Why is it people mention BII but silicone is used for other things like chin implants, hip implants etc.?

Dear amylouise23,
the rate of BII is very low. There have been numerous studies on the safety and efficacy of silicone breast implants. The FDA has approved them to be safe and breast augmentation is the most common cosmetic surgical procedure performed in the United States every year. Implants are much different than they used to be with rigorous testing and cohesive gel. I can't tell you how happy my breast augmentation patients have been with their implants.
I would recommend a consult with a plastic surgeon to go over all of your concerns. Saline implants are also a perfectly good option if you are still concerned and are less expensive.
Daniel Barrett, MDCertified, American Board of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Plastic SurgeryMember, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

You have brought up a great point! There is much we still do not know or understand about BII. When those who complain of BII symptoms have their implants removed, many report symptoms improve. Others do not. It is important when considering breast augmentation that you are well informed and make the decision that's best for you. Breast implants are FDA approved and deemed safe for use in the human body. Millions of patients have undergone breast augmentation with no issues and are happy with their results.

Good point! In fact, in a current ongoing prospective trial involving women with breast implants who feel they have systemic symptoms, the majority had SALINE implants. This simple fact does not deter the SSBI activists who want breast implants out of all women though; they simply say it's the silicone elastomer shell that is common in both types of implants that has all the 'bad stuff' in it. Unfortunately, this trial looked at a lot of bad stuff: 20 different heavy metals, the genetic signature of any possible bacteria on the surface of the implants or in the capsule, endotoxins produced by bacteria and fungus, and even patient cytokines from their immune system and could not find anything that was unique to the women with symptoms versus the women without symptoms with implants, or even in women who never had implants. Further, how the capsule was removed and whether capsule was left behind had no impact on the 'recovery' of women with symptoms after explant; further debunking this incessant requirement from the SSBI activist to make women go to 'specialists' to perform a surgery called 'en bloc capsulectomy' (which is actually a common procedure that all plastic surgeons know how to perform). This whole thing is just one big gaslighting of vulnerable women with subjective symptoms who don't have answers. Further studies will be necessary to confirm, but it is most likely that SSBI is a non-entity.