cohesive but some are more cohesive than others. What this means is that the silicone gel is stuck together so it will not be runny or fluid like. Less cohesion means it is more like a thick gel and more cohesion means that the silicone is like a gummy bear candy; if you cut it in half and then squeeze it, the implant will deform but then return to its original shape when you let go. The gummy bear implants are safer, feel more natural and will hold a good shape for you.
I have added a video that shows this for you.
I have added a video that shows this for you.
Learn more: http://drwindle.com/breast-body-plastic-surgery/breast-implants-gummy-bear/
Thank you for the question. All currently FDA approved silicone gel breast implants are “cohesive”. This “cohesiveness” makes it so that the silicone material is less likely to leak, if/when there is a failure of the surrounding shell.
The “gummy bear” silicone material is a more dense material chemically. The term “gummy bear” has been used, almost as a slang term, to encompass all silicone gel breast implants; thus the confusion. None of the types of breast implants you mention are necessarily “better”; there are pros/cons associated with each type of implant.
Every patient who presents for breast augmentation surgery has a different body type, different goals/concerns, and potentially a different “mindset” when it comes to the best breast implant for her. It is, therefore very important to individualize each patient's care.
Web reference: http://www.poustiplasticsurgery.com/Procedures/Procedure_breastAugmentation.htm
Thank you for the question. All currently FDA approved silicone gel breast implants are “cohesive”. This “cohesiveness” makes it so that the silicone material is less likely to leak, if/when there is a failure of the surrounding shell.
The “gummy bear” silicone material is a more dense material chemically. The term “gummy bear” has been used, almost as a slang term, to encompass all silicone gel breast implants; thus the confusion. None of the types of breast implants you mention are necessarily “better”; there are pros/cons associated with each type of implant.
Every patient who presents for breast augmentation surgery has a different body type, different goals/concerns, and potentially a different “mindset” when it comes to the best breast implant for her. It is, therefore very important to individualize each patient's care.
Learn more: http://www.poustiplasticsurgery.com/Procedures/Procedure_breastAugmentation.htm
"Gummy Bear" is a descriptive nickname for the newest, most advanced silicone gel breast implant. In my experience - over 15 years in active practice - Gummy Bear implants deliver outstanding results. I have placed over 500. As you may know, the so-called Gummy Bears are fairly recently FDA approved. I was part of an FDA Gummy Bear trail for nearly a decade. Thus, I am very familiar with this implant and have no pause recommending Gummy Bears. And, I have hundreds of patients who would agree. As to Sientra, they make an superior product. Good luck to you as your research continues. You're asking good questions and honing in on an excellent choice.
Web reference: http://www.stillwaterplasticsurgery.com/about-us/meet-dr-capizzi/gummy-bear-expertise/
"Gummy Bear" is a descriptive nickname for the newest, most advanced silicone gel breast implant. In my experience - over 15 years in active practice - Gummy Bear implants deliver outstanding results. I have placed over 500. As you may know, the so-called Gummy Bears are fairly recently FDA approved. I was part of an FDA Gummy Bear trail for nearly a decade. Thus, I am very familiar with this implant and have no pause recommending Gummy Bears. And, I have hundreds of patients who would agree. As to Sientra, they make an superior product. Good luck to you as your research continues. You're asking good questions and honing in on an excellent choice.
Learn more: http://www.stillwaterplasticsurgery.com/about-us/meet-dr-capizzi/gummy-bear-expertise/
The term "gummy bear" was first mentioned by Dr. Grant Stevens, I believe. It's just an easy-to-understand term about the feel of the new generation of very "cohesive" implants.
Cohesive implants, with a thicker silicone fill, are made by all 3 FDA approved companies. They can be teardrop or round shaped. They do feel a little firmer than standard silicone implants.
If you are in the Orlando area, come in for a consultation - and I can show you the different types of implants available, including the Sientra implant.
All the best,
Cohesive implants, with a thicker silicone fill, are made by all 3 FDA approved companies. They can be teardrop or round shaped. They do feel a little firmer than standard silicone implants.
If you are in the Orlando area, come in for a consultation - and I can show you the different types of implants available, including the Sientra implant.
All the best,
Web reference: http://www.plasticsurgeryinflorida.com/breasts/breast-augmentation.html
The term "gummy bear" was first mentioned by Dr. Grant Stevens, I believe. It's just an easy-to-understand term about the feel of the new generation of very "cohesive" implants.
Cohesive implants, with a thicker silicone fill, are made by all 3 FDA approved companies. They can be teardrop or round shaped. They do feel a little firmer than standard silicone implants.
If you are in the Orlando area, come in for a consultation - and I can show you the different types of implants available, including the Sientra implant.
All the best,
Cohesive implants, with a thicker silicone fill, are made by all 3 FDA approved companies. They can be teardrop or round shaped. They do feel a little firmer than standard silicone implants.
If you are in the Orlando area, come in for a consultation - and I can show you the different types of implants available, including the Sientra implant.
All the best,
Learn more: http://www.plasticsurgeryinflorida.com/breasts/breast-augmentation.html
Thank you for your question.
Gummy Bear is a nickname given to breast implants that are textured form-stable, and anatomically-shaped.
Sientra is the specific name of a company that makes breast implants only available to board certified plastic surgeons.
