Why Do Some People Respond Better to Dysport for Deep Wrinkles?

Thank you for your question. Everyone respond differently to Dysport or Botox. Its all about provider and patient preference, your previous history to the products, their longevity when administered, and how quickly your body metabolizes the product. Both products are very similar with very similar results and side effects, but these results can vary person to person. Be certain to be under the supervision of a board certified dermatologist or plastic surgeon with expertise in injectables for an evaluation and for the safest and most effective treatments. I hope this helps.

Both Botox and Dysport are forms of botulinum toxins and basically do the same thing. However, Dysport has fewer proteins surrounding the main molecule, which allows it to be tolerated by the body to a greater extent than Botox. Also this slight structural difference causes it to be broken down at a much slower rate. However results vary with individual physiology. So if Botox does not give the results that the patient wants, Dysport should be considered. And likewise, Botox should be considered if Dysport does not deliver ideal outcomes. 

There is a study which compared the effects of Botox versus Dysport on crows feet. The subjects had Botox injected on one side of the face and Dysport on the other side. According to the results, Dysport outperformed Botox in the overall reduction of crows feet. 

One patient complained about the lines between his eyebrows. He had used Botox in the past, but did not get the kind of  results he wanted in this particular area. His wife also had the same issue. Both of them had Dysport injected on the same day and noted that  the results much faster. They were also impressed by the efficacy of Dysport on this glabellar region. Here is a video where the patient describes this. 

I certainly have not seen that Dysport or Botox works better on deep wrinkles.  In fact, I have studies Dysport on one side and Botox on the other side in several patients, with their consent, and we observed the effects each day for the first week, then weekly, then monthly and saw no appreciable differences in the onset and duration of the treatments.