I've seen it suggested sometimes that FUT is perhaps the safer option to go with first time as it maximizes graft survival and still leaves open the option of using FUE for future transplants. But is it similarly possible to go the FUE route first time around and then consider FUT years later? In the case of someone who might look to combine the two methods over time so as to maximize overall yield, is there some obvious reason why it would make sense to start with FUT ahead of FUE?
April 27, 2015
Answer: FUE FUT or Both It does not really matter if you use FUE or FUT first. You have to see what priorities you have and whether or not you want to avoid having a scar on the back.Unlike a few years ago, we believe both procedures are equally effective and can provide full growth. I don't see much advantage of combining the two unless:If you want to maximize the numbers of grafts with FUE. FUE can get hair from the areas that FUT might not like some areas of temples, beard and body hairSave money by doing a portion of grafts through strip. In this case you still get a scar on the back and you don't even have to do the FUE part.I think the best is to discuss this with your hair transplant surgeon and the two of you will find the best way of doing it based on your priorities and limitations.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 27, 2015
Answer: FUE FUT or Both It does not really matter if you use FUE or FUT first. You have to see what priorities you have and whether or not you want to avoid having a scar on the back.Unlike a few years ago, we believe both procedures are equally effective and can provide full growth. I don't see much advantage of combining the two unless:If you want to maximize the numbers of grafts with FUE. FUE can get hair from the areas that FUT might not like some areas of temples, beard and body hairSave money by doing a portion of grafts through strip. In this case you still get a scar on the back and you don't even have to do the FUE part.I think the best is to discuss this with your hair transplant surgeon and the two of you will find the best way of doing it based on your priorities and limitations.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 27, 2015
Answer: FUE versus FUT Virtually all our San Diego hair transplant patients who have experienced both follicular unit extraction (with Neograft) and follicular unit transfer procedures say they much prefer FUE because of the quicker recovery, decreased pain, and no linear scar. FUE does decrease hair density in the donor area and therefore may reduce yield of a future FUT procedure. However, most patients will continue with FUE if they need future sessions and therefore it is not an issue. You should discuss the plan with your chosen physician and how he would address future sessions.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
April 27, 2015
Answer: FUE versus FUT Virtually all our San Diego hair transplant patients who have experienced both follicular unit extraction (with Neograft) and follicular unit transfer procedures say they much prefer FUE because of the quicker recovery, decreased pain, and no linear scar. FUE does decrease hair density in the donor area and therefore may reduce yield of a future FUT procedure. However, most patients will continue with FUE if they need future sessions and therefore it is not an issue. You should discuss the plan with your chosen physician and how he would address future sessions.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
