I had prophylactic, skin/nipple sparing double mastectomy with sailin implants in 2006. Complications and infections followed. right implant removed for 1 year. 2008 had DIEP flap with good results. lost 50 pounds and unhappy with the look of upper pole of breasts. Chest is flat down to the fuller flap portion of breasts. Is it a reasonable expectation to have an implant put in to fill the upper pole of the breast? Would it be best placed under muscle or over? I had fat grafting 85%is gone.
Answer: Flat upper pole in diep flap reconstructed breast after significant weight loss That question is an interesting one, but perhaps the answer is not as complicated as it might seem. Given the information your provided the following might be a suitable approach. If you have more flap skin than is needed, you could have some of that removed in the upper portion and then re-advance a fat only portion of the flap under the superior mastectomy flap to augment the upper pole. Additionally, a second attempt at fat grafting might be in order after the above described procedure (into the new tissue re-positioned there. A loss of 85% is very high. With a change in technique you might be able to achieve higher take rates. If these two maneuvers don't provide the needed volume, then an implant would be warranted. Those maneuvers will not have been done in vain as they will provide more natural coverage over an implant.
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW Answer: Flat upper pole in diep flap reconstructed breast after significant weight loss That question is an interesting one, but perhaps the answer is not as complicated as it might seem. Given the information your provided the following might be a suitable approach. If you have more flap skin than is needed, you could have some of that removed in the upper portion and then re-advance a fat only portion of the flap under the superior mastectomy flap to augment the upper pole. Additionally, a second attempt at fat grafting might be in order after the above described procedure (into the new tissue re-positioned there. A loss of 85% is very high. With a change in technique you might be able to achieve higher take rates. If these two maneuvers don't provide the needed volume, then an implant would be warranted. Those maneuvers will not have been done in vain as they will provide more natural coverage over an implant.
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW February 25, 2014
Answer: Yes breast implants can be used to fill out you upper pole. You have a very complicated issue. Yes you can have implants. I would recommend that you go to your original surgeon or another very experienced DIEP flap surgeon. Did you have surgical weight loss so that this happened very quickly?Three basic forms of breast reconstruction exist. You can use your own tissue, implants or a
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW February 25, 2014
Answer: Yes breast implants can be used to fill out you upper pole. You have a very complicated issue. Yes you can have implants. I would recommend that you go to your original surgeon or another very experienced DIEP flap surgeon. Did you have surgical weight loss so that this happened very quickly?Three basic forms of breast reconstruction exist. You can use your own tissue, implants or a
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW
May 8, 2017
Answer: Implants for DIEP flap augmentation Yes, placement of implants under a DIEP flap reconstruction is a common method of "augmenting" the volume of your breast reconstruction. In your case, the DIEP flap lost volume with weight loss and fat injections alone may not be enough to give you the desired fullness. Therefore, implant placement can increase the volume and projection of the reconstructed breast to achieve a more pleasing shape.
Helpful
May 8, 2017
Answer: Implants for DIEP flap augmentation Yes, placement of implants under a DIEP flap reconstruction is a common method of "augmenting" the volume of your breast reconstruction. In your case, the DIEP flap lost volume with weight loss and fat injections alone may not be enough to give you the desired fullness. Therefore, implant placement can increase the volume and projection of the reconstructed breast to achieve a more pleasing shape.
Helpful
FIND THE RIGHT
TREATMENT FOR YOU
July 24, 2014
Answer: Breast Implants can be placed after DIEP Flaps for better contour and upper pole fullness Absolutely, breast implants can be placed under the DIEP free flaps to add improved breast shape and fill the upper pole. This is usually placed below the flap and above the pec muscle. I would suggest a round implant with a smaller diameter. The reason for this small diameter is so that the implant does not compromise the pedicle (blood vessels) of the DIEP flap. Even after 4 years your flap may still be reliant on the blood vessels to the flap. Contoured or anatomic implants will likely rotate in this sub-flap pocket as it is not a strongly adherent region. Also would suggest revisiting the idea of fat grafting the upper pole as it is generally a successful operation.
Helpful
July 24, 2014
Answer: Breast Implants can be placed after DIEP Flaps for better contour and upper pole fullness Absolutely, breast implants can be placed under the DIEP free flaps to add improved breast shape and fill the upper pole. This is usually placed below the flap and above the pec muscle. I would suggest a round implant with a smaller diameter. The reason for this small diameter is so that the implant does not compromise the pedicle (blood vessels) of the DIEP flap. Even after 4 years your flap may still be reliant on the blood vessels to the flap. Contoured or anatomic implants will likely rotate in this sub-flap pocket as it is not a strongly adherent region. Also would suggest revisiting the idea of fat grafting the upper pole as it is generally a successful operation.
Helpful
