Treatment Provider
- Our highly-trained Review Moderation team evaluates all reviews before they're published to ensure they're written by people like you and not a member of a doctor's office.
- This multi-step process takes up to 24 hours from review submission to publication.
- Doctors can't pay to have reviews removed or hidden.
- Reviews are only removed at the reviewer's request or if they violate our Terms of Service.
If you have questions or believe we should re-evaluate a published review, let us know.
3 months post downsize
Pros- Most people can’t tell. I LOVE not having a scar. Very soft and squishy when I’m relaxed.
Cons- They animate when I flex my chest, and I have a little more upper pole volume than I’d like. (Not teardrop shaped from the side)
I’m very happy now. I’ll probably switch to a fat transfer in the future, but I think these are as perfect and natural appearing as an implant can be.

24 Apr 2025
Thank you for your extensive report and pictures ! I am sure patients appreciate it a lot! On the other hand, I noticed your comment on "animation" . I have news for you: the past 6 months. We have Motiva implants available which are doing great in a subglandular position So I have been switching some patients from submuscular to subglandular with great results. Also performing now primary augmentation in subglandular position sometimes even under local anesthesia
my implants fluffed / grew !
Mini Boob Job - 255cc then Downsized to 170cc
I chose to downsize to 170cc based on the fact that by BWD was 12cm- so the 170s (low profile by natrelle, 11cm wide 2.2 projection) were the smallest implants that would fit my chest. Honestly, I was scared going down to 170cc from 255 wouldn't be a big enough difference, since its only 33% down and I felt HUGE. Now that I have 170cc they're maybe slightly too small. I think the width is perfect and that I could've used a TAD more projection. But these are way, way more beautiful than the 255s, and I feel gorgeous and sexy.
I'm excited to be a C cup now. My breasts are so much softer and jiggly with the tiny implants, and they're honestly completely undetectable. Beyond just being small, I got the responsive gel (softest ones), so there isn't a lot of upper pole fullness either. I'm a very critical person, and when I look at my own body I can't find any trace of implant, so I know no one else can either. I didn't think it was possible for implants to look and feel this real. I'm more confident having boobs that are slightly on the small side than being potentially insecure about having "Fake" breasts.
Dr. Turowksi's surgical work is excellent. Even though I didn't like my 255cc implants, they were wonderfully done. My incisions are beautifully camouflaged and my revision surgery was quick and nearly painless. I wish I had gotten a little more insight on sizing and what different implants might look like, but he was honest that he didn't have a lot of experience with small volume implants. I really appreciated that he didn't dismiss my concerns about feeling too big, and discounted his rate for me to swap them out because he wanted me to be happy. I think a lot of surgeons would've told me I was being silly since 255cc are "objectively" not huge, but he took my feelings seriously.
I only say "not sure" if its worth it because I wish I'd gotten it right the first time. Once you add in a revision, additional risks, healing, and costs for an overall subtle change, it's a tough call. However, I look and feel beautiful. I don't think I'm ever going to critique my boobs again! I'd recommend Dr. Turowksi as well. He knows what he's doing. Just make sure you know what you want :-)
Provider Review

24 Apr 2025
Thank you for your extensive report and pictures ! I am sure patients appreciate it a lot! On the other hand, I noticed your comment on "animation" . I have news for you: the past 6 months. We have Motiva implants available which are doing great in a subglandular position So I have been switching some patients from submuscular to subglandular with great results. Also performing now primary augmentation in subglandular position sometimes even under local anesthesia