Get the real deal on beauty treatments—real doctors, real reviews, and real photos with real results.Here's how we earn your trust.

Two Revisions Later Horrible Deformity and Complications

UPDATED FROM Practical524561
9 months post

Text correspondence

Text correspondence between office reassuring my upsize will not have complications, before surgery I messaged the office to make sure the large size implant was going to be a size choice and they reassured me, this was misinformation and the results have caused permanent damage to my body that new require more complicated and costly surgery.

Practical524561's provider

Marshall T. Partington, MD, FACS

Marshall T. Partington, MD, FACS

Board Certified Plastic Surgeon

4.8 | 114 Reviews
PROFILE
Overall rating

Replies (0)

ORIGINAL POST

Two Revisions Later Horrible Deformity and Complications

I underwent revision breast augmentation surgery with Dr. Partington in September 2025 to exchange my under-the-muscle implants for over-the-muscle implants in hopes of achieving a more natural appearance.

At the time, I was 5’2”, approximately 105 pounds, and had previously undergone a successful augmentation in 2023 with 415cc high-profile implants. For the September 2025 revision, we selected 560cc moderate-profile implants after discussing my goals and concerns regarding implant size and potential complications. Based on the recommendations I received, I felt confident moving forward.

Unfortunately, the outcome was not what I had hoped for. Following the surgery, I developed significant rippling, contour deformities, pain, and cosmetic issues that had not existed before. In my personal opinion, the implants chosen were too large for my frame and tissue characteristics.

When I raised my concerns, Dr. Partington agreed to perform a revision surgery at no additional surgeon fee in January 2026. During that procedure, my implants were exchanged for 380cc moderate-profile implants in an effort to improve the complications.

Unfortunately, the second surgery did not resolve the issues. I continued to experience pain, deformity, and cosmetic concerns, and in some respects the appearance became even more difficult for me to live with. The changes have affected my confidence and quality of life, and the deformities have been noticeable enough that friends have commented on them without prompting.

Over the past several months, I have sought opinions from multiple board-certified plastic surgeons in both Canada and Los Angeles. While treatment recommendations vary, several surgeons have advised that correcting my current condition may require additional complex revision surgery and substantial expense. Some have discussed the possibility of a staged approach involving implant removal, a period of healing, and re-augmentation at a later date, while others have discussed the potential use of supportive materials such as Strattice. Even with these options, there is no guarantee that I will ever achieve the natural result I originally sought.

The outcome of these surgeries has left me in a significantly worse position than where I started—physically, emotionally, and financially. I am now facing ongoing discomfort, uncertainty, and the possibility of further corrective procedures.

I recognize that revision breast surgery is inherently complex and that complications can occur with any surgeon. However, both revision procedures were performed by the same surgeon, and I trusted the guidance I received regarding implant selection and surgical planning. Looking back, I wish I never did surgery with this surgeon.

I chose an experienced Seattle surgeon because I wanted the highest level of care and expertise. Unfortunately, my experience did not produce the outcome I was promised or hoping for.

I encourage anyone considering revision breast surgery to obtain multiple consultations, carefully evaluate all available options, and ensure they fully understand the potential risks and long-term consequences before proceeding.

Replies (0)