eMatrix: Stories
Write a ReviewNot Sure Yet - Cooper City, FL
- msrubi
- posted 1 year ago
- updated 9 months ago
- Not Worth It
- Cost: $1,000
- Ageless Skin Med Spa (Cooper City, FL)
Had my first treatment yesterday. I did smell the...
- 18 Feb 2012
Had my first treatment yesterday. I did smell the burning skin that everyone complains about (it's actually the little hairs being singed). It did sting but quite tolerable with the numbing cream applied 1 hour prior. Felt like a bad sunburn for about 3 hours then didn't feel anything at all.
Almost went to the gym but after looking at it thought better due to the burned checkerboard appearance. LOL. Feels fine today, still looks bad but going to the gym anyway. Can't stay in for 3-4 days. Can't wait for the next tx next month and I did buy a package of 3. Too soon to say if it's worth it-I'll make that assessment after the third tx.
Ended up only doing two of these (one at the spa...
- 9 Sep 2012
Great review?
My Doctor: Join to view doctor's name
My rating:
Love this spa. Erin is very experienced and knowledgeable. Also very patient. Takes the time to answer questions and return calls/emails. Staff is very professional and courteous.
Comments (27)
Sort by



Thank you for updating us on your final results, or lack there of unfortunately. :-/
Meanwhile, after I started that, I found the woman who does these microcurrent tx and the results are dramatic from her personal before/after pictures. I didn't want to start that without finishing this first.
I don't see any place in the middle of these threads to upload pictures but I found a place here called 'REVIEWS" of Matrix and that's where I will share them after I get the last Matrix; (I could leave a note here) however, I'm not waiting another six months as the jowls, fat pads or whatever they are are still there and it is really bothering me and like you said, this tx isn't going to fix that.
I'm not getting any younger so I'm not waiting another six months for the subtle change I have yet to see on myself or anyone else on this website; as soon as I get the last Matrix tx and per BOTH estheticians recommendations as well, I'm going to Josephine Ramos to get six micocurrent she combines with some peels geared to your skin. I was really impressed with the one treatment I had with her; most of all, her personal before/after pictures are dramatic but both she and the new Matrix esthetician say to finish the Matrix before doing that as it creates a better platform to get best results. Hope that is clear.
This is how it is described: " the “non-surgical face lift” this treatment uses micro electric stimulation to tone the underlying muscles of your face, increasing circulation and releasing collagen to lift and sculpt your features in a way that takes years off you appearance. Totally relaxing and painless."
Thanks for the follow up. Definitely let us know of you see improvements over the next 6 months. Ematrix is not marketed for skin tightening. It's for scars and texture improvement. The maker of ematrix (syneron) has a product called Refirme that they market for skin tightening. You can go to the syneron site to find out more. I can't speak to what Is different about the machines or settIngs that would differentiate the outcome. Can't wait to hear what happens :). Good luck.
If this isn't an issue for your skin type - it may be a moot point for you, period.
Hyperpigmentation is dark patching. Hypopigmentation is white patching (absence of color). Both are inflammatory responses. I have both and the they became significant challenges after this procedure. The hypo usually doesn't resolve. They Hyperpigmentation is treatable, but with a lot of work and emphatic use of sunscreen and sun avoidance, etc. My skin type is susceptable to to this - though I had taken such good care of it to maintain even coloring - that someone might not have realized what a problem it would be with lasers or laser-like procedures. eMatrix is advertised as something that is good for all skin types.
It will be very interesting to hear what this person says. Because they want to sell these services, they tend to minimize the risks or downplay the fact that many don't see any "significant" results. In addition, everyone's response is different so that adds a variable layer. Good luck. Hopefully you like what you hear - or this person may have some other solutions for you.
:). It's interesting how things can translate (poorly) and how everyone has their sensitive points (which we all do). Understood - and I see how you might have taken my message.
When it comes to how people spend their money, how much they spend and spending whatever it takes to help feel positive - I'm definitely not one to pass judgment. The money I've put into this stuff over the past two years is criminal so I'm not one to talk.
I started my journey after a bad break-up. However, if someone had said, you can keep your face the way it is and give every penny you have to charity. . . I would have done it it in a minute knowing what I now know :).
Whatever your goal. . .if there was a $5,000 solution that I thought really worked - I'd definitely say treat yourself!! If it was $10,000 and guaranteed to change your life - I'd say, sign me up too! I did have $4,000 Total FX laser and it did work sort-of (but that's a whole 'nother story and it's not for everyone).
For what it's worth. . . my personal opinion is that the eMatrix dangles a carrot, but doesn't deliver. . . so "I chased that carrot" for 6 sessions and didn't get the results. Some others on RealSelf have had good experiences and you should definitely hear what they did to get those results.
For example: 1) At what level was their treatment - A, B, C? 2) Even within each level, there's a range of "strengths" that can be applied depending on the patient. 3) How many pulses for one session? (I think there is a 200 pulse and a 100 pulse package). 4) Which handpiece (small or larger grid - one is supposedly more ablative)?
I think my provider was too aggressive - High C, small and large grid, 200 pulses, every 4- 6 weeks.I didn't make this info up - but I'm not sure what to believe anymore :(. As far as I know, the company condones this and we're not doctors. Bottom line - I only saw damage and feel stupid because common sense should have told me that something wasn't right. Unfortunately, people who have not had agressive (enough) eMatrix treatments have complained that they saw no change at all. It's a catch with this product.
Some providers aren't aware of the options or don't offer them so they'll say that we don't know what we're talking about :). Again, others on RealSelf who have had success will be the ones to speak with further.
I'm a little too blunt for the sake of making a point - but I really, really do wish you good things and hope you are good to yourself. I apologize if you thought I was suggesting anything other than the fact that this product is a crap shoot (in my opinion.) Take care - GFGB
I wish the 50 plus percent people who do get benefit from ANYTHING would share their pictures as this mATRIX modality really seems speculative when you explain it at paragraph 6...VERY enlightening and shows how complex it is and that explains why everybody not getting same results as I said here or somewhere, this does'n't sound like something anyone can learn in one weekend and if it's only been out there a year, then seems like we are the guini pigs?
I think eMatrix came out in 2010? Maybe 2009. It seemed to start picking up more steam about a year ago as more facilities started providing it and more people started hearing about it. I personally don't think it's marketing claims/brochures are accurate and any information beyond the marketing verbiage is very weak and limited - including good pictures. Looks like a lot of stock photos, etc. If you Google eMatrix, you'll see the same vanilla stuff everywhere. When I first had it done, the RealSelf approval rate was 100% and there were about five reviews. Now it's at 64% with 45 reviews.
Sassy74 has written about her success and had pictures so you may want to check her out. I followed her and at first, I thought I was having success and agreed. Now, I'm more of the mindset that I was just seeing swelling that was making the skin look smoother. In any event, the more sessions I had, the worse things got and some of it was latent - in that it seemed to show up later. Whatever happend - my skin does not look better and my hyperpigmentation is a big problem now.
There is a guinea pig aspect to this - thus my initial comments about who is providing the services and what their credentials are. More goes into the proper use of these very powerful (and potentially damaging) machines than the consumer knows. The money comment wasn't about personal finances or choices- but rather, questioning if the technology is worth it at any price - no matter how little or much :(. For some, it's absolutely worth it. Good luck.
http://www.realself.com/question/ematrix-compare-fraxel-laser
How Does EMatrix Compare to Fraxel Laser?
eMatrix also uses focused fractional energy but it is Radio Frequency energy, not laser. The thermal response is not confined to a column as laser is - it tends to spread out more broadly beneath the top layer of the skin, so you get the collagen response without a direct corresponding level of external damage to the skin.
The company has termed the effect as "sublative" in that much more is going on than you actually see....somewhat like a pyramid shape as the heat energy fans out after it penetrates the skin. For the most part, RF energy doesn't stir up melanin production so it's seen as a more desirable treatment for some skin types.
Collagen response continues after the superheating from either system for about 6 months at which time what you see is the final response.
