Maybe. The problem is that MOST no-plastic surgeons commonly equate "natural" with attractive and healthy when, in fact, natural often means found in nature or copying nature. ( As such, droopy breasts, wrinkled faces are truly "natural"). Along those lines, allow me to express my sincerest skepticism as regards the veracity of the unaided "naturalness" of the "Angelina Jolie-type breast shape" in most women, including the actress, and I would like you to imagine just how attractive her present breasts will be in 20 years or less, when they inevitably lose their eternal battle with gravity and head south. (I believe the descriptive word is avalanche,,) Seriously. For cosmetic surgery to work well, plastic surgeons have to recognize obstacles and pitfalls as well as each patient's particular terrain requirements and navigate them based on BOTH common sense and surgical experience. YOUR current breast skin envelope may allow your surgeon to place an 800 cc implant in you - but that does not mean that he/she should do so. Your present breast tissue (inside the skin envelope) will dictate how much COVER it can provide an implant (to make its ripples less obvious). As such if you had a huge breast skin envelope and only a small amount of breast tissue you would require a breast lift to remove extra skin and either have a smaller implant, an implant that ripples less (gel) OR extra cover to an implant such as can be provided with loose tissue on the sides of the breasts used as a filler flap or even a back muscle flap on top of a larger (now covered) implant. There is a world of possibilities out there. Each one of which has its draw backs. When you understand them, THE choice will become much clearer. But - if I can leave you with one simple thought to keep repeating to yourself - Bigger is NOT always better and 500 cc is NOT small. I hope this was helpful.