Most PS in my area don’t offer this approach. I understand that if done this way a new incision would have to be created should I need a revision surgeries down the road. I would just really like to avoid having a scars on my breast.
Answer: Why don’t more PS use the transaxillary breast augmentation using endoscopy technique? The transaxillary approach involves making an incision in the armpit. The pocket for the implant can be dissected blindly and bluntly with special instruments. It can also be dissected with an endoscope and electrocautery under direct vision. The endoscope allows visualization of bleeding vessels that can be directly controlled. Reported disadvantages include poor pocket visualization and control, which is largely dependent upon surgeon comfort with the procedure and the number of procedures performed through this approach. The scar in the hairbearing area of the axilla may cause shaving difficulties. If removal of the implant is necessary in the future due to implant rupture or capsular contracture, an incision on the breast mound, either periareolar or inframammary, may be necessary.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Why don’t more PS use the transaxillary breast augmentation using endoscopy technique? The transaxillary approach involves making an incision in the armpit. The pocket for the implant can be dissected blindly and bluntly with special instruments. It can also be dissected with an endoscope and electrocautery under direct vision. The endoscope allows visualization of bleeding vessels that can be directly controlled. Reported disadvantages include poor pocket visualization and control, which is largely dependent upon surgeon comfort with the procedure and the number of procedures performed through this approach. The scar in the hairbearing area of the axilla may cause shaving difficulties. If removal of the implant is necessary in the future due to implant rupture or capsular contracture, an incision on the breast mound, either periareolar or inframammary, may be necessary.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Shortly: if your surgeon knows how to do it there is no better way why to have scars if you can have none??? I think a lot of surgeons are against transaxillary breast augmentation because they do not feel comfortable performing it or they even never tried or got train in performing it. I learned how to safely and successfully perform this type of breast augmentation over 25 years ago. Since then I augmented many thousands of breasts this way and this is my experience: it is my preferred way to do it (for a right candidate) my main reason is: why mutilate perfect beautiful woman's body if you can avoid it? And there is really no downside, it is not true that are more complications, problems or capsular contractures than with any other way to do it. If surgeon is skilled and knows how to perform axillary breast augmentation results are very predictable. I would not be repeating this procedure for over 25 years if it would be causing problems. It would be insane since I sometimes have 10 patients /week and would ha to deal with a lot of unhappy women... And do not trust surgeons who tell you under the breast incision is great. Frequently, they are quite visible, stretched, dark, keloidal and quite annoying. Especially in small breasts that have no folds make these scars impossible to hide. Last time I performed inframammary incision is over 20 years ago. There is no need for that. Armpit incisions ALWAYS heal great, and they are either invisible or look like a wrinkle in your armpit. And in my experience problems that people are describing are if anything less common that with other approaches.
Helpful
Answer: Shortly: if your surgeon knows how to do it there is no better way why to have scars if you can have none??? I think a lot of surgeons are against transaxillary breast augmentation because they do not feel comfortable performing it or they even never tried or got train in performing it. I learned how to safely and successfully perform this type of breast augmentation over 25 years ago. Since then I augmented many thousands of breasts this way and this is my experience: it is my preferred way to do it (for a right candidate) my main reason is: why mutilate perfect beautiful woman's body if you can avoid it? And there is really no downside, it is not true that are more complications, problems or capsular contractures than with any other way to do it. If surgeon is skilled and knows how to perform axillary breast augmentation results are very predictable. I would not be repeating this procedure for over 25 years if it would be causing problems. It would be insane since I sometimes have 10 patients /week and would ha to deal with a lot of unhappy women... And do not trust surgeons who tell you under the breast incision is great. Frequently, they are quite visible, stretched, dark, keloidal and quite annoying. Especially in small breasts that have no folds make these scars impossible to hide. Last time I performed inframammary incision is over 20 years ago. There is no need for that. Armpit incisions ALWAYS heal great, and they are either invisible or look like a wrinkle in your armpit. And in my experience problems that people are describing are if anything less common that with other approaches.
Helpful
June 28, 2019
Answer: Axillary incision This incision does carry the highest risks, including the highest risks of capsule formation. The axillary skin is not as clean of an area as the breast skin. Also, it can be a difficult incision to reuse, and may not work well with all implants. When you are sleeveless and raise your arm, the incision may be noticeable. More women go sleeveless than bare chested. For these reasons, I choose not to use this incision.
Helpful
June 28, 2019
Answer: Axillary incision This incision does carry the highest risks, including the highest risks of capsule formation. The axillary skin is not as clean of an area as the breast skin. Also, it can be a difficult incision to reuse, and may not work well with all implants. When you are sleeveless and raise your arm, the incision may be noticeable. More women go sleeveless than bare chested. For these reasons, I choose not to use this incision.
Helpful
September 9, 2019
Answer: Transaxillary breast implants Many plastic surgeon, including myself, have tried the transaxillary breast approach at some time in their practice. I think most who have tried it eventually realize it has no great advantage over other incisions. The surgeon doesn’t have as much control or visualization. If you really wanted it done that way I’m sure you could find surgeons willing to do it, but I suspect most will try to talk you out of it.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
September 9, 2019
Answer: Transaxillary breast implants Many plastic surgeon, including myself, have tried the transaxillary breast approach at some time in their practice. I think most who have tried it eventually realize it has no great advantage over other incisions. The surgeon doesn’t have as much control or visualization. If you really wanted it done that way I’m sure you could find surgeons willing to do it, but I suspect most will try to talk you out of it.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
June 26, 2019
Answer: Breast augmentation scar planning A well-planned breast augmentation using an infra-mammary incision should have the resultant scar in the infra-mammary fold itself - its basically invisible in that position. Check out my before/after photos and see what you think. Most PS do not perform trans-ax breast augmentation because of the implant malposition and capsular contracture issues associated with this procedure.
Helpful
June 26, 2019
Answer: Breast augmentation scar planning A well-planned breast augmentation using an infra-mammary incision should have the resultant scar in the infra-mammary fold itself - its basically invisible in that position. Check out my before/after photos and see what you think. Most PS do not perform trans-ax breast augmentation because of the implant malposition and capsular contracture issues associated with this procedure.
Helpful