Facelift at age 30 due to genetics? (photo)

Thank you for reaching out and sharing your concerns. I understand that at 30, considering a facelift might seem early, but in some cases, genetics and weight fluctuations play a significant role in facial sagging, regardless of age.
Based on your photos, I believe the best approach for you would be a Deep Plane Facelift, rather than fillers or a cheek lift with an under-eye incision. Fillers often provide only a temporary effect and, in your case, the key issue seems to be the descent of deeper facial tissues, not volume loss. A Deep Plane Facelift works by lifting and repositioning these deeper structures, giving your face a more defined and harmonious look while maintaining a completely natural result.
My goal is to ensure that you not only achieve a refreshed and youthful appearance but also feel truly comfortable and confident with your results. If you’d like, I’d be happy to discuss this in more detail during a consultation to explore the best options for you.
Looking forward to hearing from you!
Best,

Thanks Lilla29 for your question! It's understandable that you're looking for solutions to address the saggy skin you're experiencing. It's frustrating when a procedure doesn't deliver the desired results, as it can be emotionally and financially taxing.
The mid-face is the main goal of cheek lift surgery using an under-eye incision, which raises and realigns the cheeks to enhance volume and definition. To reduce obvious scarring, the under-eye incision—also referred to as a transconjunctival approach—is frequently utilized.
It can successfully treat drooping cheeks and enhance the appearance of the area beneath the eyes, but it might not be enough if your neck and lower face have a lot of loose skin.
The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), a layer of tissue supporting the skin and facial muscles, is one of the deeper tissues and systems of the face that are targeted by a deep plane micro facelift. It gives the neck, lower face, and midface a more thorough lift.
A broader variety of issues, such as jowls, neck laxity, and drooping cheeks, can be addressed by it. is more intrusive than a cheek lift and has a longer recovery time, but it provides a more natural-looking and long-lasting outcome than a standard micro facelift.
Since your neck and lower face appear to have a lot of loose skin, a deep plane micro facelift would be a better choice than a cheek lift.
Selecting a board-certified plastic surgeon with a wealth of cosmetic surgery experience is essential. Make appointments with a number of board-certified plastic surgeons who focus in face operations. Talk about your objectives, goals, and concerns throughout your sessions. After evaluating your face structure, the surgeon will suggest the best course of action for you.
Hope this was helpful!
Best wishes,
Dr Ali Sajjadian

Thank you for your question. Based on your description, the concern seems to involve midface sagging and volume loss, especially following a fat graft that did not yield the desired result.
One of the most important elements to evaluate in cases like this is malar (cheekbone) projection. When projection in the upper cheek is low, it can accentuate sagging in the midface and make the lower face appear heavier, even in younger patients.
Given your age and the localized nature of your concern, the most suitable and least invasive surgical option may be an endoscopic midface lift. This approach targets the source of midface descent directly and helps restore contour without the extent of a full deep plane facelift.
A proper evaluation of your cheek structure, skin quality, and facial proportions would help determine if this targeted method can address your concerns effectively.
Warm regards,Op. Dr. Güray YeşiladalıBoard-Certified Plastic Surgeon