Rotation of shaped implants was a common problem many years ago, as were other issues that led to them being taken off the market. It is not a problem associated with the current generation of shaped, form-stable, highly cohesive silicone gel breast implants. One U.S. implant company has recently reported a rotation rate of zero in a clinical study of almost 1800 patients with shaped breast implants. The newest shaped or ‘anatomic’ breast implants are completely different medical devices than those that were available twenty years ago. Previous generations of shaped implants were both silicone gel and saline implants, and none of them performed well over the long term. The older shaped gel implants contained liquid silicone gel, and the shells had a high rate of failure and gel ‘bleed’ (i.e. some of the liquid silicone gel could ooze through tiny pores in the outer shell and escape the implant, without a tear or hole in the implant shell). The shaped saline implants felt firm and unnatural, had a tendency to rotate and also had a high failure rate. Breast implant technology has advanced considerably since the days of the first ‘anatomic’ implants, and the new generation of shaped silicone gel implants has many advantages over the older versions:1.The new ones are highly cohesive, meaning the gel is in a semi-solid state. Cut one of these implants in half and you’re holding half of a solid implant.2.The shells are much more durable, producing lower implant failure rates.3.A wide variety of shapes and sizes are available, meaning a ‘custom fit’ can be found for each patient.4.The rates of capsular contracture are much lower (the reported rate varies by manufacturer). The new generation of shaped, form-stable implants (available in the U.S. for less than two years now) are an ideal choice for particular patients. One type of patient that is well-served by these implants is the fit, athletic, A to small B patient who has very little lower pole tissue, needs to have the inframammary fold lowered, and who wants to transition up 1 or 2 cup sizes. This is one of the most challenging augmentation scenarios, as there is little natural tissue to conceal the implants. I get results with shaped, form stable implants in these patients that were previously not achievable with round devices. I have been placing shaped, form-stable breast implants for a year and a half and I have seen no cases of rotation / malposition, no cases of visible folds / ripples, and no cases of capsular contracture. Rotation of these implants should not occur if pocket dissection is meticulous. Not every patient needs a shaped implant – plenty of patients do just fine with a pair of round implants. But for specific indications, in my opinion, there is not a better implant choice. Especially if the goal is a natural-appearing breast augmentation result.