As far as stopping the signs of aging, we continue to age no matter what process we apply to our skin, and collagen breakdown will continue as before - With Fraxel or eMatrix you just got a push back in time with the new elastin and collagen fibers your body created as a result of the heat energy.
Web reference: Http://rebeccafitzgeraldmd.com/ematrix.html
Here's are some question to ask at your visit 1) Would she/he be taking before and after pictures of you to look at together? 2) How will the two of you gauge improvement? 3) How will you know that collagen has continued to rebuild 6 months out? (Frankly, I'm curious as to how they tested those claims and with how many people, etc.)
Also, do you have the information about the settings used for the treatments you've already had? Since you didn't get the results you'd like, this may be important information.
Yes, they are different technologies. . . and I'm not a doctor so I don't want to get past my scope of expertise here. There are actually a couple versions of Fraxel, and both are designed to ablate the surface more than eMatrix. One version ablates over a series of sessions, the other does it in one shot but requires more down time - but both are advertised as safer than traditional C02 because of the "fractional" approach to ablation.
eMatrix supposedly only ablates about 5% of the surface (though I was told that the smaller grid that not everyone offers, ablates more) - and the rest is done beneath the surface. The idea is to stimulate collagen building by:creating an "injury" - an idea which isn't completely unique to eMatrix. RF isn't exactly new either. Thermage is Radio Frequency too. . .but used for skin tightening. The jury has been out as to whether or not Thermage is worth it either. In fact, several years ago Thermage was causing Fat Atrophy (something that is pretty well documented) Providers were apparently thinking that if a little was good, then a lot was great and they were cranking up the "heat". That's when RF started getting a bad rap.
eMatrix and providers say that this is impossible because it can't reach the fat level (or something like that). This absolutely may be true. They also say that about IPL which people say can cause fat atrophy. Anyway, I'm not a doctor so I can't speak to this and it's an tricky topic anyway.
I was told about the 6 months ongoing collagen building when I signed up, but at 3 months was told that after about a month to six weeks from my last session, the majority of the results would have shown up when I had my follow-up visit. Again, I'm still curious as to how everyone is validating all these claims - but I'm clearly a cynic :).
Use your best judgment, follow your gut. It tells you a lot! Again, this may work for you with the right provider.
Hi chellamia, Absolutely no judgement intended whatsoever. Sorry if it came across that way. Good luck to you. Ive actually met several people on this site in person and we all wish we had not gone down this path or done anything. Several of us have had revision work and wish someone had been more honest about the dangers - and how different procedures can affect the outcome of another procedure. Again, good luck to you whatever you decide to do. I'm sure there are many on this site who can provide you the guidance you are seeking. Take care.
I'm sorry you still have those marks, how terrible, maybe you have overdone it and now your skin has become overly sensitive? I guess I'm lucky as I could have had a terrible experience like you; has it healed yet? I was paying $75 to $150/treatment; not $500. ...I almost got fraxal a few years ago; but when I saw the massive burn you go through, I canceled it...looks too risky for me and I actually have good skin; I'm working on a very specific area that is starting to sag.
I must say that I don't think any of us really come to this website to be told to “quit while we're ahead” and that we are “chasing a carrot” by a stranger who doesn't even know us nor ever seen us. Maybe you are trying to help but I think we should focus on helping each other; not on making assumptions or judgments; this is very personal; no wonder people are so secretive. All this is very new to me and I try to simply share my experiences. When I can figure out how to show before/after pictures the way I want, I will do so as without that; it's just talk as far as I'm concerned. Some people here have obviously other motives. I would think this Refirm Matrix device has worked on some people but it is obviously VERY INCONSISTENT and for that reason, I wouldn't recommend it but there are other procedures that do have good and amazing results. I think it is telling the dermatologist tried it only six times and sold it as maybe he really didn't know how to use the machine properly?
I also use the tretinoin periodically; not all the time as one would always walk around with peeling skin; my mother also liked nivia too; She was very beautiful and looked like Rita Hayworth . I use to do hair and when she was sitting in my chair at about the age I am now, I told her all she needed was a neck lift and by God, she went and secretly had something done and it turned out to be the best thing she could ever do as she continued to NEVER look her age until she died at 85.
