Which is better, Exilis Vs. Ultherapy?

Question

I am looking into the two possibilities for facial skin tightening. I live in Europe. Exilis is available locally in a nearby clinic at a good price point (50 Euros per treatment to the whole face). The Ultherapy is only available in a clinic in another country and is probably more expensive. They are on holiday now, so I don't know the cost. Can anyone tell me if one treatment is better than the other or are they both the same. I'm looking for diminished eyebags and tighter cheeks.

Ron Shelton, MD · Answer

Ultherapy can help lift facial sagging features without surgery by delivering focused ultrasound energy deeply and contract the supporting structures and induce collagen. Exilis is not focused ultrasound energy that can liquify the fat cells to reduce bulk fat so the two devices are not to be compared. Exilis may be compared with CoolSculpting, a device by Zeltiq that can recontour fat by killing the fat cells permanently and reducing the bulk of the fat bulge, while Exilis may liberate the fat from the fat cells and not provide long term reduction in fat cell numbers.

Steven L. Ringler, MD, FACS · Answer

Thank you for this excellent question. Ulthera is a non-invasive focused ultrasound  treatment that is designed to lift and tighten the tissue deep to the skin.  Exilis is a radio-frequency device, designed to heat and tighten the skin. I think there is a lot of overlap with these devices and many patients can get good results with either one.  Ultherapy typically cost more than Exilis because of the consumables used in the treatment..  There is no downtime with either Ulthera or Exilis, and the results should last about 12-18 months. I have had Ultherapy twice, and am happy with the results. The only down side with Exilis is that it requires a series of treatments. Good luck.

Ariel Haus, MD · Answer

Thank you for this well thought through question.  I use both Ultherapy (which uses focussed ultrasound energy) and Exilis (which uses radiofrequency energy) in my clinic.  Exilis is a very good treatment and the best results are achieved over a course of treatments spaced at regular intervals. Ultherapy on the other hand only requires one treatment.  
In my personal experience Ultherapy will provide the patient with longer lasting results than Exilis but it also takes longer for the best results to be noticeable.  The results from an Exilis treatment can be noticed almost immediately.  Like many treatments, what is going to be the most preferred option for one patient may not suit somebody else.  
I would encourage you to have your treatment at a clinic that offers a range of treatment modalities so that you have the chance to find the treatment that is going to work best for you.   I would also encourage you to ensure that if you do decide to have treatment with Ultherapy, that the clinic is using the genuine Ultherapy system and not a generic 'focussed ultrasound treatment' that will not provide you with the same results.   I hope that this has been helpful and I wish you the best of luck with your results.  Dr Haus, London.

Grant Stevens, MD · Answer

Hi and thank you for your question. We have had both in our practice. Currently, we primarily use Ultherapy because of we seen results that surpass the other technologies.  The ultrasound imagining capability of Ultherapy is just one of the factors that sets it apart from the other skin tightening technologies. Its the only device to be approved for "lifting" versus just tightening, because of how much lifting was seen in the FDA studies. Its the only device to use high intensity, micro-focused ultrasound to deliver the energy, which is a more precise and predictable way to cause collagen denaturation and stimulation of new collagen.  Each TCP (thermal coagulation point) heats the tissue to a minimum of 65 degrees Celsius. With RF technologies, the way the energy is delivered is "bulk heating" which makes it difficult to know which areas are reaching target temperatures. You also only need one Ultherapy every 1-3 years, depending on how much laxity you started with and what your desired results are. Good luck!

Hratch Karamanoukian, MD, FACS · Answer

I have had Ultherapy myself and have performed it since 2011 in hundreds of patients. Exilis uses monopolar RF energy and works via apoptosis of tissue. There is no imaging during treatments which is the beauty of focused ultrasound therapy.Ultherapy is a 2 in 1 device, as it provided high intensity focused ultrasound and delivers it while imaging the area of delivery with B mode ultrasonography. It is TARGETED therapy ! Read the Ultherapy ebook provided on the link below under ebooks.

Remus Repta, MD · Answer

Hello,

	Ulthera is a non-invasive ultrasound based treatment that is designed to treat and tighten the tissue deep to the skin.  It is currently the only treatments available to address laxity of the tissue deep to the skin (aka SMAS).  It does cost more than the non-invasive treatements available for the skin only.  There is no downtime with Ulthera and the results are designed to peak at 90 days and last about one year.

	All the best,

	Dr Remus Repta

Which is better, Exilis Vs. Ultherapy?

Answers (6)

More Ultherapy Questions

I Have Occassional Eyelid Eczema. Would Ultherapy Be Contraindicated for the Eyelids? What About the Face?

Is It OK to Have Ulthera Done if You've Had Sculptra Injections?

If Ultherapy Affects the SMAS Layer What Will Happen when I Plan a Surgical SMASlift

Is Ultherapy for Neck and Jowls an Option at Age 67?

Ultherapy and African American Women? Are There Practice Findings Yet?

Does Ultherapy Work on Marronett Lines Around the Mouth? Didn't See Improvement There.

WE SEND PRETTY
EMAILS