CoolSculpting Vs Laser Lipolysis

I have heard about zeltiq (CoolSculpting) alot but i wonder how is the end result compare to any laser lipolysis? dont tell me one is invasive n noninvasive, someone told me cryolipolysis result is almost same with laser lipolysis, is it true?

Doctor Answers 41

Coolsculpting Vs Liposonix (laser Lipolysis)

Both treatments are noninvasive, although Lipolysis is reportedly much ore painful. I think the mistake a lot of patients are making is assuming that both of these treatments have the same benefits regardless of the area being treated and the amount of fat in that area.   It is important to recognize that Coolsculpting is great for treating larger fat deposits.  If you can grab a handful of fat, you generally will benefit much more from Coolsculpting. If you can only pinch an inch, and the skin is tight and can't be sucked into the Coolsculpting applicator, you might be better off doing Lipolysis.

Coolsculpting can be done on the abdomen, love handles, and back.  Lipolysis is normally done on the abdomen and love handles.

Price point is comparable.  Results may be seen sooner in Coolsculpting, in 4-6 weeks where as Lipolysis takes 3-6 months.

 


Miami Dermatologic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 2 reviews

Zeltiq is much different from laser lipolysis

Think of laser lipolysis (which is rarely done as a stand alone procedure, it is almost always a combination of regular liposuction plus laser lipolysis) as a way of popping fat cells with a tiny hot poker (!).  The fat cells release an oily substance that is sucked out with standard liposuction instruments.  There are definitely incisions and not uncommonly there is pain and bruising. Numbing injections are used during the procedure to dull the pain. The results are very good.

 Now think of Zeltiq as freezing the fat cells, literally a giant suction cup sucks the skin along with the underlying fat.  The "sucked in" area is then chilled for an hour.  The fat cells don't pop, they undergo a slow death and are processed like any cell that dies in the body. The elimination of the damaged cells takes a few months. There is no pain or anesthesia, no incision and usually no bruising.  The recovery is a bit of soreness, possibly some short term numbness.

Cost wise the Zeltiq is less expense and the downtime is zero.  The results are moderate.  If you want a dramatic result go with the old fashioned liposuction (with or without laser lipolysis).  If you want easy, less expensive and more moderate results Zeltiq is indeed a good choice.

Susan Van Dyke, MD
Paradise Valley Dermatologic Surgeon
4.5 out of 5 stars 25 reviews

Laser Liposuction VS Zeltiq = FIRE VS ICE

In the ever increasing battle to separate people from their hard earned money by separating them from SOME of their fat newer methods are sprouting to do away with fat.

LASER LIPOSUCTION differs from other tumescent liposuction methods in  how the fat is treated BEFORE it is removed by suction. The fat is COOKED / BURNED with a very hot laser fiber. The heat not only destroys fat but also affects blood vessels, lymphatics and nerves (more permanent numbness) and the overlying skin. The problem is just how to stop short of causing permanent skin injury and how to gage fat injury since the fat will continue to change with time resulting in depressions that may not be seen at the time of the procedure.

ZELTIQ - is a procedure in which you have a portion of the area you want treated PINCHED and frozen for about 45 minutes at a time. The ice that forms in the fat cells destroys the cells and the body then gradually evacuates the destroyed fat cell contents. It needs to be done in multiple rather expensive sessions and is an option for those who are adamant about not having surgery but who are willing to have 4-5 sessions and a slightly less predictable and customized result.

Personally, I do not think either one of these techniques comes close to matching the capabilities of VASER, PAL or regular liposuction.

Peter A. Aldea, MD
Memphis Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 91 reviews

Laser Lipolysis vs Zeltiq- cool sculpting

The fact that one (Laser Liposuction) is invasive is important as it increases the risk of infection,requires anesthesia, and has side effects not found with Zeltiq cool sculpting including burns. However to achieve the results found with Laser Lipolysis may require multiple treatments.

Joshua L. Fox, MD
Long Island Dermatologic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 17 reviews

SculpSure from Cynosure is now available

This seems to be a better technique for non-invasive contouring. In my office, I can address 4 applicators to 2 or 3 areas in 20 minutes each. This means a lunch hour etc. This machine-SculpSure-will totally change the time parameter. Also, warm sculpting has a feathering of the edges. I have had this done with four areas twice in 40 minutes and fell asleep during second one! Bring music!

