Hi: 7 years ago I had breast cancer, had a lumpectomy, then had radiation. Then 3 years later I had another cancer event in a different location on the same breast, so I had a mastectomy. I tried an immediate expander and implant, but it failed due to an infection pretty quickly. Since then I have had nothing. I now want to try the expander/implant again at the recommendation of a good PS who thinks I have about a 75% chance of success this time. Do you think this makes sense? I have 3 young children and really want to avoid the tram process if possible, but I would love to throw out my inserts. Any input is much appreciated!! Stephanie
Answer: TRY IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION AGAIN? First off, congratulations on being a survivor! Now, you face a common challenge for breast cancer patients who have had radiation. It is unfortunate that expander - implant reconstruction has such a high rate of infection and capsular contracture in irradiated patients because it is typically considered the “easiest” reconstruction option to recover from. The decision to try expander - implant reconstruction again is completely your own as long as you understand that the same risks are still there and you could end up with the same result. I understand that flap procedures can seem a bit overwhelming and the recovery more difficult, but the risk of infection is much lower and there is no risk of capsular contracture because there’s no implant involved. I would recommend discussing more autologous reconstruction options with your plastic surgeon as the TRAM flap is not the only flap available for breast reconstruction. In my experience, most patients prefer a DIEP flap to a TRAM flap because tissue is mobilized from the abdomen and up to the chest wall to create the breast. Again, which type of reconstruction you choose is up to you and your surgeon and I am only making a general suggestion. If you do choose to try the expander – implant reconstruction again it is absolutely possible that you could have an uneventful postoperative course and experience success with no complications; just be prepared for any possible complications given your previous history of infection.Be well and good luck!@norrisplastic
Helpful 2 people found this helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW Answer: TRY IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION AGAIN? First off, congratulations on being a survivor! Now, you face a common challenge for breast cancer patients who have had radiation. It is unfortunate that expander - implant reconstruction has such a high rate of infection and capsular contracture in irradiated patients because it is typically considered the “easiest” reconstruction option to recover from. The decision to try expander - implant reconstruction again is completely your own as long as you understand that the same risks are still there and you could end up with the same result. I understand that flap procedures can seem a bit overwhelming and the recovery more difficult, but the risk of infection is much lower and there is no risk of capsular contracture because there’s no implant involved. I would recommend discussing more autologous reconstruction options with your plastic surgeon as the TRAM flap is not the only flap available for breast reconstruction. In my experience, most patients prefer a DIEP flap to a TRAM flap because tissue is mobilized from the abdomen and up to the chest wall to create the breast. Again, which type of reconstruction you choose is up to you and your surgeon and I am only making a general suggestion. If you do choose to try the expander – implant reconstruction again it is absolutely possible that you could have an uneventful postoperative course and experience success with no complications; just be prepared for any possible complications given your previous history of infection.Be well and good luck!@norrisplastic
Helpful 2 people found this helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW Answer: Implant Given the fact you have had irradiation of the breast and chest in the past makes you more risky to have an implant based reconstruction.
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW Answer: Implant Given the fact you have had irradiation of the breast and chest in the past makes you more risky to have an implant based reconstruction.
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW
March 21, 2018
Answer: Retry Breast Reconstruction Hello Stephanie, I believe you have many options for reconstruction. I would advise you to fill out the BRA score and see what your risks are for each type of reconstruction. This may help you make a decision along with your plastic surgeons recommendation. Good Luck!
Helpful
Book a consultation
CONTACT NOW March 21, 2018
Answer: Retry Breast Reconstruction Hello Stephanie, I believe you have many options for reconstruction. I would advise you to fill out the BRA score and see what your risks are for each type of reconstruction. This may help you make a decision along with your plastic surgeons recommendation. Good Luck!
Helpful
Book a consultation
CONTACT NOW
FIND THE RIGHT
TREATMENT FOR YOU
March 8, 2018
Answer: Breast reconstruction revision with history of infection. Thank you for your questions. Radiated skin is usually non forgiving when it comes to complications. You can certainly try another tissue expander and implant but understanding the high risks associated with the procedure. If you use autologous tissue- your own tissue, a TRAM is not necessarily the only option. The perforator free flaps are a good alternative for natural tissue. I would see a board certified plastic surgeon who specialized in microsurgery specifically perforator flaps for a consult. Best of luck!
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW March 8, 2018
Answer: Breast reconstruction revision with history of infection. Thank you for your questions. Radiated skin is usually non forgiving when it comes to complications. You can certainly try another tissue expander and implant but understanding the high risks associated with the procedure. If you use autologous tissue- your own tissue, a TRAM is not necessarily the only option. The perforator free flaps are a good alternative for natural tissue. I would see a board certified plastic surgeon who specialized in microsurgery specifically perforator flaps for a consult. Best of luck!
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW
January 22, 2013
Answer: Failed breast reconstruction - implant or flap?
Thank you for this great question and hope that all of these answers will assist you in your decision. Attempted implant-based reconstruction after radiation to the breast typically have a higher complication rate with a significant failure rate. Complications, include, infection, wound complications, capsular contracture, and implant exposure/failure of expansion. There are some very notable papers that have described adequate results with implant-based reconstruction in the setting of an irradiated breast, and so, it is not unreasonable to attempt this again, knowing that there is a significant chance, however, that it may fail again, especially given your previous experience.
Flap-based reconstruction would be the wisest choice to consider, which would bring in well-vascularized tissue from a remote area of your body, thus ameliorating the damage that radiation has caused. With the options for microsurgical, perforator flap breast reconstruction today, the minimal morbidity and functional deficits of these muscle-sparing procedures make them very attractive for women like yourself. The DIEP or SGAP flaps are excellent choices for breast reconstruction using your own tissue, without the need for an implant. Finding a plastic surgeon experienced with performing microsurgical breast reconstruction and discussing this option may be worthwhile.
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW January 22, 2013
Answer: Failed breast reconstruction - implant or flap?
Thank you for this great question and hope that all of these answers will assist you in your decision. Attempted implant-based reconstruction after radiation to the breast typically have a higher complication rate with a significant failure rate. Complications, include, infection, wound complications, capsular contracture, and implant exposure/failure of expansion. There are some very notable papers that have described adequate results with implant-based reconstruction in the setting of an irradiated breast, and so, it is not unreasonable to attempt this again, knowing that there is a significant chance, however, that it may fail again, especially given your previous experience.
Flap-based reconstruction would be the wisest choice to consider, which would bring in well-vascularized tissue from a remote area of your body, thus ameliorating the damage that radiation has caused. With the options for microsurgical, perforator flap breast reconstruction today, the minimal morbidity and functional deficits of these muscle-sparing procedures make them very attractive for women like yourself. The DIEP or SGAP flaps are excellent choices for breast reconstruction using your own tissue, without the need for an implant. Finding a plastic surgeon experienced with performing microsurgical breast reconstruction and discussing this option may be worthwhile.
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW