Lux 1540: Stories
Write a ReviewFraxel Ruined my Skin and Life
- Bad results from Palomar Lux
- updated 9 months ago
- Not Worth It
- Cost: $800
- USA
I had one Palomar 1540 restore treatment a little...
- 3 Aug 2011
I had one Palomar 1540 restore treatment a little over two years ago and it ruined the texture of my skin and broke nearly every blood vessel on my face. Before the procedure I had near perfect skin except for some fine lines around the eyes.
The healing process went exactly as described yet two weeks after I started to have major issues such as broken blood vessels, wrinkles that were not visible before and a strange grid like pattern all over my entire face. When I went back to the tech who preformed the procedure she informed me that the grid-like pattern would shed off in time and the broken vessels were probably there to begin with even though it was not noted in the pre-op report.
Two years later the strange pattern isstill present along with more broken veins and extremely dry skin. I have spent a ton of money trying to repair the laser damage but nothing seems to have worked. Please do not do this procedure unless your skin is really bad and even then I still would hesitate.
I am 3.5 years out from one 1540 treatment and my...
- 25 Aug 2012
Improvement in their patients skin.
Great review?
My Doctor: name not provided
My rating:
I do not blame the tech who preformed it nor the doctor just Palomar
All the Best,
-J.J.
Why do you have a problem with filing a complaint? Even if the operator is at fault, the F.D.A. and manufacturer should have this information. Products and drugs are recalled daily based on this type of reporting. In addition, if the manufacturer is aware of these side efffects (even if the percentages are low), then it is the obligation of the manufacturer to make this information available. Of course, I'm sure it is much easier to blame the operator.
Fractional photothermolysis is the science whether it is Fraxel or Palomar. I do agree with your point that people are "running their mouths in regards to things they don't understand". How could someone understand that a medically approved device can actually cause harm and damage especially when they were never informed of the possible side effects and adverse reactions? They were promised great results with little downtime. According to DrugWatch, 71% of all Class III (highest level) medical devices cleared through the FDA's 501(k) process are recalled. All operator error? Let's look at your drug analogy....the arthritis drug Vioxx was recalled in 2004 (after 5 years on the market) due to increased risk of heart attacks and stroke not because the patient's or prescibing doctor's negligence. Interesting to note, both the FDA and manufacturing company were both criticized (to the tune of $5 billion dollars) for ignoring the evidence of the dangers of Vioxx before the recall. It is estimated that 140,000 people were affected in this drug recall alone. Sorry, I can't buy the "patients not doing their homework" theory your present.
Fair enough. However, I maintain that "patients not doing their homework or the clinicians not being more thorough" is not the only problem. It does not explain how 71% percent (3 out of 4) medical devices are recalled even after receiving FDA's 501(k) clearance. If you want patients to do their homework, why do you have a problem with filing complaints? Without knowledge from patients, doctors, providers, manufacturers and the like, how do we gain this knowledge? I shutter to think that Vioxx would still be on the market if no one ever came forward with their complaints and complications. I have no problem with you "running your mouth" about your good experience. In return, I ask that you should not have a problem with the same.