Treatment Provider
- Our highly-trained Review Moderation team evaluates all reviews before they're published to ensure they're written by people like you and not a member of a doctor's office.
- This multi-step process takes up to 24 hours from review submission to publication.
- Doctors can't pay to have reviews removed or hidden.
- Reviews are only removed at the reviewer's request or if they violate our Terms of Service.
If you have questions or believe we should re-evaluate a published review, let us know.
Breast Reduction Gone Wrong
My breast reduction with him went horribly wrong. He did a terrible job and left me mutilated and mentally scared. While he did explain the risks, mainly nipple loss which was downplayed “as it never happened with him before.” I did not expect my nipples to be so far to the side, the wound to open and leak fat for a month, the scars go all the way to my back , the strange shape of my breast . He then tried to down play the situation saying he’ll tidy it up and will reconstruction a nipple under local anaesthetic . I’ll say so more photos attached...

13 Jul 2020
Thank you for your review. It is imperative to highlight to the readers that your case was not a standard primary breast reduction. Redo breast operations like your case, are more hazardous procedures with a different risk profile to primary reductions (I have carried out over 300 primary breast reductions and never experienced any major complications). Your original surgeon had left your breasts far too large and the decision to proceed was based on improving your long term function.
Provider Review

13 Jul 2020
Thank you for your review. It is imperative to highlight to the readers that your case was not a standard primary breast reduction. Redo breast operations like your case, are more hazardous procedures with a different risk profile to primary reductions (I have carried out over 300 primary breast reductions and never experienced any major complications). Your original surgeon had left your breasts far too large and the decision to proceed was based on improving your long term function.