Get the real deal on beauty treatments—real doctors, real reviews, and real photos with real results.Here's how we earn your trust.

POSTED UNDER Dysport REVIEWS

Prefer Dysport over Botox - Quicker and Less Expensive

Name: Prefer Dysport over Botox - Quicker and Less Expensive
Item: Daniel Reichner, MD, FACS
Rating: 5
Author: Amy in Socal

ORIGINAL POST

I decided to try Dysport because I wanted a more...

Amy in SocalJuly 11, 2009

WORTH IT$450

I decided to try Dysport because I wanted a more affordable treatment than Botox. I found a place in Newport Beach, CA and was happy with the results.

The pros are: it is cheaper than Botox per about $4.00 per unit. It doesn't hurt anymore than Botox and the treatment was done in about 5 or 10 min. which was nice!

Amy in Socal's provider

Daniel Reichner, MD, FACS

Board Certified Plastic Surgeon

4.9 | 120 Reviews

PROFILE

Amy in Socal rating for Dr. Reichner:

Overall rating

Replies (4)

PalsticGurlFla

August 9, 2009

Make sure you understand the pricing structure. Although Dysport is less expensive per unit, it takes 50 units to treat the Glabella area. Botox takes 20 units. Bottom line Dysport may not be significantly cheaper.

user0991

November 17, 2009

This comment was removed at the request of the user.

sue-h

December 16, 2009

I just had Dysport yesterday...it's currently 3 am and I'm unable to sleep due to the severe heart palpitations I'm having. I say DON'T do it! I also tried Botox and felt bad, but convinced myself it was all in my head. I thought I'd try Dysport, but am very sad I did.