Meanwhile, I do have confidence in the micro currents as used by another esthetician I saw once plus her personal untouched before and after pictures so I'm looking forward to trying that procedure once a week for six weeks; includes peel and dermabrasion too.
BTW, I did take a vacation and without going into detail, after all was said and done, I would rather have used that money on some cosmetic procedure and why is that? Vacations are overrated at this point in my life; they come and go but I have to wake up and look in the mirror for the rest of my life; and now that I'm over 60, it's time I start taking better care of my skin as I don't plan to go quietly into old age.
Chellamia,
One more thing. . .I don't recommend going to another esthetician for this procedure. There are many very good esthetician's out there, but this is A LOT of energy going through your precious skin. . . and if it could actually do what they are claiming it can do - then I'd like to know there's a medical background behind the handpiece - one with lots of insurance! While I personally just don't think this treatment is worth the money for what it does, if you stand a shot - only a medically trained person should administer treatment - and even that's a stretch as I found out. These machines, who can operate them, and the centers that provide them -are far too under regulated, unmonitored, etc. No one cares.
By the way - I met with a well known laser derm who did 6 eMatrix treatments on his wife. He didn't see any results and sold the machine. Keep in mind, this is a derm who rarely meets a laser he doesn't like - he has 40 of the top ones in his office - so eMatrix must be pretty weak.
Hello Chellamia,
I wouldn't be disappointed you didn't have the marks. . . I still have them and they aren't particularly attractive. It is possible that she didn't have you on a high enough setting to get results. Do you know if she did A, B or C and at what level? That said, I would hazard a guess to say that 50% of doctors polled would say that this machine is useless. Another 25% would say they do see results and the remaining 25% don't really see results, but they bought the machine and have to recoup their money so they keep offering the treatments. I've been to enough PS and Derms to have sorted through this mystery. The other issue is that it is very expensive - average $500/treatment and most of the time the doctors don't even do the procedure. The patient ROI is not worth it - at all. The doctor ROI helps them buy their Mercedes!
Here's what I finally figured out - It doesn't matter if it's Laser, RF (eMatrix), IPL (all of which I've tried). . . they all have the potential to do more damage than good - and the collagen building is so nominal - if any. It's a load of expensive crap. I was originally told I would see improvements for up to 6 months. After 6 treatments, I went in for an appt at the 3 month mark - very unhappy with my skin. I asked if I would see any improvement and was told "Oh no, it's been three months - any improvement would have been seen by now." Amazing how the story changes when convenient.
My advice at this point is quit while you are ahead and stop chasing the "dream carrot" that is being dangled. I had beautiful skin. I kept trying more things to fix the damage done by the last "best thing out there". My skin started to breakout - which it never did, get rashy, and burn. It also has some scarring. Keep in mind, I went to one of the top laser docs in OC.
You know what, once I quit all of this crap, my skin started to improve and my facial contours look better. I think all this stuff was severely upsetting my skin's balance and doctors don't coach to proper care or discuss the additional care and hydration required. The hyperpigmentation issues I now have will take another year or to fix - by leaving my skin alone and using SPF like a mad woman.
I use the Clarasonic system (sensitive brush) - which is doing wonders, light glycolic peels and sometimes light TCAs and/or Tretinoin, the Kinerase firming creams, Elta Sunscreen and I slather Nivea (yes, cheap Nivea) on my face at night as often as possible. It was good enough for my beautiful grandmother - it's good enough for me!
I really gauge the use of peels, exfoliation, and tretinoin and do not use daily. Overdoing these is dangerous so if my skin feels sensitive, I back off until things feel better. Healed skin operates a lot better than "zapped" skin that continues to suffer the "injury" that these machines do - even when they say all that "injury" is causing beneficial collagen building. Whatever!!! is what I say.
Good luck. . .save your money on worthless "Syneron" product treatments and take a fabulous vacation!!!!
This comment does not follow our Community Guidelines and/or Terms of Service. We reserve the right to remove any post for any reason.