Laser lipo vs Coolsculpt

Think of Laser Lipolysis as laser assisted liposcuction. Incisions are made and the laser device is inserted into the fat pocket and used to burst the cells and make the liposuction process easier for the physician. The procedure requires injections of tumescent lidocaine and sometimes the procedure is done under general anesthesia.  The recovery is the same as liposuction in which you must wear compression garments and there is typically significant pain requiring pain meds and limited exercise.
Coolsculpt uses a vacuum to suck your skin and fat into a hand-piece with cooling plates. The fat is cooled over an hour period in which the fat freezes and this causes the fat cells to die. Your body then disposes of the dead fat cells and you achieve a reduction in the area treated.You can start to see results in about 3 weeks and the results continue for 3 months.  The process is performed without anesthetic injections and no general anesthesia. There is some discomfort when the vacuum is applied; a tugging/pulling sensation. That subsides as the skin temp lowers.  At the end of the treatment period there is 2 minutes of massage which some people find uncomfortable but not really painful. There are no restrictions on activities; you are able to go to the gym and keep up with your routine. Depending on the area treated, many people workout the next day; some people take a couple days off from their workouts.  Working out is not necessary for results; It is important that you do not gain weight but you do not need to loose weight to see the changes. This is a great treatment that actually works and can give you lipo-like results.

Coolsculpting vs Laser Lipolysis

Our practice offers both technologies so the results really depend upon your desires. If you prefer a result with no downtime that is non-invasive, the cool sculpting is a better alternative. This technology is FDA approved and results in a reduction of fat by 20-25% in the areas treated. Laser lipolysis is a surgical procedure that is minimally invasive and performed under local anesthesia. The results are a reduction in fat from 70-80%. See a board certified plastic surgeon for a consultation and treatment plan.

Richard Chaffoo, MD, FACS
San Diego Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 10 reviews

Laser Lypolysis and Zeltiq are both effective

CoolSculpting by Zeltiq is a non-surgical, FDA approved device for permanent fat reduction by using cryolypolysis to freeze localized areas of fat.  This mechanism works by damaging the fat cells  walls in the treatment area which are later removed through the body's  own metabolic process.  Unlike laser lipolysis, where a laser fiber is utilized surgically to damage fat cells by either heat or through photo- acoustic damage to cell wall. The damaged fat cells after laser lipolysis need to be removed by liposuction through a small cannula. If the majority of these fat cells are not removed, then the body's natural process will be unable to handle the large volume of ruptured cells.  They must be removed surgically through liposuction

 In terms of results, CoolSculpting is best for patients with small areas of localized fat, and those who are within 10 to 20 pounds of their ideal body weight.  One treatment of CoolSculpting will remove about 25% of fat in the treatment area and can be repeated 3-4 months later if desired.  Whereas laser liposuction, when done properly, can remove 85-95% of the fat cells in the treatment area in one procedure.

Results from  laser Liposuction is heavily dependent upon the experience of the plastic surgeon as well as the type of laser that is being used.  I have had good results using SmartLipo Triplex for patients who are good candidates. However, for those patients who have smaller areas to treat and do not want a surgical procedure, CoolSculpting by Zeltiq has been an excellent alternative with high level of patient satisfaction.  

Steven L. Ringler, MD, FACS
Grand Rapids Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 53 reviews

Zeltig versus laser lipolysis

Coolsculpting by Zeltig is cryolipolysis and hence does not use a laser to destroy tissue. Thus, the permanent fat reduction that is seen with coolscultping is achieved in a safer manner since no peripheral destruction occurs as would potentially with a laser. The results with coolsculpting are real and reproducible and less variable amongst practitioners. On average a 20% reduction may be seen in fat with one simple safe treatment.

Steven Hacker, MD
West Palm Beach Dermatologic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 4 reviews

Coolsculpting Vs Liposonix (laser Lipolysis)

CoolSculpting is a proven technique with proven results. Laser lipolysis is much newer and does not yet have the track record of reliable, predictable results. It may be great but I would let other people be the guinea pigs. Good luck. 

Robert Graper, MD
Charlotte Plastic Surgeon
4.5 out of 5 stars 22 reviews

These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.