My breast augmentation for appearance only was back in the 1980's. They were silicone back then. What possible health hazards am I faced with? They still look great even though one is firmer than the other. Should I replace them, because frankly I cant afford it, but I will if they are dangerous. From what Ive read there are really no real health issues to worry about. I would like to get an MRI to better check my breasts once a year for a mammogram becsause they are dense when x-rayed.
Silicone implants from the 1980's?
Doctor Answers (8)
Silicone implants from the 1980's
If there is no reason to remove the implants, I wouldn't recommend doing so. In my community the MRI can set you back about $2000, so you may want to think twice, since your insurer is not likely to cover the expense. The health hazards are minimal, verified in numerous studies done before the gel implants were allowed back on the market.
The firmness is a sign of capsular contracture, not of rupture itself, though rupture can be a cause. Best bet would be a consultation with a plastic surgeon. Also acceptable is a discussion with your primary physician.
Thanks for your question, best wishes.
Old silicone gel implants
do not need to be replaced if you are happy with how things are for you. If you look with an MRI and your implant is ruptured, the recommendation will be for replacement. So don't look unless you want to consider replacing them. The capsule that formed around your original implant will contain any silicone unless you are involved in some high impact trauma to your chest.
Silicone gel implants
The breast that has become firmer is more likely to have a ruptured implant. The best test is an M.R.I. If there is a rupture the implants need to be removed, and If you wish replaced. If there is no rupture then leave well enough alone.
You might also like...
Silicone Implants Safe
Silicon implants from the 1980s, should they be removed?
Silicone leak (except from the recently recalled PIP implants) is not dangerous; silicone is used in joint replacements and other medical devices.
Breast implants from the 1980s had thinner shells and much more liquid silicone than is used today.
The silicone used in implants now is much firmer; if you cut through the centre of an implant today, it looks like cutting through a "jelly baby").
If the silicone leak is contained within the scar tissue that forms around the breast implant (capsule) it just remains adjacent to the original implant. If the silicone leak migrates past this (less commonly), it can end up in lymph glands in the armpit or in the surrounding tissues such as muscle. In these cases, it can cause cause symptoms (such as swelling in the armpit glands) and discomfort as well as a poor appearance. Whilst this is not dangerous, it may be uncomfortable.
All implants I have removed from the 1980s have some degree of leak, usually it is contained, sometimes it is in the surrounding tissues (making surgical removal more challenging).
Once again to emphasise it is not dangerous, however, many people do not like the appearance of their implant. 1980s implants had a much higher rate of capsular contracture (scar tissue around the implant causing it to feel firm and look distorted) than the implants we use today.
I would say implants, even today with more durable shells and firmer silicone, are not a lifetime device. Exchange, however, is usually more for cosmetic appearance rather than safety.
If your implants look great, and don't bother you, I would leave them. I suspect if you do get an MRI, there will almost definitely be some type of leak from such an old implant, however, it is not unsafe to leave them alone.
Silicone implants from the 1980's
I think you already answered your own question. You do not want to change them. If the firmness bothers you then you probably have a significant capsular contracture which would warrant removal and exchange.
Long term effects of breast implants
Extensive research has shown all over the world that there is no hidden risk from silicone breast implants, even when they have stayed in the body for many years.
The difference between the breasts is likely to be because of difference in the degree of capsule formation around the breats and most women with implants will have some degree of difference.
The newer implants are stronger and better designed. But frankly, if you are happy with the current appearance, there is no need to change them.
An MRI is useful to know whether there is any hidden (intracapsular, i.e. within the capsule) rupture of the implants. An ordinary mammogram is usually adequate to pick up any changes as long as the radigrapher knows that you have implants and they use special views.