5' 7.5" wt 140-160lb,10%BF-20%BF 3 recs 1. Natrelle, sslp, 340cc,d 13.25, p 3.5 2. Natrelle, scx, 285cc,d 10.5, p 5.0 3. Natrelle, ssf, 365cc,d 12, p 4.9 what should be considered in regards to outcome when choosing an implant that is potentially a smaller BWD or a wider BWD. Should a patient lean toward one or the other based on a certain desired outcome? Will a smaller diameter put me at higher risk for the breast bone gap? Will a wider diameter put me at risk of looking way out of proportion?
Answer: Closing the breast bone gap with breast implants Hello, it is important for you to discuss with your surgeon the advantages versus risks of closing the breast bone gap using implants. Many of my patients have a similar goal of creating tight cleavage with their implants. However, if there is a natural gap between the breasts (as there appears to be in your photos) and the implants are placed close together to fill the gap, they will be only be covered by a thin layer of tissue in the centre of your chest. This means there will be a higher risk of seeing unsightly implant ripples in this area. All implants (even cohesive gel "gummy bear" implants) fold and ripple to some extent in the body so this might be visible if though the thin layer of skin covering the implants. I personally recommend my patients choose implants that actually match their breast width and place them under the breast tissue, even if it means there will be a breast bone (sternal) gap after. However, those who still want their implants close together are advised of the risks of implant palpability and rippling contour in the cleavage region. As mentioned, your own surgeon will be the best source of advice since they would have done a proper in-person examination.
Helpful
Answer: Closing the breast bone gap with breast implants Hello, it is important for you to discuss with your surgeon the advantages versus risks of closing the breast bone gap using implants. Many of my patients have a similar goal of creating tight cleavage with their implants. However, if there is a natural gap between the breasts (as there appears to be in your photos) and the implants are placed close together to fill the gap, they will be only be covered by a thin layer of tissue in the centre of your chest. This means there will be a higher risk of seeing unsightly implant ripples in this area. All implants (even cohesive gel "gummy bear" implants) fold and ripple to some extent in the body so this might be visible if though the thin layer of skin covering the implants. I personally recommend my patients choose implants that actually match their breast width and place them under the breast tissue, even if it means there will be a breast bone (sternal) gap after. However, those who still want their implants close together are advised of the risks of implant palpability and rippling contour in the cleavage region. As mentioned, your own surgeon will be the best source of advice since they would have done a proper in-person examination.
Helpful
January 12, 2022
Answer: Size I would suggest meeting with a board certified plastic surgeon and trying on both sizes to see what you like. Please do not choose an implant that is too large and heavy for your tissue and frame.
Helpful
January 12, 2022
Answer: Size I would suggest meeting with a board certified plastic surgeon and trying on both sizes to see what you like. Please do not choose an implant that is too large and heavy for your tissue and frame.
Helpful
January 12, 2022
Answer: Mini lift with fat transfers or small implants Your breasts are widely separated and have very little tissue in the cleavage area. Augmentation alone will be inadequate to correct this problem. The technique I recommend is a mini lift. Using a circumareola incision, your breast tissue is reshaped, elevated higher on the chest wall and more medial to increase your cleavage. At the same time, fat transfers or small implants can be placed totally submuscular.
Helpful
January 12, 2022
Answer: Mini lift with fat transfers or small implants Your breasts are widely separated and have very little tissue in the cleavage area. Augmentation alone will be inadequate to correct this problem. The technique I recommend is a mini lift. Using a circumareola incision, your breast tissue is reshaped, elevated higher on the chest wall and more medial to increase your cleavage. At the same time, fat transfers or small implants can be placed totally submuscular.
Helpful
January 11, 2022
Answer: BWD Good afternoon,
Helpful
January 11, 2022
Answer: BWD Good afternoon,
Helpful
January 11, 2022
Answer: Implants First of all ignore the bwd thing. It's not a good way to select size. The 385 too small. The others are both fine. You probably wouldn't notice the difference between the two.
Helpful
January 11, 2022
Answer: Implants First of all ignore the bwd thing. It's not a good way to select size. The 385 too small. The others are both fine. You probably wouldn't notice the difference between the two.
Helpful
