How Accurate is the Vectra 3D for BA?

Depending on your starting point, the Vectra simulations can be quite accurate.      It is a great tool for communication about what you like and don't like, and at least can give you and your surgeon a good starting point for what implant shape and size that you will like.    The differences you are considering about size are really very small, so talk you your surgeon about your concernsand trust them to make a decision within the size ranges you agree on.    

I have a Vectra, and it works like I thought it would: It is a cool tool that helps patients "see" what they might look like, but the role of experience and clinical judgement is more important.  I always change the implant position, for example, from where Vectra puts it, as I think clinically I put it slightly higher than Vectra simulates it.

Although the 3D simulation has been a very valuable tool for educating patients about their own anatomy and showing them general estimates about the changes possible, it is not possible to show exact outcomes or guarantee a look

During consultation it is our goal to match your goals with what is possible and in your best interest long term. A difference of a few millimeters or cc's rarely determines a sucessful outcome. However, a larger implant does stretch your tissues more and will increase the risks slightly of having problems such as visible edges, ripples and gravity related problems.  If you still have concerns then call the office to arrange for further discussion and consultation.

 

Best regards,

Dr.  Mosher

Three-dimensional photography in cosmetic surgery has many advantages:

1.     By making it easier for women to gain an understanding of aesthetic surgery options and what to expect from the treatment process, application of this technology will help alleviate fears, encourage women to take an active role in treatment, and improve their experience and outcomes. 



2.     Additionally, the three-dimensional photographs can assist the surgeon in the operating room by serving as an intraoperative guide.  This will translate to improved results. 



3.     Finally, comparison of before and after results with the three-dimensional photographs will allow for critique of technique and facilitate quality improvement. However, it is no substitute for experience and a thorough consultation.

I have found computer imaging to be a useful addition to the communication tools that we already use when it comes to preoperative communication of patients' goals. This preoperative communication is one of the important keys to success when it comes to breast augmentation surgery. Although helpful,  the technology is not necessarily perfect when it comes to predicting what size/profile of breast implants will best achieve a patient's goals. Again, in my opinion it is best use as a communication tool only and not as a “guarantee” of outcomes to be expected. You may find the attached link, describing this technology, helpful to you.