POSTED UNDER Natrelle Breast Implants REVIEWS
52 Years Old, 5' 7" 120 Lbs, 32A/B to 32C, Natrelle 410 FF Gummy Bear Teardrops, 335cc
ORIGINAL POST
After years of breast envy and child rearing (two...
WORTH IT$10,500
After years of breast envy and child rearing (two adult children now), I finally decided the time had come to treat myself to a decent pair of boobs! An acquaintance I met over the summer highly recommended Dr. Mark Epstein for the BA he had performed on her so I promptly made an appointment for a consultation. After the initial meeting, I knew I'd be very happy to have him perform the procedure and looked no further. I paid my deposit and scheduled the surgery for three weeks on.
I was clear from the start that I didn't want big, round [RS bleep] star-style boobs, telling Dr. Epstein I was partial to the teardrop shaped implants having reviewed photos of them and deciding a natural-looking slope (fuller lower pole) was more to my taste. I did not want anyone to see me post-op and know I'd had the procedure. I basically wanted to swap out my padded bras/bikinis for non-padded and look/feel sexier and more confident without my clothes. What little breast tissue I had pre-op was hard to see as my breasts are positioned very low on my chest so when viewed sideways without a bra my profile was quite flat.
Dr. Epstein is a big fan of the Natrelle Anatomical Shaped implants and decided I was the perfect candidate due to my diminished breast tissue and my goal for the most natural possible look. He said he used them routinely with great results (his patient reviews are stellar). He initially suggested I aim for a D cup but I adamantly replied that I would be most comfortable in the C range. Due to my very narrow chest wall, he chose the high profile implant (not sure what my BWD is - will find out). The week before the surgery I was in somewhat in a panic after reading so many other surgeons on Real Self stating a preference for round implants vs. anatomical for a variety of reasons (shifting out of the implant pocket, looking unnatural when lying down, less soft). Dr. Epstein and his staff assured me that none of those would be concerns, that all of his patients were very happy with their results and that his revision rate was far below the national average (less than 2%). In addition to the BA, I agreed to allow Dr. Epstein to correct an inverted nipple on my right side (an extra $2K!) figuring I was already spending over $10K and yet they wouldn't quite be perfect with two different-looking nipples. So I stuck with my original choice of teardrop implants and went ahead with the surgery on Aug 27th of this year.
The surgery went as well as expected and I was back to normal activities (except for my hot yoga) the next day! I would have returned to work two days post-surgery except that my grown son had had a terrible head injury from a skateboarding accident and I was in and out of the hospital for several days (talk about stress!!). Had I returned as planned, I'd have had to conceal the plastic medicine cup-cover that was sewn to my healing right nipple the first five days! I was wearing a draping scarf in 85+ degree weather!
My pain was relatively minimal during the initial healing process...I only required 800 mg of Ibuprofin on and off for about a week and then only as needed. The muscle contractions (forgot to mention the implants were placed sub-muscular) were quite painful at times, especially upon waking and standing up for the first time. I was also uncomfortable in my bras (non-underwire and sports bras) due to the chafing near the incision as well as touching the nipples which were hyper-sensitive after a few days. I flew to England on a planned trip exactly three weeks post-surgery with no issues. Upon returning, I resumed my hot yoga classes. After about five weeks, the swelling had completely subsided and any discomfort I'd previously had was gone.
I do wish I had gone slightly larger now although going up to the 385 cc from 335 cc would have made very little noticeable difference from everything I've read (50 ccs is about the equivalent of two shot glasses of volume, if I recall). It's possible that going above 400 ccs wouldn't have worked given my chest wall dimensions, skin elasticity, etc. It's true, however, that you quickly become accustomed to your new breasts, forgetting how small you started out. I still find myself looking at all the other BA photos on this site and wondering if I chose the right shape & size implants. I have to stop!!
Overall, after 2 1/2 months, I can say I am very happy with my beautiful, natural-looking new breasts (as is my "boyfriend"). I wish I'd done it about ten years sooner but I take good care of myself and intend to get the most mileage out of them possible (the advantage to being over 50 is that I'll probably never need them replaced!).
