eMatrix: Stories
Write a ReviewEMATRIX - JUST SAY NO! - California
- Good face gone bad
- posted 1 year ago
- updated 1 year ago
- Not Worth It
- Cost: $3,000
- California
I'm so over all these mystery machines and...
- 23 Mar 2012
I'm so over all these mystery machines and their claims to: a) magically rejuvenate skin with no downtime, b) tighten sagging skin, c) be safe for all skin types d) blah, blah, blah, blah.
I'm here to tell you that I've tried a lot of different things by qualified an (unfortunately) unqualified people and I've finally been hit over the head enough times to say, "Oh, that hurt and was really stupid." So here are a few thoughts:
1) I understand the government has a lot to do with the economy and all - so I propose that it simply admits that anything cosmetic is at your own risk and they really aren't paying any attention when they approve all this crap – or they are getting paid off by these companies.
2) Companies like Syneron (eMatrix) and other second-rate entities should have to admit that they allow anyone with the money - to buy their machines and administer treatment. If a monkey had the cash, they'd sell it and let the monkey brand your face with their grid (4 squares) hand piece.
3) These companies should have to admit that the standards for use of these machines are about as loose as my now sagging skin, and that any studies they provide are merely handpicked best case scenarios in controlled environments. The photos that don't turn out just end up in the shredder.
4) All centers offering treatments like eMATRIX or other non-gold standard products should have to write the word "SUCKER" on your invoice.
So let's look at eMatrix claims:
1) “Sublative Rejuvenation™ treatment may result in improvement of: (To be fair, they do say "may result")
- Wrinkles – Wow. . . that’s a stretch as long as a football field.
- Scars – HUH! I would love to have Syneron explain the squares on my face that look just like their hand piece. The four depressed squares that showed up in the middle of my brow two weeks after a treatment were particularly interesting. A little filler and 35% TCA is helping to fix that. Keep in mind, they claim that this technology does most of it's work below the skin and should have minimal if any impact on the top layer.
- Textural irregularities - You betcha! My skin now appears to have a variety of interesting textures and patterns. I also ended up with some bizarre red rash and severe dryness that lasted for a month. I had not changed any products or experienced anything like this in my life.
2) Minimal downtime: This is pretty relative. If you do "A" treatment which won't do anything at all, you'll be able to go back to work. If you do the "C" treatment - which is the only level that could possibly do anything - you will have a face as red as a baboon's bottom for a few days and you have swelling. You can't go to work.
3) Safe for all skin types: Ok. . reality check. INFLAMMATION and injury to the skin cause hyperpigmentation. Ohhhh. . . I guess that's what would explain the hell I'm going through now to try to get rid of this blotchy mess!
4) Collagen building should continue for months after the series of procedures which should lead to skin tightening: Whatever!
3 months after I was done with this I have a picture that shows lifeless sagging skin. It was like an overnight drop. Let’s say for the sake of argument that I just rapidly aged and this treatment had nothing to do with it. Fine. . . At least there should be no debate that there was no visible benefit in the area of tightened skin. I will admit that I thought I liked this product after the first couple treatments. I'm now of the mindset that I might have just been swollen - or I was in such a state of desperation that I wasn’t paying attention to what was going on.
So, if you saw me post positively, it was early on in my treatment. Some of my discoveries were made with continuing procedures (that I should have stopped) and in the months following. I’m sure they will deny all claims, but - the squares don’t lie! If you are lucky enough to not have any damage. . . then the other side is that it doesn't do anything. It's just not worth it. TCA peels are less expensive and when administered by a doctor you can get great results. Not only are TCA peels currently cleaning up this mess for me, but my skin is improving beyond anything more that those 6 eMatrix procedures. Centers/offices make fortunes off these machines. That's why they use them. Also, once they invest in one - they have to use it whether it works or not. This is just my opinion. . . Everyone has to do what they think is best. Good luck!
I just met with two different Laser doctors in...
- 11 May 2012
Thanks for sharing. I had co2 laser performed over some of the square grids to try to fix this. The marks are still there. Lovely square grid in the middle of my brow. Co2 did tighten my under eye a bit but it it is still red 4 weeks later so it's not pretty for a while. Because the doctor numbed me it was painless - unlike ematrix. No idea what I can do about the scarring from ematrix. I continue tca peels for the pigment issues and am consulting with a dr. About fraxel and deep fx. But. It may be game over for me. Good luck. Let us know how it goes
On another note: If you are predisposed to hyperpigmentation. . . please do not be fooled into thinking these procedures will help. Causing injury (i.e. zapping the crap out of it) to the skin could increase the problem. Hypopigmentation is just as problematic. I learned the hard way. I got to see a digital image of the damage and it scary. I could even see completely devascularized areas where the treatment was far too harsh.
