POSTED UNDER Breast Implants REVIEWS
27 Years Old; Mom of 2; 5'7" and 135 Lbs - Layton, UT
ORIGINAL POST
Well, I never thought I'd be writing about boobs. ...
NewBoobiesFTWDecember 2, 2015
WORTH IT$6,700
Well, I never thought I'd be writing about boobs. . . let alone MY boobs. But here we are.
After having two kids (but only breastfeeding 1 long-term), my poor boobs are saggy and shrunken. I used to be a 34 D and although I haven't been "formally" resized, I'll bet I'm somewhere around a B.
After having an amazing consult with Dr. York Yates, I'm debating between a 440 cc anatomical HP (under the muscle) and a 480 cc round silicone UHP (under the muscle). I'm leaning toward the anatomical 440's, but I'm a little concerned about them not being big enough.
That being said, I don't want to look like I have deployed airbags under my shirt. But if I'm going to spend nearly $7,000 on boobies, I want to be able to tell a difference, by golly.
My main concern with the round 480's is upper pole. I don't want them to be so round that I have beach ball boobs. Does that make sense? Surprisingly, there is slightly less projection associated with the round {vs anatomical}, so I'm not worried about that.
I've uploaded some computer-generated comparisons between the round and anatomical, but I'm not sure I trust the images 100%. It's just so hard to know what it will actually look like in real life.
Decisions, decisions.
After having two kids (but only breastfeeding 1 long-term), my poor boobs are saggy and shrunken. I used to be a 34 D and although I haven't been "formally" resized, I'll bet I'm somewhere around a B.
After having an amazing consult with Dr. York Yates, I'm debating between a 440 cc anatomical HP (under the muscle) and a 480 cc round silicone UHP (under the muscle). I'm leaning toward the anatomical 440's, but I'm a little concerned about them not being big enough.
That being said, I don't want to look like I have deployed airbags under my shirt. But if I'm going to spend nearly $7,000 on boobies, I want to be able to tell a difference, by golly.
My main concern with the round 480's is upper pole. I don't want them to be so round that I have beach ball boobs. Does that make sense? Surprisingly, there is slightly less projection associated with the round {vs anatomical}, so I'm not worried about that.
I've uploaded some computer-generated comparisons between the round and anatomical, but I'm not sure I trust the images 100%. It's just so hard to know what it will actually look like in real life.
Decisions, decisions.
NewBoobiesFTW's provider
UPDATED FROM NewBoobiesFTW
18 days pre
Dream Boobs
NewBoobiesFTWDecember 2, 2015
Here's my dream board. . . I didn't have this complete when I went in for my consultation, so I'm hoping that I'll be able to show my Dr. these pictures at my pre-op and he'll say, "Why, yes. Your 440 cc anatomical hp unders will look just like these!" And I'll do a little happy jig in his office.
A girl can dream.
Replies (0)
UPDATED FROM NewBoobiesFTW
18 days pre
Round 2
NewBoobiesFTWDecember 3, 2015
For reasons unknown, it's quite impossible to edit previous posts (which I'm sure you all have realized). Silly, silly, silly.
So let's try this again. Dream boobs.
{Sorry the pics are all kinda goofy-- I had to chop up my collage because it wouldn't let me upload it in its entirety.}
So let's try this again. Dream boobs.
{Sorry the pics are all kinda goofy-- I had to chop up my collage because it wouldn't let me upload it in its entirety.}
It sounds like you have a goal look which is helpful. Feel free to share any wish boob pictures you might have. Feel free to join the December 2015 breast augmentation surgery forum for some pre and post op support. Good luck and hoping you'll update us often!