Oxnard Plastic Surgeons
|
Lynn Jeffers, MD
Oxnard Plastic Surgeon
1700 N Rose Ave Suite 135, Oxnard |
4 answers |
Recent Answers
What are the benefits of having breast reconstruction at the same time as mastectomy, and in which situations would it be recommended to postpone reconstruction?
A: Breast reconstruction at the time of mastectomy can have advantagesWith the newer techniques available for breast reconstruction, more of my patients are eligible for immediate reconstruction.
My patient find that when they have immediate reconstruction, they wake up with a breast or at least a head start on breast reconstruction. Even my patients who choose tissue expanders can now wake up with a breast that is almost the same size as their previous breast with the newer techniques that are available. My patients tell me that this makes such a difference, psychologically.
In addition, in patients who have had previous radiation or will have radiation and are planning to have tissue expanders, immediate reconstruction offers probably the best chance that a tissue expander/implant reconstruction will be successful. Radiation affects your skin's ability to stretch and a delayed recosntruction would require that the skin be restretched which has been shown to have afailure rate of up to 50%.
If you are choosing a flap reconstruction and will have radiation, then I would recommend waiting for your reconstruction until after your radiation. You don't want to radiate you nice new reconstruction and cause scarring and distortion.
Radiesse Vs Juvederm for Lips?
Which do you think is better for lips, Radiesse vs Juvederm?
Radiesse should not be used in the lips. I routinely use Juvederm for the lips. It is much softer, pliable and less likely to cause lumps and nodules compared to Radiesse.
Breast Implants vs Tissue Fillers for Breast Reconstruction
I have breast cancer, and will undergo mastectomy, but my insurance will not approve the use of Alloderm for the reconstruction because they say its investigational. If this is the case, what are my other options?
A: Appeal the denial of Alloderm for Post-Mastectomy Breast ReconstructionIf you are denied from your insurance company for dermal matrix in your breast reconstruction, call them and ask why it is being considered experimental. What criteria are they using? Do they pay for another brand of dermal matrix (Alloderm is one brand of dermal matrix). Here in California, for instance, Anthem Blue Cross will only cover Alloderm and considers all other brands experimental (?!). Once you gather this information, file an appeal. There are many published articles regarding the dermal matrix and its use in post-mastectomy reconstruction.
Dermal matrix, while not absolutely necessary per se has a number of advantages:
For example:
1) Dermal matrix may lead to less pain. If dermal matrix is not used, your plastic surgeon may have to raise another muscle (the serratus muscle) to cover a part of your implant.
2) Dermal matrix may lead to fewer implant contractures. There is some emerging evidence that dermal matrix use around implants may decrease contractures (hardening) around implants.
3) Dermal matrix allows for more fill in the operating room. Most of the breast reconstruction that I do is done at the time of the mastectomy. In those instances, use of the dermal matrix allows me to fill the tissue expander more, so that you'll get more of a head start and need fewer fills in the office after the operation. Also, psychologically, it is less traumatic for my patients to wake up with a breast with significant volume in it. Some have even been happy enough not to get filled any further after the operation.
4) Dermal matrix allow for better shape and inframammary fold definition. The dermal matrix can be fixed to your chest wall to help recreate your fold that can be blunted after a mastectomy. Also the release of your muscle and placement of the dermal matrix allows for better expansion of the lower pole of your new breast which will make it look more natural.
5) Dermal matrix may allow for better results in radiation patients. In the past, patients who have had radiation or planning to have radiation were advised against having tissue expanders/implants. However, when the reconstruction is done at the same time as the mastectomy, it allows for more expansion in the operating room, less contracting of the skin, and so far for me, better results in patients I would have tradtitionally steered toward a TRAM or other big flap.
Hopefully you can cite some of these advantages in your appeal. Good luck!