My four month post-op visit is next month and I'll post more before/after photos taken at the PS's office then.
I was clear from the start that I didn't want big, round [RS bleep] star-style boobs, telling Dr. Epstein I was partial to the teardrop shaped implants having reviewed photos of them and deciding a natural-looking slope (fuller lower pole) was more to my taste. I did not want anyone to see me post-op and know I'd had the procedure. I basically wanted to swap out my padded bras/bikinis for non-padded and look/feel sexier and more confident without my clothes. What little breast tissue I had pre-op was hard to see as my breasts are positioned very low on my chest so when viewed sideways without a bra my profile was quite flat.
Dr. Epstein is a big fan of the Natrelle Anatomical Shaped implants and decided I was the perfect candidate due to my diminished breast tissue and my goal for the most natural possible look. He said he used them routinely with great results (his patient reviews are stellar). He initially suggested I aim for a D cup but I adamantly replied that I would be most comfortable in the C range. Due to my very narrow chest wall, he chose the high profile implant (not sure what my BWD is - will find out). The week before the surgery I was in somewhat in a panic after reading so many other surgeons on Real Self stating a preference for round implants vs. anatomical for a variety of reasons (shifting out of the implant pocket, looking unnatural when lying down, less soft). Dr. Epstein and his staff assured me that none of those would be concerns, that all of his patients were very happy with their results and that his revision rate was far below the national average (less than 2%). In addition to the BA, I agreed to allow Dr. Epstein to correct an inverted nipple on my right side (an extra $2K!) figuring I was already spending over $10K and yet they wouldn't quite be perfect with two different-looking nipples. So I stuck with my original choice of teardrop implants and went ahead with the surgery on Aug 27th of this year.
The surgery went as well as expected and I was back to normal activities (except for my hot yoga) the next day! I would have returned to work two days post-surgery except that my grown son had had a terrible head injury from a skateboarding accident and I was in and out of the hospital for several days (talk about stress!!). Had I returned as planned, I'd have had to conceal the plastic medicine cup-cover that was sewn to my healing right nipple the first five days! I was wearing a draping scarf in 85+ degree weather!
My pain was relatively minimal during the initial healing process...I only required 800 mg of Ibuprofin on and off for about a week and then only as needed. The muscle contractions (forgot to mention the implants were placed sub-muscular) were quite painful at times, especially upon waking and standing up for the first time. I was also uncomfortable in my bras (non-underwire and sports bras) due to the chafing near the incision as well as touching the nipples which were hyper-sensitive after a few days. I flew to England on a planned trip exactly three weeks post-surgery with no issues. Upon returning, I resumed my hot yoga classes. After about five weeks, the swelling had completely subsided and any discomfort I'd previously had was gone.
I do wish I had gone slightly larger now although going up to the 385 cc from 335 cc would have made very little noticeable difference from everything I've read (50 ccs is about the equivalent of two shot glasses of volume, if I recall). It's possible that going above 400 ccs wouldn't have worked given my chest wall dimensions, skin elasticity, etc. It's true, however, that you quickly become accustomed to your new breasts, forgetting how small you started out. I still find myself looking at all the other BA photos on this site and wondering if I chose the right shape & size implants. I have to stop!!
Overall, after 2 1/2 months, I can say I am very happy with my beautiful, natural-looking new breasts (as is my "boyfriend"). I wish I'd done it about ten years sooner but I take good care of myself and intend to get the most mileage out of them possible (the advantage to being over 50 is that I'll probably never need them replaced!).
My four month post-op visit is next month and I'll post more before/after photos taken at the PS's office then.
UPDATED FROM KatieLouise64
3 months post
Natural looking?
This is the silhouette I was hoping for. Although I still wish I had a little more lower pole volume, I'm very happy with the natural appearance. They are lower on the chest than average but that's just the way I'm built.
Replies (43)
November 21, 2016
Look great!!!