For any skeptics out there. . . .We aren't making this up. This many people can't be describing the same issues and all be imagining it. Most of us would much rather be using our time to shop, date, socialize, be with family, enjoy life, etc. than posting on these boards for kicks!
I just read your story apapel and it sounds so familiar.
I have no forehead or temple fat at all. You can see the bones and veins. I don't have good pictures to show what this looks like in a way that would make sense to the casual observer. I just keep hearing how thin I am - because they see this long face with no fat.
The orange peel skin is another ball game. I used to get compliments on my skin all the time. It's been unbelievable to watch it deteriorate long after these procedures were done. Age is one thing. .. This kind of textural change is beyond what I see on a normal aging person in my age group - who adhered to good skin care. And, I can actual see different marks. IPL was rectangle. eMatrix was square and then there are "zaps" that appear like small circles. . . like a perfectly formed acne pock mark. I knew my face very well. I knew every pore and mark on my face prior. Now I can't begin to count. . .
My quality of life has dropped so much. I have regrouped the best that I can to move foward. . . but I sometimes wonder if I'll ever feel the same and wish the old me would show up again. She wasn't perfect. . but I miss her.
Derms have explained that it is atrophy from thermal damage. Too much heat too deep caused dermal shrinking and fat loss. Unfortunately they treated too close to my eyes so I have eye damage as well. The bottom line is that many treaters do not report these adverse events to Syneron since that admits something went wrong. Syneron doesn't take reports from the patient. It is very sad. They need to know what is happening and take it seriously.
I would hesitate before doing another procedure. I saw many derms and some would suggest a different laser (the ones who haven't seen many damage cases) - but they all work the same way - they heat the skin and cause damage. The derms I saw from universities were adamint not to use more lasers as the skin had thinned too much already.
Good luck!
The studies done from these machines are usually from practitioners who are paid by the laser companies to do them - and they use very conservative settings. Essentially we are tossing dice as to how our outcome will be.
I actually agree with not doing laser again. I've been doing TCA peels which have helped. Babying your skin helps even more. That said, I've been working with this other surgeon for about a year and a half. He knows my history and he is so conservative and most importantly - will spot treat me. Most doctors will only do full face. I don't want full face even though I have damage throughout - I just want to get to some of the most distressing areas which have left me heartbroken.
I went to one of the developers of Fraxel and not only did he not recommend that product - he recommend the Erbium Yag (C03) full face for $4000 - knowing my history. Erbium Yag has a 20% approval on RealSelf. No thanks. Trust me. . . I don't recommend starting any of this to anyone - and wish I'd I'd been more grateful for what I had.
Keep us posted if you see any progress on your end and thanks for getting the word out!!!
Hi Ajapel,
So sorry you had an unhappy experience. Are you comfortable describing the specific damage? I'd be curious to hear what you are seeing. Did you just have one treatment or a series. What were your objectives is have the procedure.
Mine is textural and aging - In addition, I have square dents in the shape of the gridded handpiece. I literally have a dented grid in my glabella (the area between the brows). That doctor claimed they didn't exist. Frankly, I'm not convinced that RF, IPL, etc. don't cause fat loss because I lost forehead fat rapidly. I'm suggesting this because more and more large veins started showing with each month and my foreheads bones started becoming more prominent. It was slow - and then all of the sudden.everything dropped - all over the course of 6 months.
I agree that some of this is service provider's fault and the heat was too extreme and unmonitored. .but the fact that these adverse results are ignored, not addressed or even possible with the Syneron technology is frustrating.
The new doctor I'm working with is going to try some fractional CO2 to clean up the scarred areas. . . . I don't want to do anything because I"m so tired of it - but I trust this doctor and he's willing to do specific areas instead of full face. He'll do it when he does a different scar revision he's been workng on.
Thanks for sharing!
Anyway, I'm interviewing a couple dermatologists on Friday and will take it slowly. I will keep looking until I find an honest one who says, "Yes, you have geometric shapes on your face and yes, those are depressions and no, your skin will never be perfect, but I'm willing to do some work on you in small sections to see how you respond to make sure that you are happy with the outcome." That would be refreshing. I hope I'm not waiting too long to hear this!!! :).