Has anyone seen the results of the 'Ideal Implant' with the separate chambers of saline and layers within the implant?

Thank you for your question regarding the new FDA approved IDEAL structured breast implants.  I have been offering the IDEAl structured implants along with saline and silicone gel to my patients for the past year or so. Patients who opt for the IDEAL implant like the natural look and feel of the implant due to the structure but without the concern of a silent rupture that may occur with silicone implants.  The results so far have been impressive. Feel free to contact our office if you'd like to see some of our Before & After pictures of patients with IDEAL implants.  You can also go to the company website for more information and physician locator.  Only a select number of board certified plastic surgeons are approved to provide the implants at this time, but I suspect this number will increase over time. I hope this helps.  

I have been using Ideal Implants for breast augmentation for over a year now and have been quite pleased with the results.  They appear and feel as natural as gel implants and represent an excellent alternative to the Silicone or Saline breast implants. 
The secret is in the design of these implants, which have a double lumen and inner baffles which serve to dampen the motion of the saline fill- creating a soft, natural, flowing implant.  Also, since the Ideal Implant is a “structured” implant design, they tend to resist the natural tendency of an implant to ripple and cave in the superior pole. 

The teardrop implants tend to rotate in the pocket, which requires re-operation to correct.  Also, they only come in a textured surface, which is generally thicker and less natural feeling.  Finally, textured implants are also associated with increased infection rates and the rare Breast Implant Associated Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

I hope that I have answered your questions satisfactorily.  Good Luck!