November 21, 2016
Absolutely beautiful!!! Were they on top put on top of the muscle?


November 22, 2016
Gorgeous figure! Your surgeon is a true artist. Good for you :) congrats!!

December 8, 2016
Looking really great! How do they feel? are they hard when you hold them?

December 18, 2016
Thank you! They are quite soft & squishy, actually. Granted, my natural breast tissue sits on top so that makes a difference but even the implant is very malleable.
UPDATED FROM KatieLouise64
1 year post
One year since N.A. surgery
Hi everyone. Today is one year since my BA so I thought I'd document here for anyone who's interested. Although I am overall pleased with final results, I occasionally wish I'd done more research before taking the plunge. I may have opted for round vs teardrop and/or slightly larger. Most of the time, however, I think I made the best choice (with surgeon's input), that my new boobs are proportionate to my frame & are as natural looking as I could've hoped to achieve.
Replies (12)

August 30, 2017
Hi and happy anniversary to your new boobs! I really think they look gorgeous and veru natural. I personnaly think they are very big and bigger would look tacky to me... The pornstar look you did not want!
May I ask why you wiuld have chose the round implants instead? I am really torn between both implants as well!
It must hard after with all those sort of implantson market and sizes, you always wonder if another kind or size would have been better.

September 13, 2017
Thanks so much, Vanessa! I do think it's impossible to be objective about our own boobs & body parts so I really appreciate an outsider's feedback. I happened to see my surgeon last week & he reiterated that he didn't want to go any bigger on my frame, also stating that with time a larger implant would stretch the skin tissue & begun to sag so I am convinced now that 335cc size was the right choice. I originally shunned round implants thinking I'd end up with those telltale grapefruit looking boobs...too much upper pole fullness which isn't so natural looking. However, I didn't consider that the submuscular placement negates that result & end up looking more like a teardrop shape over time from what I've read- the bad boob jobs I've seen were probably over the muscle where there wasn't enough natural tissue to conceal the roundness. I also think a round implant MAY have given me better cleavage, or at least a smaller gap, but the surgeon insists that the gap is entirely a result of where the muscles attach to the sternum...mine happen to be attached further apart. The round implant is a couple grand cheaper than the teardrop for what I believe would have been a similar result so if money's a consideration, that's something else to consider. On the plus side, because it's form stable, I feel more confident that I have less to worry about with rupturing, oozing & related complications. Also, the full height, full projection (FF) of a teardrop implant was prob best for me given the longer than average distance between my clavicle & nipples...I NEEDED height & projection. So overall, I'm happy with my choice...my visit to the surgeon was affirming. Best of luck to you - would love to hear what you decide to do!
September 25, 2017
Hey, seen your comments on a few reviews, how you doing- are you still deciding between teardrop or round? I do hope you get your wish boobs soon if that's what you chose to do :)

September 26, 2017
Hi! No, I had my BA over a year ago & went with the teardrop. I've had my doubts about whether I made the right decision (round vs. teardrop) but I'm quite pleased with the results - I'll never take my boobs for granted! Did you have surgery? I'll have a look... : )

September 12, 2017
Hi. I have to say your end result looks so natural. Its very hard not to feel boob greed when looking on here :)
Im a similar age and had the same teardrop implants (except with a mastopexy as well). Mine feel quite firm, especially when I lie down and quite a different feeling to my breast tissue. Do you find this with yours and does your boyfriend comment?
Thanks in advance :) Id give your doctor 10/10
Im a similar age and had the same teardrop implants (except with a mastopexy as well). Mine feel quite firm, especially when I lie down and quite a different feeling to my breast tissue. Do you find this with yours and does your boyfriend comment?
Thanks in advance :) Id give your doctor 10/10

September 14, 2017
Thank you! Your results are great, too! I agree - boob envy! Human nature, I suppose, always thinking someone else has something you don't. Mine feel the least natural when laying down, like you said - very firm at the base - probably because there's less natural tissue there (it's mostly at the nipple area & above) & also because they're form stable/textured. It's a trade-off, I think. They'll never lose their shape & we should never have to worry about rupturing. At our age, too, less likelihood they'll ever need replacing! My BF likes them very much (he says!)...he'd had a couple prior GF's with implants which he described as crystal balls in a sock!

September 16, 2017
Ha ha. That's good to know as I did wonder how they compare to others - shame we cant feel beforehand and say "ill have two of those please" :). Thank you for the reply and reassurance about your feelings of how yours have settled. I really do feel more feminine and cant wait for Summer over here where I will actually fill my bikini top this year!!!
September 14, 2017
You look amazing! Sometimes the rounds can be too much on someone you size. They spill over the sides and will make you look kind of heavy. You chose the perfect style and you simply could not look any better!

September 15, 2017
Thank you for the positive feedback! I think you're probably right but regardless I have to accept what I (& surgeon) chose. I'm amazed at how many women get revisions done to swap out - wouldn't be worth it to me. As I said to someone else, it's our nature to second guess our choices...unless the end result is completely at odds with one's expectations, best to accept the final result.
December 24, 2017
Hello! You look lovely! I am currently researching the Natrelle 410 teardrop, as I don't want the "stripper boobs." Why do you feel that you would have opted for the round vs. teardrop post year? Are they comfortable? I heard from several reviews that they are very hard. . .thank you for your help!
Replies (23)
I am 5'6" 115 I'm hoping I picked the right size for my body. I workout daily so I'm not looking forward to the down time or meds , but I've always wanted this just always nervous about it.