How accurate is the program Crisalix 3D to see what breast augmentation would look like?

I believe that 3D imaging is helpful, but what you can't tell from a 3D image is the position of the implant (subglandular or sumuscular) or if the recommended cc's will give you the exact result that you are visualizing.In my practice, I show women before and after pictures of actual patients with similar chest measurements, height, weight and starting volume to them; it's as if they are looking at themselves in a magic mirror of the future. When a women decides what she wants, I know exactly what size implant to order to better achieve that look because the cc's are recorded on every picture.Your plastic surgeon's experience will be even more important than imaging in helping you determine implant size.

The newest updates for the 3D scanner for this Crisalix imaging program are amazing. I think it is increasingly more accurate with the topographical scanner. There are also virtual reality goggles so you can see yourself trying on different implant styles and sizes. I think the results are what one might see at around 3 months. There are no guarantees but it sure is fun. The giggles from the gals wearing the virtual reality goggles has been fun too.

3D imaging is really more of a tool to give you an idea. Sadly, nothing can accurately predict your outcome. This is where the skill and expertise of the surgeon really comes into play. Best, Dr. Nazarian

Thanks for your question.  3D imaging is meant to be a teaching tool rather than an exact representation of how you will look after surgery.  There is no perfect way to predict breast size or shape.

I think that like any tool it is used as a guide and should not be thought of as an exact expected outcome.  Good luck.