All three major breast implant companies in the United States -- Sientra, Allergan and Mentor -- make anatomically-shaped, form stable, textured breast implants.
Sientra was the first company to have its full portfolio of implants FDA cleared in the U.S.
I hope this helps.
Gummy Bear is a nickname given to breast implants that are textured form-stable, and anatomically-shaped.
Sientra is the specific name of a company that makes breast implants only available to board certified plastic surgeons.
All three major breast implant companies in the United States -- Sientra, Allergan and Mentor -- make anatomically-shaped, form stable, textured breast implants.
Sientra was the first company to have its full portfolio of implants FDA cleared in the U.S.
I hope this helps.
Web reference: http://www.drjjwendel.com/breast-implants
Thank you for your question.
Gummy Bear is a nickname given to breast implants that are textured form-stable, and anatomically-shaped.
Sientra is the specific name of a company that makes breast implants only available to board certified plastic surgeons.
All three major breast implant companies in the United States -- Sientra, Allergan and Mentor -- make anatomically-shaped, form stable, textured breast implants.
Sientra was the first company to have its full portfolio of implants FDA cleared in the U.S.
I hope this helps.
Gummy Bear is a nickname given to breast implants that are textured form-stable, and anatomically-shaped.
Sientra is the specific name of a company that makes breast implants only available to board certified plastic surgeons.
All three major breast implant companies in the United States -- Sientra, Allergan and Mentor -- make anatomically-shaped, form stable, textured breast implants.
Sientra was the first company to have its full portfolio of implants FDA cleared in the U.S.
I hope this helps.
Learn more: http://www.drjjwendel.com/breast-implants
"Gummy bear" implants is a lay term to describe implants that hold their shape. This means the implant can have a gentle slope to be more like a natural breast. Also, the implant can be taller than it is wide or wider than it is tall. Other terms for these implants are highly cohesive or anatomical shaped implants. All three manufacturers of breast implants in the U.S. (Silimed, Allergan, and Mentor) have a line of shaped implants that are FDA approved. Each implant has slightly different characteristics and some surgeons prefer one implant to another.
Sientra has a line of round gel implants with both smooth and textured surface. Visit a board certified plastic surgeon to learn more about Sientra breast implants.
Trey Aquadro, M.D.
East Alabama Plastic Surgery
Auburn, AL
Sientra has a line of round gel implants with both smooth and textured surface. Visit a board certified plastic surgeon to learn more about Sientra breast implants.
Trey Aquadro, M.D.
East Alabama Plastic Surgery
Auburn, AL
"Gummy bear" implants is a lay term to describe implants that hold their shape. This means the implant can have a gentle slope to be more like a natural breast. Also, the implant can be taller than it is wide or wider than it is tall. Other terms for these implants are highly cohesive or anatomical shaped implants. All three manufacturers of breast implants in the U.S. (Silimed, Allergan, and Mentor) have a line of shaped implants that are FDA approved. Each implant has slightly different characteristics and some surgeons prefer one implant to another.
Sientra has a line of round gel implants with both smooth and textured surface. Visit a board certified plastic surgeon to learn more about Sientra breast implants.
Trey Aquadro, M.D.
East Alabama Plastic Surgery
Auburn, AL
Sientra has a line of round gel implants with both smooth and textured surface. Visit a board certified plastic surgeon to learn more about Sientra breast implants.
Trey Aquadro, M.D.
East Alabama Plastic Surgery
Auburn, AL
The term "gummy bear" implant is a lay term for silicone implants which are highly cohesive - i.e. eve if the shell of the implant is punctured or cut the silicone inside will not tend to leak out. All three major manufacturers of silicone implants in the USA - Silamed (Sientra), Allergan (Natrelle), and Mentor (Memory Shape) - produce this
type of implant. At present the implant which has the highest degree of cohesiveness is the Allergan 410 implant which is also referred to as a form stable implant. Best wishes, Dr Lepore.
type of implant. At present the implant which has the highest degree of cohesiveness is the Allergan 410 implant which is also referred to as a form stable implant. Best wishes, Dr Lepore.
Web reference: http://www.vincentleporemd.com
The term "gummy bear" implant is a lay term for silicone implants which are highly cohesive - i.e. eve if the shell of the implant is punctured or cut the silicone inside will not tend to leak out. All three major manufacturers of silicone implants in the USA - Silamed (Sientra), Allergan (Natrelle), and Mentor (Memory Shape) - produce this
type of implant. At present the implant which has the highest degree of cohesiveness is the Allergan 410 implant which is also referred to as a form stable implant. Best wishes, Dr Lepore.
type of implant. At present the implant which has the highest degree of cohesiveness is the Allergan 410 implant which is also referred to as a form stable implant. Best wishes, Dr Lepore.
Learn more: http://www.vincentleporemd.com
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.
You might also like...
Related Content
Mentor Memory Gel Silicone Implants Vs Sientra HIGHLY Cohesive...
16 doctor answers
How long can it take for Sientra textured cohesive gel implants to...
10 doctor answers
Do textured implants settle the same way as smooth ones?
10 doctor answers
I have Sientra Breast Implants 350cc, went from 34a to 34d. Am I...
10 doctor answers
Ask a Doctor
Get personalized answers from board-certified doctors. For free.
Sientra Breast Implants Pictures
*Treatment results may vary
Sientra Breast Implants Pictures
*Treatment results may vary
