Im looking to know if by putting implants subfascially, i'd have a natural teardrop shape that would fall out of the breast (like many submuscular or subglandular), not a "stuck on look". I have small breast , probably a bit less that a B cup.
January 27, 2015
Answer: Small breast subfascial implant Thanks for your inquiry. Your implant shape and size selection will have a lot to do with the final result. As a small breast woman I would recommend submuscular implants to reduce rippling, palpability.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
January 27, 2015
Answer: Small breast subfascial implant Thanks for your inquiry. Your implant shape and size selection will have a lot to do with the final result. As a small breast woman I would recommend submuscular implants to reduce rippling, palpability.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
September 21, 2018
Answer: Subfascial is essentially a sub glandular breast augmentation Despite the marketing hype related to sub facial breast augmentation, many us have always performed sub glandular breast augmentation in a subfascial fashion. Subfascial simply means that the layer of tissue covering the muscle is lifted with the breast glandular tissue above it when creating a sub glandular pocket. Traditionally, many surgeons used a blunt technique to lift the gland off the muscle, and the natural plane of separation was above the fascia. For surgeons who use a controlled approach with electrocautery to develop the pocket and minimize bleeding, it is a routine matter to lift the fascia off the muscle with the glandular tissue to create the pocket. The benefit of this is a more controlled method of creating the pocket, with less bleeding and risk of hematoma, and a slightly thicker tissue layer to cover the implant. If you are extremely thin, it is still recommended that you place the implants under the muscle to have more padding over the implant; but if for any reason you do choose a subglandular approach, like closer implant placement for more cleavage, then definitely I prefer creating the sub glandular pocket in this subfascial plane. The main disadvantage of sub glandular placement is the higher risk of capsular contracture, and there is no evidence that sub glandular subfascial placement has any benefit over traditional suprafascial subglandular placement in this regard.
Helpful 2 people found this helpful
September 21, 2018
Answer: Subfascial is essentially a sub glandular breast augmentation Despite the marketing hype related to sub facial breast augmentation, many us have always performed sub glandular breast augmentation in a subfascial fashion. Subfascial simply means that the layer of tissue covering the muscle is lifted with the breast glandular tissue above it when creating a sub glandular pocket. Traditionally, many surgeons used a blunt technique to lift the gland off the muscle, and the natural plane of separation was above the fascia. For surgeons who use a controlled approach with electrocautery to develop the pocket and minimize bleeding, it is a routine matter to lift the fascia off the muscle with the glandular tissue to create the pocket. The benefit of this is a more controlled method of creating the pocket, with less bleeding and risk of hematoma, and a slightly thicker tissue layer to cover the implant. If you are extremely thin, it is still recommended that you place the implants under the muscle to have more padding over the implant; but if for any reason you do choose a subglandular approach, like closer implant placement for more cleavage, then definitely I prefer creating the sub glandular pocket in this subfascial plane. The main disadvantage of sub glandular placement is the higher risk of capsular contracture, and there is no evidence that sub glandular subfascial placement has any benefit over traditional suprafascial subglandular placement in this regard.
Helpful 2 people found this helpful
